PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC – 10-Q – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
| Edgar Online, Inc. |
The following analysis discusses our financial condition as ofSeptember 30, 2012 , compared withDecember 31, 2011 , and our consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The discussion and analysis includes, where appropriate, factors that may affect our future financial performance. The discussion should be read in conjunction with our Form 10-K, for the year endedDecember 31, 2011 , filed with theSEC and the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related notes to the financial statements and the other financial information included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
Forward-Looking Information
Our narrative analysis below contains forward-looking statements intended to enhance the reader's ability to assess our future financial performance. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements that represent our beliefs concerning future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments, and contain words and phrases such as "anticipate," "believe," "plan," "estimate," "expect," "intend" and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are made based upon management's current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on us. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements as a result of risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the following: (1) adverse capital and credit market conditions may significantly affect our ability to meet liquidity needs, as well as our access to capital and cost of capital; (2) continued difficult conditions in the global capital markets and the economy generally may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations; (3) continued volatility or further declines in the equity markets could reduce our assets under management ("AUM") and may result in investors withdrawing from the markets or decreasing their rates of investment, all of which could reduce our revenues and net income; (4) changes in interest rates or credit spreads may adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and our net income can vary from period-to-period; (5) our investment portfolio is subject to several risks that may diminish the value of our invested assets and the investment returns credited to customers, which could reduce our sales, revenues, AUM and net income; (6) our valuation of fixed maturities, equity securities and derivatives may include methodologies, estimations and assumptions which are subject to differing interpretations and could result in changes to investment valuations that may materially adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition; (7) the determination of the amount of allowances and impairments taken on our investments requires estimations and assumptions which are subject to differing interpretations and could materially impact our results of operations or financial position; (8) gross unrealized losses may be realized or result in future impairments, resulting in a reduction in our net income; (9) competition from companies that may have greater financial resources, broader arrays of products, higher ratings and stronger financial performance may impair our ability to retain existing customers, attract new customers and maintain our profitability; (10) a downgrade in our financial strength or credit ratings may increase policy surrenders and withdrawals, reduce new sales and terminate relationships with distributors, impact existing liabilities and increase our cost of capital, any of which could adversely affect our profitability and financial condition; (11) our efforts to reduce the impact of interest rate changes on our profitability and retained earnings may not be effective; (12) if we are unable to attract and retain sales representatives and develop new distribution sources, sales of our products and services may be reduced; (13) our international businesses face political, legal, operational and other risks that could reduce our profitability in those businesses; (14) we may face losses if our actual experience differs significantly from our pricing and reserving assumptions; (15) our ability to pay stockholder dividends and meet our obligations may be constrained by the limitations on dividends or distributions Iowa insurance laws impose on Principal Life; (16) the pattern of amortizing our DPAC and other actuarial balances on our universal life-type insurance contracts, participating life insurance policies and certain investment contracts may change, impacting both the level of the DPAC and other actuarial balances and the timing of our net income; (17) we may need to fund deficiencies in our "Closed Block" assets that support participating ordinary life insurance policies that had a dividend scale in force at the time of Principal Life's 1998 conversion into a stock life insurance company; (18) a pandemic, terrorist attack or other catastrophic event could adversely affect our net income; (19) our reinsurers could default on their obligations or increase their rates, which could adversely impact our net income and profitability; (20) we face risks arising from our ability to obtain regulatory approval and consummate the acquisition of Cuprum and from other acquisitions of businesses; (21) changes in laws, regulations or accounting standards may reduce our profitability; (22) we may be unable to mitigate the impact of Regulation XXX and Actuarial Guideline 38, potentially resulting in a negative impact to our capital position and/or a reduction in sales of term and universal life insurance products; (23) a computer system failure or security breach could disrupt our business, damage our reputation and adversely impact our profitability; (24) results of litigation and regulatory investigations may affect our financial strength or reduce our profitability; (25) from time to time we may become subject to tax audits, tax litigation or similar proceedings, and as a result we may owe additional taxes, interest and penalties in amounts that may be material; (26) fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could reduce our profitability; (27) applicable laws and our certificate of incorporation and by-laws may discourage takeovers and business combinations that some stockholders might consider in their best interests and (28) our financial results may be adversely impacted by global climate changes. 90 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents Overview
We provide financial products and services through the following reportable segments:
† Retirement and Investor Services, which consists of our asset accumulation operations that provide retirement savings and related investment products and services. We provide a comprehensive portfolio of asset accumulation products and services to businesses and individuals in the U.S., with a concentration on small and medium-sized businesses. We offer to businesses products and services for defined contribution pension plans, including 401(k) and 403(b) plans, defined benefit pension plans, nonqualified executive benefit plans and employee stock ownership plan consulting services. We also offer annuities, mutual funds and bank products and services to the employees of our business customers and other individuals. †Principal Global Investors , which consists of our asset management operations, manages assets for sophisticated investors around the world, using a multi-boutique strategy that enables the segment to provide an expanded range of diverse investment capabilities including equity, fixed income and real estate investments.Principal Global Investors also has experience in currency management, asset allocation, stable value management and other structured investment strategies.
†
†U.S. Insurance Solutions , which provides individual life insurance as well as specialty benefits in the U.S. Our individual life insurance products include universal and variable universal life insurance and traditional life insurance. Our specialty benefit products include group dental and vision insurance, individual and group disability insurance, group life insurance, wellness services and non-medical fee-for-service claims administration. † Corporate, which manages the assets representing capital that has not been allocated to any other segment. Financial results of the Corporate segment primarily reflect our financing activities (including interest expense and preferred stock dividends), income on capital not allocated to other segments, inter-segment eliminations, income tax risks and certain income, expenses and other after-tax adjustments not allocated to the segments based on the nature of such items.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Other Actuarial Balances
Incremental direct costs of contract acquisition as well as certain costs directly related to acquisition activities (underwriting, policy issuance and processing, medical and inspection and sales force contract selling) for the successful acquisition of new and renewal insurance policies and investment contract business are capitalized to the extent recoverable. Maintenance costs and acquisition costs that are not deferrable are charged to net income as incurred. Amortization Based on Estimated Gross Profits.DPAC for universal life-type insurance contracts, participating life insurance policies and certain investment contracts are amortized over the expected lifetime of the policies in relation to EGPs. In addition toDPAC , the following actuarial balances are also amortized in relation to EGPs. † Sales inducement asset - Sales inducements are amounts that are credited to the contractholder's account balance as an inducement to purchase the contract. LikeDPAC , the cost of the sales inducement is capitalized and amortized over the expected life of the contract, in proportion to EGPs.
† Unearned revenue liability - An unearned revenue liability is established when we collect fees or other policyholder assessments that represent compensation for services to be provided in future periods. These revenues are deferred and then amortized over the expected life of the contract, in proportion to EGPs.
† Reinsurance asset or liability - For universal-life type products that are reinsured, a reinsurance asset or liability is established to spread the expected net reinsurance costs or profits in proportion to the EGPs on the underlying business. † Present value of future profits (''PVFP'') - This is an intangible asset that arises in connection with the acquisition of a life insurance company or a block of insurance business. PVFP for universal life-type insurance contracts, participating life insurance policies and certain investment contracts is amortized over the expected life of the contracts acquired, in proportion to EGPs. We also have additional benefit reserves that are established for annuity or universal life-type contracts that provide benefit guarantees, or for contracts that are expected to produce profits followed by losses. The liabilities are accrued in relation to estimated contract assessments. We define EGPs to include assumptions relating to mortality, morbidity, lapses, investment yield and expenses as well as the change in our liability for certain guarantees and the difference between actual and expected reinsurance premiums and recoveries, 91
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
depending on the nature of the contract. We develop an estimate of EGPs at issue and each valuation date. As actual experience emerges, the gross profits may vary from those expected either in magnitude or timing, in which case a true-up to actual occurs as a charge or credit to current net income. In addition, we are required to revise our assumptions regarding future experience if actual experience or other evidence suggests that earlier estimates should be revised; we refer to this as unlocking. Both actions, reflecting actual experience and changing future estimates, can change both the current amount and the future amortization pattern of theDPAC asset and related actuarial balances. For individual variable life insurance, individual variable annuities and group annuities that have separate account U.S. equity investment options, we utilize a mean reversion methodology (reversion to the mean assumption), a common industry practice, to determine the future domestic equity market growth rate assumption used for the calculation of EGPs. If actual annualized U.S. equity market performance varies from our 8% long-term assumption, we assume different performance levels in the short-term such that the mean return is equal to the long-term assumption over the mean reversion period. However, our mean reversion process generally limits assumed returns to a range of 4-12% during the mean reversion period. The 12% cap was reached during the third quarter of 2008, and the mean reversion rate has remained at the 12% cap since then. Therefore, until the mean reversion rate falls below the 12% cap, we will not adjust the equity return assumption by the amount needed to result in a mean return equal to the long-term assumption. In limited circumstances,DPAC and certain of the actuarial balances noted above are amortized in proportion to estimated gross revenues rather than EGPs. Estimated gross revenues include similar assumptions as the revenue component of EGPs and the changes of future estimates and reflection of actual experience is done in the same manner as EGPs discussed above. Amortization Based on Premium-Paying Period.DPAC of non-participating term life insurance and individual disability policies are amortized over the premium-paying period of the related policies using assumptions consistent with those used in computing policyholder liabilities. Once these assumptions are made for a given policy or group of policies, they will not be changed over the life of the policy unless a loss recognition event occurs. As ofMarch 31, 2012 , these policies accounted for 13% of our totalDPAC balance. Internal Replacements. We review policies for modifications that result in the exchange of an existing contract for a new contract. If the new contract is determined to be an internal replacement that is substantially changed from the replaced contract, any unamortizedDPAC and related actuarial balances are written off and acquisition costs related to the new contract are capitalized as appropriate. If the new contract is substantially unchanged, we continue to amortize the existingDPAC and related actuarial balances. Recoverability.DPAC and sales inducement assets are subject to recoverability testing at the time of policy issue and loss recognition testing on an annual basis, or when an event occurs that may warrant loss recognition. Likewise, PVFP is subject to impairment testing on an annual basis, or when an event occurs that may warrant impairment. If loss recognition or impairment is necessary, the asset balances are written off to the extent that it is determined that future policy premiums and investment income or gross profits are not adequate to cover related losses and expenses. Sensitivities. We perform sensitivity analyses to assess the impact that certain assumptions have on ourDPAC and related actuarial balances. The following table shows the estimated immediate impact of various assumption changes on ourDPAC and related actuarial balances as ofMarch 31, 2012 . The net balance ofDPAC and related actuarial balances, excluding balances affected by changes in other comprehensive income, was a$2,508.2 million asset. Estimated impact to net income (1) (in millions) Reducing the future equity return assumption by 1% $ (5 )
Reducing the long-term general account net investment returns assumption by 0.5% (2)
(45 ) A one-time, 10% drop in equity market values (13 )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Reflects the net impact of changes to theDPAC asset, sales inducement asset, unearned revenue liability, reinsurance asset or liability, PVFP and additional benefit reserves. Includes the impact on net income of changes inDPAC and related balances for our equity method subsidiaries. TheDPAC and related balances of the equity method subsidiaries are not included in the totalDPAC balance listed above as they are not fully consolidated.
(2) Net investment return represents net investment income plus net realized capital gains (losses).
92 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents Recent Event AFP Cuprum S.A. OnOctober 8, 2012 , we announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire Cuprum, a leading pension manager inChile . The agreement requiresEmpresas Penta S.A. and Inversiones Banpenta Limitada to sell their 63% ownership in Cuprum pursuant to a public tender offer that will also include the remaining 37% of publicly traded shares. Based on current exchange rates, the purchase price for 100% of Cuprum is approximately$1.5 billion . The transaction is expected to close in first quarter 2013, upon receipt of regulatory approval inChile .
Transactions Affecting Comparability of Results of Operations
Acquisitions
We entered into acquisition agreements for the following businesses during 2012 and 2011.
