ADA Urges Congress to Increase Oversight of Dental Insurance Markets

In a letter to a House Judiciary subcommittee, the association pushed for tighter scrutiny of insurer market power, AI-driven claim denials, and network leasing — while warning against rules built for hospital systems.

The American Dental Association (ADA) wants Congress to take a harder look at how dental insurers do business — but without saddling small practices with compliance rules written for hospital chains, ADA News reports.

According to ADA News, the association laid out its priorities in a comment letter to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust, submitted ahead of the panel’s Sept. 14 field hearing, “Examining Healthcare Markets: Fraud and Competition.”

Market Concentration and Network Leasing

Insurer concentration topped the ADA’s list of concerns. Citing a U.S. Government Accountability Office analysis, the association told lawmakers that the three largest stand-alone dental insurers together hold 38% to 97% of the group market depending on the state, and command at least 80% in 11 states. The ADA asked federal regulators to keep close watch on mergers, vertical integration, network design, patient steering, and contracting behavior.

The letter also flagged network leasing. Per ADA News, the association told the subcommittee that shared-network deals aren’t inherently problematic, but quietly extending a dentist’s negotiated rates to outside entities leaves both practices and patients guessing about which fee schedule applies. The ADA wants dentists to affirmatively opt in to any new network arrangement and to receive advance notice of material contract or fee changes.

AI in Claims and Fraud Prevention

On fraud, waste, and abuse, the ADA argued that enforcement should be narrowly targeted — and singled out insurers’ expanding use of artificial intelligence and automated claim reviews as a place where guardrails are needed.

“Payment suspensions, artificial-intelligence tools and automated claims reviews should include appropriate validation, transparency, appeal rights and human review,” says the ADA in a release. “Insurers should not use AI as the sole basis for claim denials or prior authorization decisions.”

Medicare Advantage and ERISA

The comments also took on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). ADA News reports that carriers and third-party administrators have at times invoked ERISA preemption to sidestep state dental protections that apply to fully insured plans. The ADA wants Congress to clarify that state rules governing how dental care is delivered and paid for still hold when a carrier is administering a self-funded plan.

Medicare Advantage drew similar scrutiny. Noting that 52% of MA enrollees pick their plan based on the supplemental dental benefit, the ADA asked for standardized electronic eligibility and benefit verification, arguing that manual checks across a patchwork of plan designs eat up staff time at the front desk. The association also pressed for stronger dental-specific reporting on benefit design, utilization, network adequacy, claims payment, and spending.

Finally, the ADA urged lawmakers not to let policies aimed at hospital consolidation spill over onto small dental offices. While the association agreed that provider market power is a real issue in parts of health care, it told the subcommittee that dentistry looks nothing like a consolidated hospital system — most practices are small businesses negotiating against far larger national insurers.

“Independent dental practices are generally small businesses and should not be conflated with large, consolidated health systems when Congress considers remedies aimed at provider market power,” says the ADA in a release.

Photo: ID 77022651 © Kmiragaya | Dreamstime.com