The Alpha Foundation; Improving mine safety through research
In
* Establish a trust within 120 days.
* Pay a total of
* Administer the trust by three highly qualified individuals with academic and/or professional backgrounds in mine health and safety.
In
The board established guiding principles of the foundation, which are as follows:
* Mission: to improve mine health and safety through funding R&D projects to qualified academic institutions and other not-for-profit organizations.
* Vision: to enable miners in the future to be free of work related injury or disease by the implementation of the results of the projects funded by the foundation and undertaken by the best researchers from any discipline that can contribute.
The foundation is now approaching its third year and regularly posts updates, including semi-annual reports, to its website (www.http.alpha-foundation.org/), which serves as the main medium for communication with the broader stakeholder community.
Completing the foundation structure and organization
Following a solicitation and evaluation process of nine firms, the foundation selected the
During its first year, the foundation retained
The foundation chose to seek assistance from independent scientific experts as peer reviewers to provide systematic assessment of all funding proposal submissions. The directors, in making final funding decisions, rely on the recommendations of these experts.
Finally, during the last six months, the foundation can report that, after leading the development of instruments necessary for the establishment and functioning of the foundation as a mature entity,
Developing research priorities
An early major initiative of the foundation was to convene a meeting to discuss priorities and issues in mine safety and health research with the broad mining community and to solicit recommendations for attracting participation and projects from outstanding researchers and organizations. The meeting, held in
Using the feedback from this meeting, the directors developed the research priorities for the first solicitation. The research priority areas were selected to expand the knowledge base of mining safety and health information, address gaps and critical areas and encourage projects that can lead to resolving the complex mining safety and health problems.
Grant solicitations
First solicitation cycle. The directors decided on a two-stage application process for major proposals. Thus, the first call for proposals, released on
* Safety: proposals that examine explosions, coal and rock bursts, spontaneous combustion, through the-earth communication, emergency response systems, improved measurement of dust exposure and control.
* Health: focus on whole body vibration, diseases of the lung and heart and improved use of existing systems to identify and alleviate adverse health in miners.
* Safety and health management: attention to management of risks includes exploration of innovative risk management programs and assessment of effective hazard identification and control.
* Training: preparing miners for maximum safety involves research, which considers both evaluation of effectiveness and exploration of new training methods.
The foundation was pleased that 159 concept papers were submitted that addressed all focus areas. The project selection cycle began with the review of those concept papers by independent review teams, involving about 80 external reviewers, who made recommendations to the directors.
After this review, organizations that submitted the 33 most promising concept papers were invited to submit full proposals. These full proposals were rigorously reviewed - again using external reviewers - and the directors approved 16 projects for funding, totaling about
These funding decisions were made public on
First short-term solicitation cycle. A solicitation was issued
Approximately
Second solicitation cycle. A second call for major research proposals, announced
* Health and safety interventions: Projects that examine coal and rock burst potential, spontaneous combustion, as well as systems of integrated surface mining safety. Interventions under study include improved measurement of dust exposure and dust control, while innovative solutions are being sought in the rock dust measurement and advanced gas and dust explosion modeling. Advances are also being explored in areas of measurement of roof bolt loading and ground response, as well as early warning forecasting of hazardous conditions through atmospheric monitoring.
* Injury and disease exposure and risk factors: For miner health, the foci are on whole body vibration and diseases of the lung and heart. There is also a focus on enhancing the use of surveillance data and health records to identify early risk factors of adverse health in miners to facilitate targeting for advanced preventive or administrative measures.
* Safety and health management and training: Attention to management of risks includes exploration of innovative risk management programs and assessment of effective hazard identification and control measures and practices.
* Mine escape, rescue and training: Funding is targeting ways to maximize a miner's preparedness to assess emergency situations and respond effectively through improved training methods. Other activities are seeking to make improvements in the design, application and training of recent technological advancements in communication and tracking, as well as sheltering when escape is unattainable.
The foundation was encouraged by the 69 concept papers received. An advisory panel of independent technical content experts within specific topical areas completed the review of these papers and provided recommendations to the Alpha directors. Following this review, full proposal invitations were sent to 26 investigators. Twenty four full proposals were submitted and are currently being peer reviewed.
Accomplishments
An overall summary of the grant awards thus far is shown in Fig. 1. The largest set of awards has been in the health and safety intervention focus area (43 percent), followed by injury and disease exposure and risk factors (24 percent), safety and health management and training (19 percent) and mine escape, rescue and training (14 percent). The funding level is more uniform with the majority of funding (31 percent) in the health and safety intervention focus area.
There is similar funding in the safety and health management and training areas, and injury and disease exposure and risk factors areas, with funding levels at 27 percent and 25 percent, respectively. The lowest amount of funding has been allotted to the mine escape, rescue and training area (17 percent). Overall, the foundation is pleased that the funding effort is properly aligned with the industry fatality and injury trends and the research priority needs selected by the foundation with guidance from the stakeholders and industry constituents.
Each focus area is divided into topical areas, which represent areas of research priority. The majority of the topical areas have been included for funding. Most of the awards, meanwhile, have been in the topical areas of fire and explosion prevention area, as well as safety and health management, both of which were driving forces behind events leading to the creation of the foundation.
Looking forward
With the solid foundation of a diverse portfolio of projects from the first two grant cycles, as well as the promise of expanding this portfolio through the current cycle, the
Recognizing the value of the initial
This input will be vital in developing a long-range plan to guide the next phase of the foundation's work. *
Acknowledgments
The author would like to acknowledge the
The Elk River MCHM spill; A case study on managing environmental risks
A.M. Best Revises Outlook to Positive for Wisconsin Municipal Mutual Insurance Company
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News