Claritas Administração de Recursos Ltda./Claritas Investments, Ltd. OnApril 2, 2012 , we finalized the purchase of a 60% indirect ownership inClaritas Administração de Recursos Ltda./Claritas Investments, Ltd. ("Claritas"), a leading Brazilian mutual fund and asset management company. TheSao Paulo -based company manages equity funds, balanced funds, managed accounts and other strategies for affluent clients and institutions through its multi-channel distribution network.Claritas had$1.8 billion in AUM at the time of acquisition and is consolidated within thePrincipal International segment.Origin Asset Management LLP . OnOctober 3, 2011 , we finalized the purchase of a 74% interest inOrigin Asset Management LLP ("Origin"), a global equity specialist based inLondon . The initial payment was$63.6 million . Origin had$2.6 billion in AUM in global and international equities at the time of the acquisition and is consolidated within thePrincipal Global Investors segment.HSBC AFORE, S.A. de C.V. OnAugust 8, 2011 , we finalized the purchase of our 100% interest inHSBC AFORE, S.A. de C.V. ("HSBC AFORE"), a Mexican pension business, from HSBC Bank for$206.1 million . In addition, we and HSBC Bank have established a distribution arrangement for the distribution of Principal AFORE's products through HSBC Bank's extensive network inMexico . HSBC AFORE was merged into our Principal AFORE pension company, which is consolidated within thePrincipal International segment.Finisterre Capital LLP andFinisterre Holdings Limited . OnJuly 1, 2011 , we finalized the purchase of a 51% interest inFinisterre Capital LLP andFinisterre Holdings Limited , (together "Finisterre Capital "), an emerging markets debt investor based inLondon . The initial payment was$84.6 million , with a possible additional contingent payment of up to$30.0 million in 2013, dependent upon performance targets.Finisterre Capital had$1.7 billion in AUM at the time of acquisition and is accounted for on the equity method within thePrincipal Global Investors segment. Other Actuarial Assumption Updates. During the third quarter of 2012, we reviewed and updated assumptions that are inputs to the models forDPAC and other actuarial balances. We also reviewed our actuarial models and made improvements as necessary. As a result of these actions, we had an unlocking ofDPAC and other actuarial balances that decreased total company net income by$96.7 million for both the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 . We updated our actuarial models to reflect the lower interest rate environment in our U.S. operations. The updates to our long-term interest rate assumptions and related refinements to the interest rate component of our actuarial models resulted in an unlocking that negatively impacted operating earnings. The negative unlocking from the lower interest rates was partially offset by the positive impact from the increased expected persistency in our individual annuities business. The net negative segment operating earnings impact was$66.3 million , which was comprised of$55.2 million for ourU.S. Insurance Solutions segment and$11.1 million for our Retirement and Investor Services segment. In addition to the interest rate assumption update, we updated other assumptions and made model refinements that resulted in a net negative unlocking and a$24.4 million decrease to operating earnings in total for the Retirement and Investor Services,Principal International andU.S. Insurance Solutions segments for both the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 . Within our individual life insurance business, we have an integrated actuarial model that impacts several line items within our income statement. Operating earnings for the individual life insurance business was negatively impacted$62.9 million for both the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 . The impact on the income statement line items was as follows - fee revenues 93 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
increased
Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc. InJuly 2012 ,Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc. merged with a wholly-owned subsidiary ofSXC Health Solutions Corp. As a result of the merger, we realized an after-tax gain. We subsequently contributed appreciated stock of the ultimate surviving corporation (now known as Catamaran Corp.) toThe Principal Financial Group Foundation, Inc. and sold our remaining interest in Catamaran Corp., resulting in a total after-tax net realized capital gain of$141.2 million . Individual Life Insurance Amortization. During the first quarter of 2012, our individual life insurance business changed its basis for amortizingDPAC and other actuarial balances on a portion of our universal life insurance products. The actuarial balances for these products are now amortized based on estimated gross revenues instead of EGPs. This change required an unlocking of the actuarial balances to reflect the pattern of estimated gross revenues, which resulted in volatility within certain income statement line items. Specifically, fee revenues decreased$46.6 million ; benefits, claims and settlement expenses increased$87.9 million ; and operating expenses decreased$139.6 million . However, on a net basis the impact was a net gain of$3.3 million after-tax, which is not material. Individual Life Insurance Assumption Changes. During the second quarter of 2011, we updated premium assumptions in our individual life insurance business, which impacts comparability between reported time periods. Specifically, fee revenues increased$4.9 million ; benefits, claims and settlement expenses increased$43.1 million ; and operating expenses increased$14.9 million . Given the large magnitude of the assumption changes, we removed the after-tax impact of$(34.5) million from operating earnings and reported it as an other after-tax adjustment in order to aid in comparability at the segment level.Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc. In earlyApril 2011 , we sold a portion of our interest inCatalyst Health Solutions, Inc. , which was accounted for on the equity method. The$46.0 million after-tax gain was reported as a net realized capital gain in the second quarter of 2011. The remaining portion of the investment continued to be accounted for as an equity method investment. Group Medical Insurance Business. OnSeptember 30, 2010 , we announced our decision to exit the group medical insurance business (insured and administrative services only) and entered into an agreement withUnited Healthcare Services, Inc. to renew group medical insurance coverage for our customers as the business transitions. The exiting of the group medical insurance business does not qualify for discontinued operations treatment under U.S. GAAP. Therefore, the results of operations for the group medical insurance business are still included in our consolidated income from continuing operations. With the exception of corporate overhead, amounts related to our group medical insurance business previously included in segment operating earnings have been removed from operating earnings for all periods presented and are reported as other after-tax adjustments. The operating revenues associated with our exited group medical insurance business were$1.2 million and$117.7 million for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and$24.1 million and$553.4 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The other after-tax adjustments associated with the after-tax earnings (loss) of our exited group medical insurance business were$(4.1) million and$14.9 million for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and$(9.6) million and$50.8 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Fluctuations in Foreign Currency to U.S. Dollar Exchange Rates
Fluctuations in foreign currency to U.S. dollar exchange rates for countries in which we have operations can affect reported financial results. In years when foreign currencies weaken against the U.S. dollar, translating foreign currencies into U.S. dollars results in fewer U.S. dollars to be reported. When foreign currencies strengthen, translating foreign currencies into U.S. dollars results in more U.S. dollars to be reported. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations create variances in our financial statement line items but have not had a material impact on our consolidated financial results.Principal International segment operating earnings were negatively impacted by$5.9 million and$14.3 million for the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 , as a result of fluctuations in foreign currency to U.S. dollar exchange rates. For a discussion of our approaches to managing foreign currency exchange rate risk, see Item 3. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Foreign Currency Risk."
Stock-Based Compensation Plans
For information related to our Stock-Based Compensation Plans, see Item 1. "Financial Statements, Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12, Stock-Based Compensation Plans."
94 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Employee and Agent Benefits Expense
The 2012 annual defined benefit pension expense for substantially all of our employees and certain agents is expected to be$122.1 million pre-tax, which is a$29.4 million increase from the 2011 pre-tax pension expense of$92.7 million . This increase is primarily due to a decrease in the discount rates as ofDecember 31, 2011 , increasing the service cost, interest cost, and gain/loss amortization. Pre-tax pension expense of$30.7 million and$92.2 million was reflected in the determination of net income for the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 , respectively. The 2012 annual other postretirement employee benefit ("OPEB") plan expense (income) for retired employees is expected to be$(55.9) million pre-tax, which is a$2.1 million decrease from the 2011 pre-tax OPEB plan income of$(58.0) million . This decrease in income is primarily due to a reduction in the prior service credit to be recognized. The 2011 expense included$(5.1) million in one-time credits due to the curtailment from the group medical insurance business exit. Pre-tax (income) ofand $(38.8) million was reflected in the determination of net income for the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 , respectively. Recent Accounting Changes For recent accounting changes, see Item 1. "Financial Statements, Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 1, Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies" under the captions, "Accounting Changes" and "Recent Accounting Pronouncements." 95 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents Results of Operations The following table presents summary consolidated financial information for the periods indicated: For the three months ended September 30, For the nine months ended September 30, Increase Increase 2012 2011 (decrease) 2012 2011 (decrease) (in millions)
Revenues:
Premiums and other considerations $ 1,158.2 $ 672.7 $ 485.5 $ 2,519.3 $ 2,221.7 $ 297.6 Fees and other revenues 675.0 636.4 38.6 1,909.1 1,892.6 16.5 Net investment income 783.8 815.2 (31.4 ) 2,409.6 2,548.6 (139.0 ) Net realized capital gains, excluding impairment losses on available-for-sale securities 122.1 16.9 105.2 176.4 99.6 76.8 Total other-than-temporary impairment losses on available-for-sale securities (43.6 ) (12.7 ) (30.9 ) (126.4 ) (67.6 ) (58.8 ) Other-than-temporary impairment losses on fixed maturities, available-for-sale reclassified to (from) other comprehensive income 9.2 (34.9 ) 44.1 31.2 (83.0 ) 114.2 Net impairment losses on available-for-sale securities (34.4 ) (47.6 ) 13.2 (95.2 ) (150.6 ) 55.4 Net realized capital gains (losses) 87.7 (30.7 ) 118.4 81.2 (51.0 ) 132.2 Total revenues 2,704.7 2,093.6 611.1 6,919.2 6,611.9 307.3 Expenses: Benefits, claims and settlement expenses 1,647.0 1,114.9 532.1 3,969.5 3,497.7 471.8 Dividends to policyholders 49.7 52.2 (2.5 ) 149.5 158.7 (9.2 ) Operating expenses 826.6 775.4 51.2 2,106.7 2,232.7 (126.0 ) Total expenses 2,523.3 1,942.5 580.8 6,225.7 5,889.1 336.6 Income before income taxes 181.4 151.1 30.3 693.5 722.8 (29.3 ) Income taxes (benefits) (9.9 ) 76.6 (86.5 ) 99.2 190.3 (91.1 ) Net income 191.3 74.5 116.8 594.3 532.5 61.8 Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest 3.4 (5.6 ) 9.0 15.3 36.6 (21.3 ) Net income attributable to Principal Financial Group, Inc. 187.9 80.1 107.8 579.0 495.9 83.1 Preferred stock dividends 8.2 8.2 - 24.7 24.7 - Net income available to common stockholders $ 179.7 $ 71.9 $ 107.8 $ 554.3 $ 471.2 $ 83.1
Three Months Ended
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders
Net income available to common stockholders increased primarily due to a$141.2 million after-tax gain associated with the merger ofCatalyst Health Solutions, Inc. and the subsequent disposition of our remaining interest in the surviving corporation during the third quarter of 2012 and a negative impact of a court ruling on some uncertain tax positions in the third quarter of 2011 with no corresponding activity in the third quarter of 2012. These increases were partially offset by the negative impact related to the third quarter 2012 unlocking ofDPAC and other actuarial balances associated with assumptions changes and model refinements. Total Revenues
Premiums increased
96 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
million decrease for the Corporate segment primarily due to a reduction in average covered medical members in our exited group medical insurance business.
Fee revenues increased$27.8 million for the Retirement and Investor Services segment primarily due to higher fee income stemming from an increase in average account values, which resulted from generally positive equity market performance since the third quarter of 2011. In addition, fee revenues increased$13.4 million for theU.S. Insurance Solutions segment primarily due to unlocking of unearned revenue associated with a change in our long-term interest rate assumptions and model refinements. Fee revenues also increased$12.6 million for thePrincipal International segment primarily due to higher investment management fees driven by higher average AUM as a result of the HSBC AFORE acquisition inMexico and theClaritas acquisition inBrazil . Fee revenues for thePrincipal Global Investors segment increased$10.4 million primarily due to higher fee revenues driven by an increase in average AUM. Partially offsetting these increases was a$25.6 million decrease in fee revenues for the Corporate segment primarily due to a reduction in average fee-for-service members in our exited group medical insurance business.
Net investment income decreased primarily due to lower inflation-based investment returns on average invested assets and cash as a result of lower inflation in
Net realized capital gains (losses) can be volatile due to other-than-temporary impairments of invested assets, mark-to-market adjustments of certain invested assets and our decision to sell invested assets. Net realized capital gains (losses) increased primarily due to a gain associated with the merger ofCatalyst Health Solutions, Inc. and the subsequent disposition of our remaining interest in the surviving corporation, which was partially offset by losses versus gains attributable to the GMWB embedded derivative and related hedging instruments. For additional information, see "Investments - Investment Results." Total Expenses
Benefits, claims and settlement expenses increased
Operating expenses increased primarily due toDPAC unlocking associated with assumptions changes and model refinements and a charitable contribution of appreciated stock toThe Principal Financial Group Foundation, Inc. in the third quarter of 2012. These increases were partially offset by a favorableDPAC true-up resulting from generally positive equity market performance in 2012 compared to negative equity market performance in 2011. Income Taxes The effective income tax rates were -5% and 51% for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The effective income tax rate for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2012 , was lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to income tax deductions allowed for corporate dividends received, tax benefits associated with a contribution of appreciated stock made toThe Principal Financial Group Foundation, Inc. and a third quarter adjustment to reflect a decrease in our estimated annual effective income tax rate. The effective income tax rate for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2011 , was higher than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the impact of a court ruling on some uncertain tax positions, which was partially offset by income tax deductions allowed for corporate dividends received, the presentation of taxes on our share of earnings generated from equity method investments in net investment income and the interest exclusion from taxable income. The effective income tax rate decreased to -5% from 51% for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, primarily due to the impact of a third quarter 2011 court ruling on some uncertain tax positions and tax benefits associated with a third quarter 2012 contribution of appreciated stock made toThe Principal Financial Group Foundation, Inc.
Nine Months Ended
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders
Net income available to common stockholders increased primarily due to higher gains associated with the merger ofCatalyst Health Solutions, Inc. and the subsequent disposition of our remaining interest in the surviving corporation in 2012 compared to the portion of our interest sold in 2011 and a negative impact of a court ruling on some uncertain tax positions in 2011 with no corresponding activity in 2012. These increases were partially offset by the negative impact related to the unlocking ofDPAC and other actuarial balances associated with assumptions changes and model refinements in 2012. 97 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents Total Revenues Premiums increased$718.5 million for the Retirement and Investor Services segment primarily due to an increase in sales of single premium group annuities with life contingencies in our full service payout business. Partially offsetting this increase was a$474.5 million decrease for the Corporate segment primarily due to a reduction in average covered medical members in our exited group medical insurance business. Fee revenues increased$37.8 million for thePrincipal International segment primarily due to higher investment management fees driven by higher average AUM as a result of the HSBC AFORE acquisition inMexico and theClaritas acquisition inBrazil . Fee revenues also increased$33.7 million for the Retirement and Investor Services segment primarily due to higher fee income stemming from an increase in average account values, which resulted from generally positive equity market performance since the third quarter of 2011. In addition, fee revenues increased$29.3 million for thePrincipal Global Investors segment primarily due to an increase in average AUM and higher real estate transaction fees resulting from higher transaction volumes. Partially offsetting these increases was a$61.2 million decrease in fee revenues for the Corporate segment primarily due to a reduction in average fee-for-service members in our exited group medical insurance business. Fee revenues also decreased$23.1 million for theU.S. Insurance Solutions segment primarily due to the unlocking of unearned revenue associated with the change in basis for amortizingDPAC and other actuarial balances in the first quarter of 2012 offset by growth in the universal life and variable universal life lines of business and unlocking associated with a change in our long-term interest rate assumptions and model refinements in the third quarter of 2012. Net investment income decreased primarily due to lower investment yields in our U.S. operations, lower inflation-based investments returns on average invested assets and cash as a result of lower inflation inChile and the weakening of the Chilean peso against the U.S. dollar. For additional information, see "Investments - Investment Results." Net realized capital gains (losses) can be volatile due to other-than-temporary impairments of invested assets, mark-to-market adjustments of certain invested assets and our decision to sell invested assets. Net realized capital gains (losses) increased primarily due to higher gains associated with the merger ofCatalyst Health Solutions, Inc. and the subsequent disposition of our remaining interest in the surviving corporation in 2012 compared to the portion of our interest sold in 2011 and a decrease in credit impairments on fixed maturities, available-for-sale. For additional information, see "Investments - Investment Results." Total Expenses Benefits, claims and settlement expenses increased$665.3 million for the Retirement and Investor Services segment primarily due to an increase in change in reserves resulting from an increase in sales of single premium group annuities with life contingencies in our full service payout business. In addition, benefits, claims and settlement expenses increased$181.7 million for ourU.S. Insurance Solutions segment primarily due to unlocking associated with the change in basis for amortizingDPAC and other actuarial balances in the first quarter of 2012 and a change in our long-term interest rate assumptions and model refinements in the third quarter of 2012. Partially offsetting these increases was a$359.3 million decrease in benefits, claims and settlement expenses for the Corporate segment primarily due to a reduction in average covered medical members in our exited group medical insurance business.U.S. Insurance Solutions operating expenses decreased$117.5 million primarily due to the impact of unlocking associated with the change in basis for amortizingDPAC and other actuarial balances in the first quarter of 2012, which was partially offset by a change in our long-term interest rate assumptions and model refinements in the third quarter of 2012. Income Taxes The effective income tax rates were 14% and 26% for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The effective income tax rate for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 , was lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to income tax deductions allowed for corporate dividends received, the presentation of taxes on our share of earnings generated from equity method investments in net investment income and tax benefits associated with the contribution of appreciated stock made toThe Principal Financial Group Foundation, Inc. The effective income tax rate for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2011 , was lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to income tax deductions allowed for corporate dividends received, the presentation of taxes on our share of earnings generated from equity method investments in net investment income and the interest exclusion from taxable income, which were partially offset by the impact of a court ruling on some uncertain tax positions. The effective income tax rate decreased to 14% from 26% for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, primarily due to the impact of a 2011 court ruling on some uncertain tax positions and tax benefits associated with a 2012 contribution of appreciated stock made toThe Principal Financial Group Foundation, Inc. 98 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Results of Operations by Segment
For results of operations by segment see Item 1. "Financial Statements, Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 11, Segment Information."
Retirement and Investor Services Segment
Retirement and Investor Services Segment Summary Financial Data
Growth in earnings of the segment should generally track with, yet will typically be less than, the percentage growth in account values. This trend may vary due to changes in business and/or product mix. Net cash flow and market performance are the two main drivers of account value growth. Net cash flow reflects the segment's ability to attract and retain client deposits. Market performance reflects not only the equity market performance, but also the investment performance of fixed income investments supporting our spread business.
The following table presents the Retirement and Investor Services account value rollforward for the periods indicated:
For the three months ended For the nine months ended September 30, September 30, 2012 2011 2012 2011 (in billions)
Account values, beginning of period $ 197.8 $ 187.1 $ 183.3 $ 178.3 Net cash flow
4.7 0.1 9.6 1.6 Credited investment performance 7.5 (15.5 ) 17.3 (8.1 ) Other - (0.2 ) (0.2 ) (0.3 ) Account values, end of period $ 210.0 $ 171.5 $ 210.0 $ 171.5
The following table presents certain summary financial data relating to the Retirement and Investor Services segment for the periods indicated:
For the three months ended September 30, For the nine months ended September 30, Increase Increase 2012 2011 (decrease) 2012 2011 (decrease) (in millions) Operating revenues: Premiums and other considerations $ 651.5 $ 82.9 $ 568.6 $ 978.2 $ 259.7 $ 718.5 Fees and other revenues 382.1 354.3 27.8 1,121.3 1,087.7 33.6 Net investment income 537.1 558.8 (21.7 ) 1,607.5 1,710.7 (103.2 ) Total operating revenues 1,570.7 996.0 574.7 3,707.0 3,058.1 648.9 Expenses: Benefits, claims and settlement expenses, including dividends to policyholders 1,021.6 488.5 533.1 2,085.2 1,474.3 610.9 Operating expenses 375.8 343.7 32.1 1,080.0 1,014.2 65.8 Total expenses 1,397.4 832.2 565.2 3,165.2 2,488.5 676.7 Operating earnings before income taxes 173.3 163.8 9.5 541.8 569.6 (27.8 ) Income taxes 35.8 34.2 1.6 119.0 131.2 (12.2 ) Operating earnings $ 137.5 $ 129.6 $ 7.9 $ 422.8 $ 438.4 $ (15.6 )
Three Months Ended
Operating Earnings Operating earnings increased$5.2 million in our individual annuities business primarily due to an increase in fees and a favorableDPAC true-up resulting from generally positive equity market performance in 2012 compared to negative equity market performance in 2011, which was partially offset by negativeDPAC unlocking due to a change in our long-term interest rate assumptions in the third quarter of 2012. In addition, operating earnings increased$2.0 million in our full service accumulation business primarily due to a lower effective income tax rate and an increase fee revenue, which was partially offset by higher staff related costs. 99
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents Operating Revenues Premiums increased$543.4 million in our full service payout business primarily due to an increase in sales of single premium group annuities with life contingencies. The single premium product, which is typically used to fund defined benefit plan terminations, can generate large premiums from very few customers and therefore tends to vary from period to period. Fee revenues increased$16.0 million and$8.5 million in our Principal Funds and full service accumulation businesses, respectively, primarily due to higher fee income stemming from an increase in average account values, which resulted from generally positive equity market performance since the third quarter of 2011.
Net investment income decreased primarily due to lower investment yields.
Total Expenses Benefits, claims and settlement expenses increased$546.4 million in our full service payout business primarily due to an increase in change in reserves resulting from an increase in sales of single premium group annuities with life contingencies. Operating expenses increased$17.3 million in our full service accumulation business primarily due to higher staff related costs, including pension and other postretirement benefits. In addition, operating expenses increased$13.1 million in our Principal Funds business primarily due to higher distribution costs resulting from an increase in sales and an increase in management fees stemming from an increase in average account values. Income Taxes The effective income tax rate for the segment was 21% for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011. The effective income tax rate was lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to income tax deductions allowed for corporate dividends received and the interest exclusion from taxable income.
Nine Months Ended
Operating Earnings Operating earnings decreased$5.1 million in our full service accumulation business primarily due to shifts in mix of business, economic pressures on fee revenue and higher staff related costs, including pension and other postretirement benefits. In addition, operating earnings decreased$4.0 million in our bank and trust services business primarily due to an estimated expense for a legal settlement accrual in 2012. Furthermore, operating earnings decreased$2.9 million in our individual annuities business primarily due to higher staff related costs, including pension and other postretirement benefits, and negativeDPAC unlocking due to a change in our long-term interest rate assumptions, which was mostly offset by a favorableDPAC true-up resulting from generally positive equity market performance in 2012 compared to negative equity market performance in 2011. Operating Revenues Premiums increased$673.3 million in our full service payout business primarily due to an increase in sales of single premium group annuities with life contingencies. The single premium product, which is typically used to fund defined benefit plan terminations, can generate large premiums from very few customers and therefore tends to vary from period to period. Fee revenues increased$26.0 million and$7.6 million in our Principal Funds and individual annuities businesses, respectively, primarily due to higher fee income stemming from an increase in average account values, which resulted from generally positive equity market performance since the third quarter of 2011.
Net investment income decreased primarily due to lower investment yields.
Total Expenses Benefits, claims and settlement expenses increased$670.0 million in our full service payout business primarily due to an increase in change in reserves resulting from an increase in sales of single premium group annuities with life contingencies. Operating expenses increased$26.1 million and$8.4 million in our full service accumulation and individual annuities businesses, respectively, primarily due to higher staff related costs, including pension and other postretirement benefits. In addition, operating expenses increased$25.7 million in our Principal Funds business primarily due to an increase in management fees stemming 100 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
from an increase in average account values and, to a lesser extent, higher staff related costs, including pension and other postretirement benefits.
Income Taxes The effective income tax rates for the segment were 22% and 23% for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The effective income tax rates were lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to income tax deductions allowed for corporate dividends received and the interest exclusion from taxable income.
Principal Global Investors Segment
Principal Global Investors Segment Summary Financial Data
AUM is a key indicator of earnings growth for ourPrincipal Global Investors segment, as AUM is the base by which we generate revenues. Net cash flow and market performance are the two main drivers of AUM growth. Net cash flow reflects our ability to attract and retain client deposits. Market performance reflects equity, fixed income and real estate market performance. The percentage growth in earnings of the segment will generally track with the percentage growth in AUM. This trend may vary due to changes in business and/or product mix.
The following table presents the AUM rollforward for assets managed by
For the three months ended September 30, For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 2011 2012 2011 (in billions) AUM, beginning of period $ 243.9 $ 226.0 $ 227.8 $ 220.1 Net cash flow 4.6 1.0 11.2 (2.2 ) Investment performance 8.8 (12.5 ) 20.1 (2.4 ) Operations acquired (1) - 1.7 - 1.7 Other 1.1 1.1 (0.7 ) 0.1 AUM, end of period $ 258.4 $ 217.3 $ 258.4 $ 217.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Reflects the acquisition of
The following table presents certain summary financial data relating to the
For the three months ended September 30, For the nine months ended September 30, Increase Increase 2012 2011 (decrease) 2012 2011 (decrease) (in millions) Operating revenues: Fees and other revenues $ 141.2 $ 130.8
$ 10.4 $ 413.8 $ 384.5 $ 29.3 Net investment income
2.8 2.1 0.7 9.4 10.0 (0.6 ) Total operating revenues 144.0 132.9 11.1 423.2 394.5 28.7
Expenses:
Total expenses 110.0 102.6 7.4 332.1 304.2 27.9 Operating earnings before income taxes and noncontrolling interest 34.0 30.3 3.7 91.1 90.3 0.8 Income taxes 10.5 10.3 0.2 29.4 30.4 (1.0 ) Operating earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest 2.9 0.9 2.0 6.7 3.4 3.3 Operating earnings $ 20.6 $ 19.1 $ 1.5 $ 55.0 $ 56.5 $ (1.5 ) 101
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended
Operating Earnings
Operating earnings increased primarily due to higher fee revenues driven by an increase in average AUM. These increases were partially offset by higher compensation and operating costs resulting from continued investment in the global business model.
Income Taxes The effective income tax rates for the segment were 31% and 34% for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The effective income tax rates were lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the inclusion of income attributable to noncontrolling interest in operating earnings before income taxes with no corresponding change in income taxes reported by us as the controlling interest.
Nine Months Ended
Operating Earnings Operating earnings decreased primarily due to higher compensation and operating costs resulting from continued investment in the global business model and other one-time costs during 2012. These increases in expenses were partially offset by higher fee revenues driven by an increase in average AUM, as well as increased real estate transaction fees resulting from higher transaction volumes. Income Taxes The effective income tax rates for the segment were 32% and 34% for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The effective income tax rates were lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the inclusion of income attributable to noncontrolling interest in operating earnings before income taxes with no corresponding change in income taxes reported by us as the controlling interest.
Principal International Segment
Principal International Segment Summary Financial Data
AUM is a key indicator of earnings growth for the segment, as AUM is the base by which we can generate local currency profits. Net customer cash flow and market performance are the two main drivers of local currency AUM growth. Net customer cash flow reflects our ability to attract and retain client deposits. Market performance reflects the investment returns on our underlying AUM. The percentage growth or decline in the earnings of ourPrincipal International segment will generally track with the percentage growth or decline in AUM. This trend may vary due to changes in business and/or product mix. Our financial results are also impacted by fluctuations of the foreign currency to U.S. dollar exchange rates for the countries in which we have business. AUM of our foreign subsidiaries is translated into U.S. dollar equivalents at the end of the reporting period using the spot foreign exchange rates. Revenue and expenses for our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollar equivalents at the average foreign exchange rates for the reporting period. The following table presents thePrincipal International segment AUM rollforward for the periods indicated: For the three months ended September 30, For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 2011 2012 2011 (in billions) AUM, beginning of period $ 60.3 $ 53.0 $ 52.8 $ 45.8 Net cash flow 2.7 0.7 7.3 3.8 Investment performance 1.9 0.5 5.5 2.2 Operations acquired (1) 0.2 3.1 2.0 3.1 Effect of exchange rates 1.1 (2.7 ) (1.2 ) - Other - (0.1 ) (0.2 ) (0.4 ) AUM, end of period $ 66.2 $ 54.5 $ 66.2 $ 54.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Reflects the acquisition of
102 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table presents certain summary financial data of the
For the three months ended September 30, For the nine months ended September 30, Increase Increase 2012 2011 (decrease) 2012 2011 (decrease) (in millions) Operating revenues: Premiums and other considerations $ 65.3 $ 69.2 $ (3.9 ) $ 213.6 $ 193.0 $ 20.6 Fees and other revenues 58.5 45.9 12.6 159.2 121.4 37.8 Net investment income 80.0 105.0 (25.0 ) 304.1 339.0 (34.9 ) Total operating revenues 203.8 220.1 (16.3 ) 676.9 653.4 23.5 Expenses: Benefits, claims, and settlement expenses 109.4 137.6 (28.2 ) 401.8 419.2 (17.4 ) Operating expenses 65.1 45.7 19.4 165.9 131.7 34.2 Total expenses 174.5 183.3 (8.8 ) 567.7 550.9 16.8 Operating earnings before income taxes and noncontrolling interest 29.3 36.8 (7.5 ) 109.2 102.5 6.7 Income taxes (benefits) (0.6 ) 1.6 (2.2 ) 0.6 3.2 (2.6 ) Operating earnings (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interest 0.4 (0.1 ) 0.5 0.4 (0.1 ) 0.5 Operating earnings $ 29.5 $ 35.3 $ (5.8 ) $ 108.2 $ 99.4 $ 8.8
Three Months Ended
Operating Earnings
Operating earnings decreased primarily due to unlocking of PVFP and
Operating Revenues Premiums decreased$3.9 million inChile primarily due to lower sales of single premium annuities with life contingencies and the weakening of the Chilean peso against the U.S. dollar. Fees and other revenues increased primarily due to higher investment management fees driven by higher average AUM as a result of the HSBC AFORE acquisition inMexico and theClaritas acquisition inBrazil . These increases were partially offset by the weakening of the Latin American currencies against the U.S. dollar.
Net investment income decreased primarily due to lower inflation-based investment returns on average invested assets and cash as a result of lower inflation in
Total Expenses
Benefits, claims and settlement expenses decreased
Operating expenses increased primarily due to unlocking of PVFP and
Income Taxes The effective income tax rates for the segment were -2% and 4% for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The effective income tax rates were lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the presentation of taxes on our share of earnings generated from our equity method investments. Specifically, our share of earnings generated from equity method investments, net of foreign taxes incurred, are reported within net investment income whereas any residual U.S. tax expense or benefit related to equity 103 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
method investments is reported in income taxes. Lower tax rates of foreign jurisdictions also contributed to the lower effective income tax rates.
Nine Months Ended
Operating Earnings Operating earnings increased primarily due to higher fees driven by higher average AUM inMexico as a result of the HSBC AFORE acquisition and higher earnings in our equity method investment inBrazil . These increases were partially offset by the weakening of the Latin American currencies against the U.S. dollar, the unlocking of PVFP andDPAC associated with assumptions changes inMexico and lower inflation-based investment returns on average invested assets and cash as a result of lower inflation inChile . Operating Revenues
Premiums increased
Fees and other revenues increased primarily due to higher investment management fees driven by higher average AUM as a result of the HSBC AFORE acquisition inMexico and theClaritas acquisition inBrazil , which was partially offset by the weakening of the Latin American currencies against the U.S. dollar. Net investment income decreased primarily due to lower inflation-based investment returns on average invested assets and cash as a result of lower inflation inChile and the weakening of the Latin American currencies against the U.S. dollar. These decreases were partially offset by higher earnings in our equity method investment inBrazil . Total Expenses Benefits, claims and settlement expenses decreased$17.2 million inChile primarily due to lower inflation-based interest crediting rates to customers and the weakening of the Chilean peso against the U.S. dollar, which were partially offset by an increase in the change in reserves related to higher sales of single premium annuities with life contingencies. Operating expenses increased primarily due to unlocking of PVFP andDPAC associated with assumption changes inMexico , higher expenses related to theClaritas acquisition inBrazil and higher compensation costs across the segment. These increases were partially offset by the weakening of the Latin American currencies against the U.S. dollar. Income Taxes The effective income tax rates for the segment were 1% and 3% for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The effective income tax rates were lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to taxes on our share of earnings generated from our equity method investments. Specifically, our share of earnings generated from equity method investments, net of foreign taxes incurred, are reported within net investment income whereas any residual U.S. tax expense or benefit related to equity method investments is reported in income taxes. Lower tax rates of foreign jurisdictions also contributed to the lower effective income tax rates.
U.S. Insurance Solutions Segment
Individual Life Insurance Trends
Our life insurance premiums and fees are influenced by both economic and industry trends. We have been primarily focused on marketing our universal and variable universal life insurance products. As such, premiums related to our traditional life insurance products have declined for several years. To address recent economic and industry trends, we introduced new term products in 2011. 104
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table provides a summary of our individual universal and variable universal life insurance fee revenues and our individual traditional life insurance premiums for the periods indicated:
For the three months ended For the nine months ended September 30, September 30, 2012 2011 2012 2011 (in millions) Universal and variable universal life insurance fee revenues (1) $ 138.5 $ 123.7 $ 331.7 $ 349.8 Traditional life insurance premiums 122.0 122.1 371.0 375.5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Fee revenues for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2012 , reflect a$13.5 million increase due to unearned revenue unlocking associated with a change in our long-term interest rate assumptions and model refinements. Fee revenues for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 , also reflect a$46.6 million reduction due to unlocking of unearned revenue associated with the change in basis for amortizingDPAC and other actuarial balances in the first quarter of 2012.
Specialty Benefits Insurance Trends
Premium and fees in our specialty benefits insurance business are also influenced by economic and industry trends. Premium and fees have risen more slowly in recent years due to more moderate increases in underlying salaries and lower membership in existing group contracts. We are seeing signs of improvement in both areas.
The following table provides a summary of our specialty benefits insurance premium and fees for the periods indicated:
For the three months ended For the nine months ended September 30, September 30, 2012 2011 2012 2011 (in millions) Premium and fees: Group dental and vision insurance $ 144.0 $ 141.4 $ 431.8 $ 415.6 Group life insurance 81.6 77.5 245.4 238.5 Group disability insurance 73.5 68.2 217.1 205.3 Individual disability insurance 59.7 55.1 174.7 160.6 Wellness 1.8 1.7 6.8 6.9
U.S. Insurance Solutions Segment Summary Financial Data
There are several key indicators for earnings growth in ourU.S. Insurance Solutions segment. The ability of our distribution channels to generate new sales and retain existing business drives growth in our block of business, premium revenue and fee revenues. Our earnings growth also depends on our ability to price our products at a level that enables us to earn a margin over the cost of providing benefits and the expense of acquiring and administering those products. Factors impacting pricing decisions include competitive conditions, economic trends, persistency, our ability to assess and manage trends in mortality and morbidity and our ability to manage operating expenses. 105
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table presents certain summary financial data relating to the
For the three months ended September 30, For the nine months ended September 30, Increase Increase 2012 2011 (decrease) 2012 2011 (decrease) (in millions) Operating revenues: Premiums and other considerations $ 441.3 $ 428.9 $
12.4 $ 1,324.7 $ 1,291.7 $ 33.0 Fees and other revenues (1)
151.7 137.9 13.8 373.1 391.1 (18.0 ) Net investment income 173.5 172.5 1.0 517.2 519.2 (2.0 ) Total operating revenues 766.5 739.3 27.2 2,215.0 2,202.0 13.0
Expenses:
Benefits, claims and settlement expenses (1) 524.4 411.8 112.6 1,494.9 1,261.1 233.8 Dividends to policyholders 49.2 51.4 (2.2 ) 148.0 156.8 (8.8 ) Operating expenses (1) 229.2 204.1 25.1 460.8 562.3 (101.5 ) Total expenses 802.8 667.3 135.5 2,103.7 1,980.2 123.5 Operating earnings (losses) before income taxes (36.3 ) 72.0 (108.3 ) 111.3 221.8 (110.5 ) Income taxes (benefits) (14.7 ) 22.9 (37.6 ) 32.5 70.3 (37.8 )
Operating earnings (losses) (1) $ (21.6 ) $ 49.1 $
(70.7 ) $ 78.8 $ 151.5 $ (72.7 )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) For further details related to the impact associated with the actuarial assumption updates and the change in basis for amortizingDPAC and other actuarial balances on results for the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 see, "Transactions Affecting Comparability of Results of Operations - Actuarial Assumption Updates" and "Individual Life Insurance Amortization."
Three Months Ended
Operating Earnings Operating earnings in our individual life insurance business decreased$66.1 million primarily due to unlocking associated with a change in our long-term interest rate assumptions and model refinements. Operating earnings in our specialty benefits insurance business decreased$4.6 million primarily due to higher disability claims and staff related costs, including pension and other postretirement benefits. Operating Revenues
Premiums increased
Fees and other revenues increased
Total Expenses Benefits, claims and settlement expenses increased$96.4 million in our individual life insurance business primarily due to unlocking associated with a change in our long-term interest rate assumptions and model refinements and the impact associated with the change in basis for amortizingDPAC and other actuarial balances in 2012. Benefits, claims and settlement expenses increased$16.2 million in our specialty benefits business due to growth in the block of business and higher disability claims. Operating expenses increased$16.9 million in our individual life insurance business primarily due to unlocking associated a change in our long-term interest rate assumptions and model refinements, which was partially offset by the impact associated with the change in basis for amortizingDPAC and other actuarial balances in 2012. Operating expenses increased$8.2 million in our specialty benefits insurance business primarily due to growth in the block of business and higher staff related costs, including pension and other postretirement benefits. Income Taxes The effective income tax rates for the segment were 40% and 32% for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The effective income tax rate for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2012 , reflects the pre-tax operating loss incurred 106
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
and the benefits from the interest exclusion from taxable income and income tax deductions allowed for corporate dividends received. The effective income tax rate for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2011 , was lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the interest exclusion from taxable income and income tax deductions allowed for corporate dividends received.
Nine Months Ended
Operating Earnings Operating earnings in our individual life insurance business decreased$61.4 million primarily due to unlocking associated with a change in our long-term interest rate assumptions and model refinements in the third quarter of 2012. Operating earnings in our specialty benefits insurance business decreased$11.3 million due to higher disability claims and staff related costs, including pension and other postretirement benefits, and lower investment yields. Operating Revenues Premiums increased$47.9 million in our specialty benefits insurance business due to growth in the block of business. Premiums decreased$14.9 million in our individual life insurance business due to higher ceded premiums in the universal life and variable universal life lines of business and the expected continued decline from our traditional life insurance business. Fees and other revenues decreased$18.9 million in our individual life insurance business primarily due to the unlocking of unearned revenue associated with the change in basis for amortizingDPAC and other actuarial balances in the first quarter of 2012 offset by growth in the universal life and variable universal life lines of business and unlocking associated with a change in our long-term interest rate assumptions and model refinements in the third quarter of 2012. Total Expenses Total expenses increased$63.7 million in our individual life insurance business primarily due to unlocking associated with a change in our long-term interest rate assumptions and model refinements in the third quarter of 2012 and growth in the block of business partially offset by the impact associated with the change in basis for amortizingDPAC and other actuarial balances in the first quarter of 2012. Total expenses increased$59.8 million in our specialty benefits insurance business primarily due to growth in the block of business, higher disability claims and staff related costs, including pension and other postretirement benefits. Income Taxes The effective income tax rates for the segment were 29% and 32% for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The effective income tax rates were lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to interest exclusion from taxable income and income tax deductions allowed for corporate dividends received. Corporate Segment
Corporate Segment Summary Financial Data
The following table presents certain summary financial data relating to the Corporate segment for the periods indicated:
For the three months ended September 30, For the nine months ended September 30, Increase Increase 2012 2011 (decrease) 2012 2011 (decrease) (in millions) Operating revenues: Total operating revenues $ (46.4 ) $ (56.6 ) $ 10.2 $ (139.8 ) $ (130.3 ) $ (9.5 ) Expenses: Total expenses (6.4 ) (4.0 ) (2.4 ) (18.4 ) (5.8 ) (12.6 ) Operating losses before income taxes, preferred stock dividends and noncontrolling interest (40.0 ) (52.6 ) 12.6 (121.4 ) (124.5 ) 3.1 Income tax benefits (17.1 ) (20.9 ) 3.8 (45.4 ) (48.3 ) 2.9 Preferred stock dividends 8.2 8.2 - 24.7 24.7 - Operating earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest 0.1 - 0.1 - 2.9 (2.9 ) Operating losses $ (31.2 ) $ (39.9 ) $ 8.7 $ (100.7 ) $ (103.8 ) $ 3.1 107
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended
Operating Losses
Operating losses decreased primarily due to an increase in earnings on average invested assets for the segment, representing capital that has not been allocated to any other segment.
Nine Months Ended
Operating Losses Operating losses decreased primarily due to a reduction in corporate overhead expenses needed to support the exited group medical insurance business. Partially offsetting the decrease is a change in income tax reserves established forIRS tax matters.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity and capital resources represent the overall strength of a company and its ability to generate strong cash flows, borrow funds at a competitive rate and raise new capital to meet operating and growth needs. Our legal entity structure has an impact on our ability to meet cash flow needs as an organization. Following is a simplified organizational structure. [[Image Removed]] Our liquidity requirements have been and will continue to be met by funds from consolidated operations as well as the issuance of commercial paper, common stock, debt or other capital securities and borrowings from credit facilities. We believe that cash flows from these sources are sufficient to satisfy the current liquidity requirements of our operations, including reasonably foreseeable contingencies. We maintain a level of cash and securities which, combined with expected cash inflows from investments and operations, is believed to be adequate to meet anticipated short-term and long-term payment obligations. We will continue our prudent capital management practice of regularly exploring options available to us to maximize capital flexibility, including accessing the capital markets and careful attention to and management of expenses. Our liquidity is supported by a portfolio of U.S. government and agency and residential pass-through government-backed securities, of which we held$4.5 billion as ofSeptember 30, 2012 , that may be utilized to bolster our liquidity position, as collateral for secured borrowing transactions with various third parties or by disposing of the securities in the open market, if needed. As ofSeptember 30, 2012 , approximately$10.5 billion , or 99%, of our institutional guaranteed investment contracts and funding agreements cannot be redeemed by contractholders prior to maturity. Our life insurance and annuity liabilities contain provisions limiting early surrenders. As ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , we had short-term credit facilities with various financial institutions in an aggregate amount of$914.7 million and$725.0 million , respectively. As ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , we had$28.5 million and$105.2 million , respectively, of outstanding borrowings related to our credit facilities, with no assets pledged as support as ofSeptember 30, 2012 . None of these credit arrangements, other than our commercial paper back-stop facility, are committed facilities. Due to the financial strength and the strong relationships we have with these providers, as well as the small size of these facilities, we are comfortable that there is a very low risk that the financial institutions would not be able to fund these facilities. During the first quarter of 2012, we refinanced our$579.0 million revolving credit agreement that serves as a back-stop to our commercial paper program. The new facility, effectiveMarch 30, 2012 , was increased to$800.0 million . This facility provides 100% back-stop support for our commercial paper program. The credit agreement is broken into two tranches, a$500.0 million four year facility that matures inMarch 2016 , and a$300 million 364-day facility. The four year facility is set up with PFG, PFS and Principal Life as co-borrowers; the 364-day facility is for 108 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Principal Life only. The facility is supported by eighteen banks, most if not all of which have other relationships with us. We have no reason to believe that our current providers would be unable or unwilling to fund the facility if necessary. As ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , commercial paper outstanding was$0.0 million and$50.0 million , respectively. The Holding Companies:Principal Financial Group, Inc. andPrincipal Financial Services, Inc. The principal sources of funds available to our parent holding company, PFG, to meet its obligations, including the payments of dividends on common stock, debt service and the repurchase of stock, are dividends from subsidiaries as well as its ability to borrow funds at competitive rates and raise capital to meet operating and growth needs. Dividends from Principal Life, our primary subsidiary, are limited byIowa law. UnderIowa laws, Principal Life may pay dividends only from the earned surplus arising from its business and must receive the prior approval of the Insurance Commissioner of theState of Iowa ("the Commissioner") to pay stockholder dividends or make any other distribution if such distributions would exceed certain statutory limitations.Iowa law gives the Commissioner discretion to disapprove requests for distributions in excess of these limits. In general, the current statutory limitations are the greater of (i) 10% of Principal Life's statutory policyholder surplus as of the previous year-end or (ii) the statutory net gain from operations from the previous calendar year. Based on these limitations, Principal Life could distribute approximately$507.7 million in 2012. Total stockholder dividends paid by Principal Life to its parent as ofSeptember 30, 2012 , were$525.0 million , which were approved by the Commissioner. Operations. Our primary consolidated cash flow sources are premiums from insurance products, pension and annuity deposits, asset management fee revenues, administrative services fee revenues, income from investments and proceeds from the sales or maturity of investments. Cash outflows consist primarily of payment of benefits to policyholders and beneficiaries, income and other taxes, current operating expenses, payment of dividends to policyholders, payments in connection with investments acquired, payments made to acquire subsidiaries, payments relating to policy and contract surrenders, withdrawals, policy loans, interest expense and repayment of short-term debt and long-term debt. Our investment strategies are generally intended to provide adequate funds to pay benefits without forced sales of investments. For a discussion of our investment objectives, strategies and a discussion of duration matching, see "Investments" as well as Item 3. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Interest Rate Risk."
Cash Flows. Activity, as reported in our consolidated statements of cash flows, provides relevant information regarding our sources and uses of cash.
Net cash provided by operating activities was$ 2,373.7 million and$1,885.4 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. From our insurance business, we typically generate positive cash flows from operating activities, as premiums collected from our insurance products and income received from our investments exceed policy acquisition costs, benefits paid, redemptions and operating expenses. These positive cash flows are then invested to support the obligations of our insurance and investment products and required capital supporting these products. Our cash flows from operating activities are affected by the timing of premiums, fees and investment income received and benefits and expenses paid. The increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2012 compared to 2011 was the result of increased cash flows from trading securities as well as an increase in premiums, fees and other revenue received. These increases were partially offset by fluctuations in receivables and payables associated with the timing of settlements as well as a decrease in sales of development real estate properties in the current year compared to 2011. Net cash used in investing activities was$1,719.2 million and$89.1 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in cash used in investing activities in 2012 compared to 2011 was primarily the result of an increase in net purchases of investments in 2012 compared to net sales and maturities of investments in 2011. Net cash used in financing activities was$1,209.4 million and$2,239.5 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease in cash used in financing activities was primarily due to the issuance of senior notes in 2012, with no corresponding activity in the prior year. Also contributing to the decrease in cash used in financing activities is a decrease in net withdrawals of investment contracts, for which we have had net withdrawals in both 2012 and 2011, primarily due to our decision to scale back our investment only business. These were partially offset by an increase in common stock dividends in 2012 as a result of moving to a quarterly dividend beginning in 2012. Shelf Registration. OnMay 24, 2011 , our shelf registration statement was filed with theSEC and became effective. The shelf registration replaces the shelf registration that had been in effect sinceJune 2008 . Under our current shelf registration, we have the ability to issue in unlimited amounts, unsecured senior debt securities or subordinated debt securities, junior subordinated debt, preferred stock, common stock, warrants, depository shares, stock purchase contracts and stock purchase units of PFG, trust preferred securities of three subsidiary trusts and guarantees by PFG of these trust preferred securities. Our wholly owned subsidiary, PFS, may guarantee, fully and unconditionally or otherwise, our obligations with respect to any non-convertible securities, other than common stock, described in the shelf registration. Preferred Stock Dividend Restrictions and Payments. The certificates of designation for the Series A and B Preferred Stock restrict the declaration of preferred dividends if we fail to meet specified capital adequacy, net income or stockholders' equity levels. As 109 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
ofSeptember 30, 2012 , we have no preferred dividend restrictions. The dividend payments on our preferred stock are not mandatory or cumulative, as our Board of Directors approves each quarterly dividend payment.
Short-Term Debt. The components of short-term debt as of
September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 (in millions) Commercial paper $ - $ 50.0 Other recourse short-term debt 28.5 55.2 Total short-term debt $ 28.5 $ 105.2
Long-Term Debt. For Long-Term debt information, see Item 1. "Financial Statements, Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, Debt."
Stockholders' Equity. The following table summarizes our return of capital to common stockholders. September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 (in millions) Dividends to stockholders $ (169.6 ) $ (213.7 ) Repurchase of common stock (272.7 ) (556.4 ) Total cash returned to stockholders $ (442.3 ) $ (770.1 )
For additional stockholders' equity information, see Item 1. "Financial Statements, Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 9, Stockholders' Equity."
Capitalization
Our capital structure as of
September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 (in millions) Debt: Short-term debt $ 28.5 $ 105.2 Long-term debt 2,180.0 1,564.8 Total debt 2,208.5 1,670.0 Stockholders' equity: Equity excluding AOCI 8,946.7 8,759.9
Total capitalization excluding AOCI $ 11,155.2 $ 10,429.9 Debt to equity excluding AOCI
25 % 19 % Debt to capitalization excluding AOCI 20 % 16 % As ofSeptember 30, 2012 , we had$1,227.1 million of excess capital in the holding companies, consisting of cash and highly liquid assets available for debt maturities, interest, preferred stock dividends and other holding company obligations. In addition, we continue to maintain sufficient capital levels in Principal Life based on our current financial strength ratings.
Contractual Obligations and Contractual Commitments
As of
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Variable Interest Entities. We have relationships with various types of special purpose entities and other entities where we have a variable interest as described in Item 1. "Financial Statements, Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2, Variable Interest Entities."
Guarantees and Indemnifications. As of
110 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
indemnifications sinceDecember 31, 2011 . For guarantee and indemnification information, see Item 1. "Financial Statements, Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8, Contingencies, Guarantees and Indemnifications" under the caption, "Guarantees and Indemnifications."
Financial Strength Rating and Credit Ratings
Our ratings are influenced by the relative ratings of our peers/competitors as well as many other factors including our operating and financial performance, asset quality, liquidity, asset/liability management, overall portfolio mix, financial leverage (i.e., debt), risk exposures, operating leverage, ratings and other factors.A.M. Best Company, Inc. ,Fitch Rating Ltd. , Moody's Investors Service and S&P publish financial strength ratings on U.S. life insurance companies that are indicators of an insurance company's ability to meet contractholder and policyholder obligations. These rating agencies also assign credit ratings on non-life insurance entities, such as PFG and PFS. Credit ratings are indicators of a debt issuer's ability to meet the terms of debt obligations in a timely manner, and are important factors in overall funding profile and ability to access external capital. Such ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. Ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency.A.M. Best , Fitch, and S&P maintain a stable outlook on the U.S. life insurance sector. However, these rating agencies note that current challenges for the industry such as global sovereign uncertainty, equity market volatility, impact of sustained low interest rates, weakness in the real estate market, lingering unemployment and weak consumer confidence are putting pressure on the stable outlook. InSeptember 2012 Moody's changed its outlook on the U.S. life insurance industry to negative. The change to negative was driven largely by Moody's expectation that interest rates will remain in the low single-digits for the next few years and the U.S. will have continued below-trend economic growth. This along with prolonged equity market volatility will continue to hurt insurers' earnings and revenues and weaken financial flexibility. InOctober 2012 when PFG announced that it had signed a definitive agreement to acquire Cuprum, the rating agencies affirmed the financial strength and debt ratings assigned toPrincipal Financial Group entities; however, Fitch, Moody's and S&P all changed the outlook to 'negative' from 'stable'. AM Best maintained the 'stable' outlook. The rating affirmation from all agencies reflects that the acquisition is a good strategic fit and that Cuprum is recognized as a leading player in the mandatory pension market inChile . The negative outlooks reflect integration risk exists and the acquisition puts some pressure on debt and coverage ratios. The following table summarizes our significant financial strength and debt ratings from the major independent rating organizations. The debt ratings shown are indicative ratings. Outstanding issuances are rated the same as indicative ratings unless otherwise noted. Actual ratings can differ from indicative ratings based on contractual terms. Standard & A.M. Best Fitch Poor's Moody'sPrincipal Financial Group Senior Unsecured Debt (1) a- BBB+ Baa1 Preferred Stock (2) bbb BBB- Baa3Principal Financial Services Senior Unsecured Debt BBB+ A3 Commercial Paper AMB-1 A-2 P-2Principal Life Insurance Company Insurer Financial Strength A+ AA- A+ Aa3 Commercial Paper AMB-1+ A-1 P-1 Surplus Notes a A- A2 Enterprise Risk Management Rating StrongPrincipal National Life Insurance Company Insurer Financial Strength A+ AA- A+ Aa3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Moody's has rated
(2) S&P has rated
Fair Value Measurement Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels for disclosure purposes. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority (Level 1) to quoted 111
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and gives the lowest priority (Level 3) to unobservable inputs. An asset or liability's classification within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of significant input to its valuation. See Item 1. "Financial Statements, Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 10, Fair Value Measurements" for further details, including a reconciliation of changes in Level 3 fair value measurements. As ofSeptember 30, 2012 , 40% of our net assets (liabilities) were Level 1, 56% were Level 2 and 4% were Level 3. Excluding separate account assets as ofSeptember 30, 2012 , 1% of our net assets (liabilities) were Level 1, 98% were Level 2 and 1% were Level 3. As ofDecember 31, 2011 , 41% of our net assets (liabilities) were Level 1, 55% were Level 2 and 4% were Level 3. Excluding separate account assets as ofDecember 31, 2011 , 3% of our net assets (liabilities) were Level 1, 96% were Level 2 and 1% were Level 3.
Changes in Level 3 fair value measurements
Net assets (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as ofSeptember 30, 2012 , were$4,852.2 million as compared to$4,647.3 million as ofDecember 31, 2011 . The increase was primarily related to gains on other invested assets and real estate included in our separate account assets. This increase was largely offset by sales and net transfers out of Level 3 into Level 2 for certain fixed maturities, available-for-sale. The transfers out of Level 3 were due to our obtaining prices from third party pricing vendors or using internal models based on substantially observable market information versus relying on broker quotes or utilizing significant unobservable inputs. Net assets (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as ofSeptember 30, 2011 , were$4,333.4 million as compared to$4,691.4 million as ofDecember 31, 2010 . The decrease was primarily due to net transfers out of Level 3 and into Level 2. These transfers included certain private corporate bonds we are now able to price using a matrix valuation approach as well as certain separate account assets for which we were now able to obtain pricing from a recognized third party pricing vendor. Investments We had total consolidated assets as ofSeptember 30, 2012 , of$159,193.3 million , of which$69,268.3 million were invested assets. The rest of our total consolidated assets are comprised primarily of separate account assets for which we do not bear investment risk. Because we generally do not bear any investment risk on assets held in separate accounts, the discussion and financial information below does not include such assets.
Overall Composition of Invested Assets
Invested assets as ofSeptember 30, 2012 , were predominantly high quality and broadly diversified across asset class, individual credit, industry and geographic location. Asset allocation is determined based on cash flow and the risk/return requirements of our products. As shown in the following table, the major categories of invested assets are fixed maturities and commercial mortgage loans. The remainder is invested in other investments, residential mortgage loans, real estate and equity securities. In addition, policy loans are included in our invested assets. 112
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of ContentsSeptember 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 Carrying amount % of total
Carrying amount % of total
($ in millions) Fixed maturities: Public $ 36,944.4 53 % $ 35,350.3 53 % Private 15,397.5 22 14,628.1 22 Equity securities 381.2 1 481.9 1 Mortgage loans: Commercial 9,935.7 14 9,396.6 14 Residential 1,362.2 2 1,330.6 2 Real estate held for sale 68.2 - 44.8 - Real estate held for investment 1,140.4 2 1,048.1 2 Policy loans 866.6 1 885.1 1 Other investments 3,172.1 5 2,985.8 5 Total invested assets 69,268.3 100 % 66,151.3 100 % Cash and cash equivalents 2,279.0 2,833.9 Total invested assets and cash $ 71,547.3 $ 68,985.2 Investment Results Net Investment Income The following table presents the yield and investment income, excluding net realized capital gains and losses, for our invested assets for the periods indicated. We calculate annualized yields using a simple average of asset classes at the beginning and end of the reporting period. The yields for fixed maturities and equity securities are calculated using amortized cost and cost, respectively. All other yields are calculated using carrying amounts. For the three months ended September 30, Increase (decrease) For the nine months ended
2012 2011 2012 vs. 2011 2012 2011 2012 vs. 2011 Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount ($ in millions) Fixed maturities 4.9 % $ 598.8 5.5 % $ 664.9 (0.6 )% $ (66.1 ) 5.1 % $ 1,857.3 5.5 % $ 2,014.9 (0.4 )% $ (157.6 ) Equity securities 3.6 3.3 2.4 3.2 1.2 0.1 3.6 11.7 3.0 11.1 0.6 0.6 Mortgage loans - commercial 5.7 140.9 5.9 139.7 (0.2 ) 1.2 5.8 420.6 5.8 420.3 - 0.3 Mortgage loans - residential 4.0 13.7 5.6 19.8 (1.6 ) (6.1 ) 5.3 53.8 6.2 67.0 (0.9 ) (13.2 ) Real estate 7.8 23.2 7.3 18.3 0.5 4.9 5.5 47.8 8.3 65.1 (2.8 ) (17.3 ) Policy loans 6.1 13.2 6.6 14.5 (0.5 ) (1.3 ) 6.2 40.8 6.5 43.5 (0.3 ) (2.7 ) Cash and cash equivalents 0.5 2.6 0.8 3.6 (0.3 ) (1.0 ) 0.4 6.9 0.6 7.0 (0.2 ) (0.1 ) Other investments 1.0 7.7 (3.8 ) (28.5 ) 4.8 36.2 1.4 31.9 (0.8 ) (18.2 ) 2.2 50.1 Total before investment expenses 4.8 803.4 5.0
835.5 (0.2 ) (32.1 ) 4.8 2,470.8 5.2
2,610.7 (0.4 ) (139.9 ) Investment expenses (0.1 ) (19.6 ) (0.1 ) (20.3 ) - 0.7 (0.1 ) (61.2 ) (0.1 ) (62.1 ) - 0.9 Net investment income 4.7 % $ 783.8 4.9 % $
815.2 (0.2 )% $ (31.4 ) 4.7 % $ 2,409.6 5.1 % $ 2,548.6 (0.4 )% $ (139.0 )
Three Months Ended
Net investment income decreased due to lower reinvestment yields within our fixed maturities portfolio and lower inflation-based investment returns on average invested assets and cash as a result of lower inflation inChile , which was partially offset by lower income in the prior year due to net mark-to-market losses on certain trading portfolios of derivatives and fixed maturities.
Nine Months Ended
Net investment income decreased due to lower reinvestment yields within our fixed maturities portfolio and lower inflation-based investment returns on average invested assets and cash as a result of lower inflation inChile and the weakening of the Chilean peso against the U.S. dollar as well as a decrease in gains on the sale of development real estate.
Net Realized Capital Gains (Losses)
The following table presents the contributors to net realized capital gains and losses for our invested assets for the periods indicated.
113 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents For the three months ended Increase For the nine months ended Increase September 30, (decrease) September 30, (decrease) 2012 2011 2012 vs. 2011 2012 2011 2012 vs. 2011 (in millions) Fixed maturities, available-for-sale - credit impairments (1) $ (34.3 ) $ (46.1 ) $ 11.8 $ (95.1 ) $ (139.8 ) $ 44.7 Fixed maturities, available-for-sale - other 2.4 3.3 (0.9 ) 18.0 5.9 12.1 Fixed maturities, trading 4.7 (11.2 ) 15.9 5.7 (12.5 ) 18.2 Equity securities - credit impairments (0.1 ) 0.1 (0.2 ) (0.1 ) (2.3 ) 2.2 Derivatives and related hedge activities (2) (74.8 ) 30.0 (104.8 ) (30.1 ) (4.5 ) (25.6 ) Commercial mortgages (4.0 ) (5.3 ) 1.3 (11.9 ) (17.5 ) 5.6 Other gains (losses) 193.8 (1.5 ) 195.3 194.7 119.7 75.0 Net realized capital gains (losses) $ 87.7 $ (30.7 ) $ 118.4 $ 81.2 $ (51.0 ) $ 132.2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Includes credit impairments as well as losses on sales
of
fixed maturities to reduce credit risk, net of realized credit recoveries on the sale of previously impaired securities. Credit gains on sales, excluding associated foreign currency fluctuations that are included in derivatives and related hedging activities, were a net gain of$0.0 million and$1.6 million for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively and$0.0 million and$8.9 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. (2) Includes fixed maturities, available-for-sale
impairment-related net gains of
Three Months Ended
Net realized capital losses on fixed maturities, available-for-sale - credit impairments decreased primarily due to lower impairments on commercial mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities as a result of improved market conditions.
Net realized capital gains on fixed maturities, trading increased due to mark-to-market gains versus losses due to tightening of credit spreads in 2012 and a widening of credit spreads in 2011.
Net realized capital losses on derivatives and related hedge activities increased due to losses versus gains on the GMWB embedded derivatives, including losses versus gains from changes in the spread reflecting our own creditworthiness, and related hedging instruments. These losses were partially offset by gains versus losses on currency forwards and currency swaps not designated as hedging instruments due to changes in exchange rates.
Other net realized capital gains increased due to
Nine Months Ended
Net realized capital losses on fixed maturities, available-for-sale - credit impairments decreased primarily due to lower impairments on commercial mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities as a result of improved market conditions.
Net realized capital gains on fixed maturities, trading increased due to mark-to-market gains versus losses due to tightening of credit spreads in 2012 and a widening of credit spreads in 2011.
Net realized capital losses on derivatives and related hedge activities increased due to losses versus gains on the GMWB embedded derivatives, including losses versus gains from changes in the spread reflecting our own creditworthiness, and related hedging instruments. These losses were partially offset by gains versus losses on currency forwards and currency swaps not designated as hedging instruments due to changes in exchange rates. Other net realized capital gains increased in the third quarter of 2012 due to$184.3 million of net gains related to the merger ofCatalyst Health Solutions, Inc. and the subsequent disposition of our remaining interest in the merged entity. The second quarter of 2011 included a net realized capital gain of$70.9 million resulting from the sale of a portion of our interest inCatalyst Health Solutions, Inc. 114 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents U.S. Investment Operations Of our invested assets,$63,345.7 million were held by our U.S. operations as ofSeptember 30, 2012 . Our U.S. invested assets are managed primarily by ourPrincipal Global Investors segment. Our primary investment objective is to maximize after-tax returns consistent with acceptable risk parameters. We seek to protect policyholders' benefits by optimizing the risk/return relationship on an ongoing basis, through asset/liability matching, reducing the credit risk, avoiding high levels of investments that may be redeemed by the issuer, maintaining sufficiently liquid investments and avoiding undue asset concentrations through diversification. We are exposed to two primary sources of investment risk:
† credit risk, relating to the uncertainty associated with the continued ability of a given obligor to make timely payments of principal and interest and
† interest rate risk, relating to the market price and/or cash flow variability associated with changes in market yield curves.
Our ability to manage credit risk is essential to our business and our profitability. We devote considerable resources to the credit analysis of each new investment. We manage credit risk through industry, issuer and asset class diversification. Our Investment Committee, appointed by our Board of Directors, is responsible for establishing all investment policies and approving or authorizing all investments, except the Executive Committee of the Board must approve any investment transaction exceeding$500.0 million . As ofSeptember 30, 2012 , there are twelve members on the Investment Committee, one of whom is a member of our Board of Directors. The remaining members are senior management members representing various areas of our company. We also seek to reduce call or prepayment risk arising from changes in interest rates in individual investments. We limit our exposure to investments that are prepayable without penalty prior to maturity at the option of the issuer and we require additional yield on these investments to compensate for the risk that the issuer will exercise such option. We assess option risk in all investments we make and, when we take that risk, we price for it accordingly. Our Fixed Income Securities Committee, consisting of fixed income securities senior management members, approves the credit rating for the fixed maturities we purchase. Teams of security analysts, organized by industry, analyze and monitor these investments. In addition, we have teams who specialize in RMBS, CMBS, ABS, municipals and below investment grade securities. Our analysts monitor issuers held in the portfolio on a continuous basis with a formal review documented annually or more frequently if material events affect the issuer. The analysis includes both fundamental and technical factors. The fundamental analysis encompasses both quantitative and qualitative analysis of the issuer. The qualitative analysis includes an assessment of both accounting and management aggressiveness of the issuer. In addition, technical indicators such as stock price volatility and credit default swap levels are monitored. Our Fixed Income Securities Committee also reviews private transactions on a continuous basis to assess the quality ratings of our privately placed investments. We regularly review our investments to determine whether we should re-rate them, employing the following criteria: † material declines in the issuer's revenues or margins; † significant management or organizational changes; † significant uncertainty regarding the issuer's industry;
† debt service coverage or cash flow ratios that fall below industry-specific thresholds;
† violation of financial covenants and † other business factors that relate to the issuer. A dedicated risk management team is responsible for centralized monitoring of the commercial mortgage loan portfolio. We apply a variety of strategies to minimize credit risk in our commercial mortgage loan portfolio. When considering the origination of new commercial mortgage loans, we review the cash flow fundamentals of the property, make a physical assessment of the underlying security, conduct a comprehensive market analysis and compare against industry lending practices. We use a proprietary risk rating model to evaluate all new and substantially all existing loans within the portfolio. The proprietary risk model is designed to stress projected cash flows under simulated economic and market downturns. Our lending guidelines are typically 65% or less loan-to-value ratio and a debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.5 times. We analyze investments outside of these guidelines based on cash flow quality, tenancy and other factors. The following table presents loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios for our brick and mortar commercial mortgages, excludingPrincipal Global Investors segment mortgages: 115 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents Weighted average loan-to-value ratio
Debt service coverage ratio
September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 New mortgages 48 % 45 % 3.0x 3.3x Entire mortgage portfolio 56 % 60 % 2.1x 2.0x Our investment decisions and objectives are a function of the underlying risks and product profiles of each primary business operation. In addition, we diversify our product portfolio offerings to include products that contain features that will protect us against fluctuations in interest rates. Those features include adjustable crediting rates, policy surrender charges and market value adjustments on liquidations. For further information on our management of interest rate risk, see Item 3. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Interest Rate Risk."
Overall Composition of U.S. Invested Assets
As shown in the following table, the major categories of U.S. invested assets are fixed maturities and commercial mortgage loans. The remainder is invested in other investments, real estate, residential mortgage loans and equity securities. In addition, policy loans are included in our invested assets. The following discussion analyzes the composition of U.S. invested assets, but excludes invested assets of the separate accounts. September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 Carrying amount % of total Carrying amount % of total ($ in millions) Fixed maturities: Public $ 33,254.6 52 % $ 32,081.2 53 % Private 15,397.5 24 14,628.1 24 Equity securities 259.8 1 395.9 1 Mortgage loans: Commercial 9,922.4 16 9,386.0 15 Residential 690.2 1 746.0 1 Real estate held for sale 60.5 - 36.6 - Real estate held for investment 1,139.5 2 1,047.3 2 Policy loans 840.0 1 861.6 1 Other investments 1,781.2 3 1,783.5 3 Total invested assets 63,345.7 100 % 60,966.2 100 % Cash and cash equivalents 2,157.2 2,741.7 Total invested assets and cash $ 65,502.9 $ 63,707.9 Fixed Maturities Fixed maturities consist of publicly traded and privately placed bonds, asset-backed securities, redeemable preferred stock and certain nonredeemable preferred stock. Included in the privately placed category as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , were$9.8 billion and$9.1 billion , respectively, of securities subject to certain holding periods and resale restrictions pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. Fixed maturities include trading portfolios that support investment strategies that involve the active and frequent purchase and sale of fixed maturities. We held$173.7 million and$279.1 million of these trading securities as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , respectively. 116 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Fixed maturities were diversified by category of issuer, as shown in the following table for the periods indicated.
September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 Carrying amount % of total
Carrying amount % of total
($ in
millions)
U.S. government and agencies $ 1,121.7 2 % $ 1,004.7 2 % States and political subdivisions 3,397.7 7 3,041.1 7 Non-U.S. governments 655.6 1 676.1 1 Corporate - public 19,303.8 40 19,194.4 41 Corporate - private 12,794.7 26 11,920.7 26 Residential mortgage-backed pass-through securities 3,333.8 7 3,421.3 7 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 3,841.2 8 3,425.7 7 Residential collateralized mortgage obligations 1,164.9 2 1,403.8 3 Asset-backed securities 3,038.7 7 2,621.5 6 Total fixed maturities $ 48,652.1 100 % $ 46,709.3 100 % We believe that it is desirable to hold residential mortgage-backed pass-through securities due to their credit quality and liquidity as well as portfolio diversification characteristics. Our portfolio is comprised ofGovernment National Mortgage Association , Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation pass-through securities. In addition, our residential collateralized mortgage obligation portfolio offers structural features that allow cash flows to be matched to our liabilities. CMBS provide varying levels of credit protection, diversification and reduced event risk depending on the securities owned and composition of the loan pool. CMBS are predominantly comprised of large pool securitizations that are diverse by property type, borrower and geographic dispersion. The risks to any CMBS deal are determined by the credit quality of the underlying loans and how those loans perform over time. Another key risk is the vintage of the underlying loans and the state of the markets during a particular vintage. In the CMBS market, there is a material difference in the outlook for the performance of loans originated in 2005 and earlier relative to loans originated in 2006 through 2008. For loans originated prior to 2006, underwriting assumptions were more conservative regarding required debt service coverage and loan-to-value ratios. For the 2006 through 2008 vintages, real estate values peaked and the underwriting expectations were that values would continue to increase, which makes those loan values more sensitive to market declines. The 2009 through 2012 vintages represent a return to debt service coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios that more closely resemble loans originated prior to 2006. We purchase ABS to diversify the overall credit risks of the fixed maturities portfolio and to provide attractive returns. The principal risks in holding ABS are structural and credit risks. Structural risks include the security's priority in the issuer's capital structure, the adequacy of and ability to realize proceeds from the collateral and the potential for prepayments. Credit risks involve issuer/servicer risk where collateral values can become impaired in the event of servicer credit deterioration. Our ABS portfolio is diversified both by type of asset and by issuer. We actively monitor holdings of ABS to ensure that the risk profile of each security improves or remains consistent. Prepayments in the ABS portfolio are, in general, insensitive to changes in interest rates or are insulated from such changes by call protection features. In the event that we are subject to prepayment risk, we monitor the factors that impact the level of prepayment and prepayment speed for those ABS. In addition, we diversify the risks of ABS by holding a diverse class of securities, which limits our exposure to any one security. The international exposure held in our U.S. operation's fixed maturities portfolio was 26% of total fixed maturities as ofSeptember 30, 2012 , and 26% as ofDecember 31, 2011 . It is comprised of corporate and foreign government fixed maturities. The following table presents the carrying amount of our international exposure for our U.S. operation's fixed maturities portfolio for the periods indicated. September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 (in millions) European Union $ 4,398.5 $ 4,132.1 United Kingdom 2,698.6 2,329.5 Australia/New Zealand 1,518.8 1,490.1 Asia-Pacific 1,296.2 1,172.3 Latin America 864.7 868.8 Other countries (1) 1,997.8 2,139.8 Total $ 12,774.6 $ 12,132.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Includes exposure from 12 countries as of
117 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
International fixed maturities are determined by the country of domicile of the parent entity of an individual asset. All international fixed maturities held by our U.S. operations are either denominated in U.S. dollars or have been swapped into U.S. dollar equivalents. Our international investments are analyzed internally by country and industry credit investment professionals. We control concentrations using issuer and country level exposure benchmarks, which are based on the credit quality of the issuer and the country. Our investment policy limits total international fixed maturities investments and we are within those internal limits. Exposure toCanada is not included in our international exposure. As ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , our investments inCanada totaled$1,810.0 million and$1,749.1 million , respectively. Economic and fiscal conditions in select European countries, includingGreece ,Ireland ,Italy ,Portugal andSpain , continue to cause credit concerns particularly to financial institutions and banks with exposure to the European periphery region. Our exposure to the region within our U.S. investment operations fixed maturities portfolio is modest and manageable, representing 2.2% and 2.4% of total fixed maturities as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , respectively. Additionally, we did not hold any sovereign debt issuances of the selected countries and had not bought or sold credit protection on sovereign issuances as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 . The fixed maturities within our U.S. operations portfolio with exposure to the region are primarily corporate credit issuances of large multinational companies where the majority of revenues are coming from outside the country where the parent company is domiciled. Our experience indicates multinational companies have demonstrated better market price performance and credit ratings stability. As ofSeptember 30, 2012 , 94% of our total portfolio exposure consists of investment grade bonds with an average price of 102 (carrying value/amortized cost) and a weighted average time to maturity of 5 years.
The following table presents the carrying amount of our European periphery zone fixed maturities exposure for the periods indicated:
September 30, 2012 Select European Exposure Greece Ireland Italy Portugal Spain Total (in millions) Non-Sovereign: Financial institutions $ - $ 59.1 $ 62.1 $ - $ 145.0 $ 266.2 Non-financial institutions 7.2 274.2 231.7 24.9 268.6 806.6 Total $ 7.2 $ 333.3 $ 293.8 $ 24.9 $ 413.6 $ 1,072.8 December 31, 2011 Select European Exposure Greece Ireland Italy Portugal Spain Total (in millions) Non-Sovereign: Financial institutions $ - $ 62.1 $ 53.7 $ - $ 152.2 $ 268.0 Non-financial institutions 7.1 295.5 223.9 19.9 284.5 830.9 Total $ 7.1 $ 357.6 $ 277.6 $ 19.9 $ 436.7 $ 1,098.9 For further details on our International investment operations exposure to these European countries, see "International Investment Operations - Fixed Maturities Exposure." 118
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Fixed Maturities Credit Concentrations. One aspect of managing credit risk is through industry, issuer and asset class diversification. Our credit concentrations are managed to established limits. The following table presents our top ten exposures as ofSeptember 30, 2012 . Amortized cost (in millions) General Electric Co. $ 211.9 AT&T Inc. 196.7 Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 193.0 Wells Fargo & Co. (1) 176.6 Bank of America Corp. (1) 156.5 Republic of Korea 150.7 Prudential Financial Inc. 145.9 JPMorgan Chase & Co. 145.7 Verizon Communications Inc. 143.6 Merck & Co Inc. 142.6 Total top ten exposures $ 1,663.2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Includes actual counterparty exposure. Fixed Maturities Valuation and Credit Quality. Valuation techniques for the fixed maturities portfolio vary by security type and the availability of market data. The use of different pricing techniques and their assumptions could produce different financial results. See Item 1. "Financial Statements, Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 10, Fair Value Measurements" for further details regarding our pricing methodology. Once prices are determined, they are reviewed by pricing analysts for reasonableness based on asset class and observable market data. In addition, investment analysts who are familiar with specific securities review prices for reasonableness through direct interaction with external sources, review of recent trade activity or use of internal models. All fixed maturities placed on the "watch list" are periodically analyzed by investment analysts or analysts that focus on troubled securities ("<org>Workout Group"). This group then meets with the Chief Investment Officer and the Portfolio Managers to determine reasonableness of prices. The valuation of impaired bonds for which there is no quoted price is typically based on the present value of the future cash flows expected to be received. Although we believe these values reasonably reflect the fair value of those securities, the key assumptions about risk premiums, performance of underlying collateral (if any) and other market factors involve qualitative and unobservable inputs. The Securities Valuation Office (''SVO'') of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (''NAIC'') monitors the bond investments of insurers for regulatory capital and reporting purposes and, when required, assigns securities to one of six investment categories. For certain bonds, the NAIC designations closely mirror the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations' ("NRSRO") credit ratings. For most corporate bonds, NAIC designations 1 and 2 include bonds considered investment grade by such rating organizations. Bonds are considered investment grade when rated ''Baa3'' or higher by Moody's, or ''BBB-'' or higher by S&P. NAIC designations 3 through 6 are referred to as below investment grade. Bonds are considered below investment grade when rated ''Ba1'' or lower by Moody's, or ''BB+'' or lower by S&P. However, for loan-backed and structured securities, as defined by the NAIC, the NAIC rating is not always equivalent to an NRSRO rating as described below. For non-agency RMBS, PIMCO Advisors models and assigns the NAIC ratings. For CMBS, Blackrock Solutions undertakes the modeling and assignment of those NAIC ratings. Other loan-backed and structured securities may be subject to an intrinsic price matrix as provided by the NAIC. This may result in a final designation being higher or lower than the NRSRO credit rating. 119 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table presents our total fixed maturities by NAIC designation and the equivalent ratings of the NRSROs as of the periods indicated as well as the percentage, based on fair value, that each designation comprises. September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 % of total % of total NAIC Amortized Carrying carrying Carrying carrying Rating Rating Agency Equivalent cost amount amount Amortized cost amount amount ($ in millions) 1 AAA/AA/A $ 27,043.5 $ 29,065.9 60 % $ 26,802.2 $ 28,115.1 60 % 2 BBB 14,933.0 16,136.2 33 14,570.4 15,195.9 33 3 BB 2,569.4 2,423.8 5 2,537.5 2,405.8 5 4 B 653.2 544.0 1 759.1 582.3 1 5 CCC and lower 456.0 378.4 1 329.4 255.5 1 6 In or near default 202.1 103.8 - 273.4 154.7 - Total fixed maturities $ 45,857.2 $ 48,652.1 100 % $ 45,272.0 $ 46,709.3 100 % Fixed maturities include 21 securities with an amortized cost of$213.1 million , gross gains of$7.7 million , gross losses of$0.1 million and a carrying amount of$220.7 million as ofSeptember 30, 2012 , that are still pending a review and assignment of a rating by the SVO. Due to the timing of when fixed maturities are purchased, legal documents are filed and the review by the SVO is completed, there will always be securities in our portfolio that are unrated over a reporting period. In these instances, an equivalent rating is assigned based on our fixed income analyst's assessment.Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities andHome Equity Asset-Backed Securities Portfolios. As ofSeptember 30, 2012 , based on amortized cost, 54% of our CMBS portfolio had ratings of A or higher and 34% was issued in 2005 or before and 12% of our ABS home equity portfolio had ratings of A or higher and 86% was issued in 2005 or before. The following tables present our exposure by credit quality, based on the lowest NRSRO designation, and year of issuance ("vintage") for our CMBS portfolio as of the periods indicated. September 30, 2012 AAA AA A BBB BB+ and Below Total Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying cost amount cost amount cost amount cost amount cost amount cost amount (in millions) 2003 & Prior $ 45.0 $ 46.1 $ 59.3 $ 59.7 $ 39.5 $ 40.0 $ 68.7 $ 66.3 $ 128.0 $ 97.4 $ 340.5 $ 309.5 2004 78.9 82.1 56.9 59.5 46.7 46.1 32.8 27.9 102.6 80.8 317.9 296.4 2005 337.2 366.9 43.9 49.6 39.9 39.5 70.4 66.5 240.0 152.5 731.4 675.0 2006 142.6 151.8 4.9 5.8 108.5 117.6 42.9 45.6 174.0 119.9 472.9 440.7 2007 132.9 134.5 36.5 39.0 149.1 174.4 266.4 299.5 722.1 471.2 1,307.0 1,118.6 2008 11.2 12.1 15.0 17.7 28.5 34.3 23.5 25.7 31.2 30.8 109.4 120.6 2009 111.7 119.5 86.1 91.8 - - - - - - 197.8 211.3 2010 64.1 71.2 67.0 70.5 - - - - - - 131.1 141.7 2011 95.6 97.7 124.1 129.7 - - - - - - 219.7 227.4 2012 136.5 139.6 154.5 160.4 - - - - - - 291.0 300.0 Total (1) $ 1,155.7 $ 1,221.5 $ 648.2 $ 683.7 $ 412.2 $ 451.9 $ 504.7 $ 531.5 $ 1,397.9 $ 952.6 $ 4,118.7 $ 3,841.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The CMBS portfolio included agency CMBS with a
120 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents December 31, 2011 AAA AA A BBB BB+ and Below Total Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying cost amount cost amount cost amount cost amount cost amount cost amount (in millions) 2003 & Prior $ 147.0 $ 142.3 $ 81.3 $ 81.4 $ 72.2 $ 70.2 $ 94.6 $ 85.2 $ 117.8 $ 79.9 $ 512.9 $ 459.0 2004 146.5 149.6 56.8 56.9 45.2 41.6 25.1 18.8 79.4 54.7 353.0 321.6 2005 362.0 392.4 43.5 48.0 18.3 17.1 77.5 61.6 225.0 128.7 726.3 647.8 2006 203.4 209.2 4.8 5.6 58.6 62.9 14.6 14.5 151.9 89.9 433.3 382.1 2007 292.2 288.9 22.8 25.1 152.7 165.2 300.8 306.6 637.2 347.8 1,405.7 1,133.6 2008 - - 15.0 16.3 33.1 36.4 - - 38.1 32.7 86.2 85.4 2009 123.6 127.5 16.1 16.3 - - - - - - 139.7 143.8 2010 76.2 80.8 7.7 7.6 - - - - - - 83.9 88.4 2011 165.3 164.0 - - - - - - - - 165.3 164.0 Total (1) $ 1,516.2 $ 1,554.7 $ 248.0 $ 257.2 $ 380.1 $ 393.4 $ 512.6 $ 486.7 $ 1,249.4 $ 733.7 $ 3,906.3 $ 3,425.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The CMBS portfolio included agency CMBS with a
The following tables present our exposure by credit quality, based on the lowest NRSRO designation, and vintage for our ABS home equity portfolio supported by subprime first lien mortgages as of the periods indicated. September 30, 2012 AAA AA A BBB BB+ and Below Total Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying cost amount cost amount cost amount cost amount cost amount cost amount (in millions)
2003 & Prior $ 2.3 $ 2.3 $ 4.9 $ 5.0 $
11.5 $ 11.0 $ 18.7 $ 18.2 $ 143.4 $ 123.4 $ 180.8 $ 159.9 2004 - - - - 22.4 22.0 3.2 3.2 45.1 39.3 70.7 64.5 2005 - - - - 3.0 3.1 - - 71.7 52.8 74.7 55.9 2006 - - - - - - - - 14.0 12.7 14.0 12.7 2007 - - - - - - - - 37.1 31.7 37.1 31.7 Total $ 2.3 $ 2.3 $ 4.9 $ 5.0 $ 36.9 $ 36.1 $ 21.9 $ 21.4 $ 311.3 $ 259.9 $ 377.3 $ 324.7 December 31, 2011 AAA AA A BBB BB+ and Below Total Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying Amortized Carrying cost amount cost amount cost amount cost amount cost amount cost amount (in millions)
2003 & Prior $ 12.3
12.7
1.5 1.4 12.6 11.9 8.4 7.8 2.1 2.1 47.1 38.3 71.7 $ 61.5 2005 - - 3.0 3.1 - - - - 67.8 43.3 70.8 $ 46.4 2006 - - - - - - - - 14.9 9.5 14.9 $ 9.5 2007 - - - - - - - - 37.2 27.8 37.2 $ 27.8 Total $ 13.8 $ 13.7 $ 22.9 $ 22.0 $ 21.1 $ 19.8 $ 63.3 $ 56.9 $ 269.7 $ 196.0 $ 390.8 $ 308.4 Fixed Maturities Watch List. We monitor any decline in the credit quality of fixed maturities through the designation of "problem securities," "potential problem securities" and "restructured securities". We define problem securities in our fixed maturity portfolio as securities: (i) as to which principal and/or interest payments are in default or where default is perceived to be imminent in the near term, or (ii) issued by a company that went into bankruptcy subsequent to the acquisition of such securities. We define potential problem securities in our fixed maturity portfolio as securities included on an internal "watch list" for which management has concerns as to the ability of the issuer to comply with the present debt payment terms and which may result in the security becoming a problem or being restructured. The decision whether to classify a performing fixed maturity security as a potential problem involves significant subjective judgments by our management as to the likely future industry conditions and developments with respect to the issuer. We define restructured securities in our fixed maturity portfolio as securities where a concession has been granted to the borrower related to the borrower's financial difficulties that would not have otherwise been considered. We determine that restructures should occur in those instances where greater economic value will be realized under the new terms than through liquidation or other disposition and may involve a change in contractual cash flows. If the present value of the restructured cash flows is less than the current cost of the asset being restructured, a realized capital loss is recorded in net income and a new cost basis is established.
The following table presents the total carrying amount of our fixed maturities portfolio, as well as its problem, potential problem and restructured fixed maturities for the periods indicated.
121 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 ($ in millions) Total fixed maturities (public and private) $ 48,652.1 $ 46,709.3 Problem fixed maturities (1) $ 371.2 $ 343.5 Potential problem fixed maturities 210.4 166.3 Restructured problem fixed maturities 15.1 14.6 Total problem, potential problem and restructured fixed maturities $ 596.7 $ 524.4 Total problem, potential problem and restructured fixed maturities as a percent of total fixed maturities 1.23 % 1.12 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) The problem fixed maturities carrying amount is net of
other-than-temporary impairment losses.
Fixed Maturities Impairments. We have a process in place to identify securities that could potentially have a credit impairment that is other than temporary. This process involves monitoring market events that could impact issuers' credit ratings, business climate, management changes, litigation and government actions and other similar factors. This process also involves monitoring late payments, pricing levels, downgrades by rating agencies, key financial ratios, financial statements, revenue forecasts and cash flow projections as indicators of credit issues. Each reporting period, a group of individuals including the Chief Investment Officer, our Portfolio Managers, members of ourWorkout Group and representatives from Investment Accounting review all securities to determine whether an other-than-temporary decline in value exists and whether losses should be recognized. The analysis focuses on each issuer's ability to service its debts in a timely fashion. Formal documentation of the analysis and our decision is prepared and approved by management. We consider relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating whether a credit or interest-rate related impairment of a security is other than temporary. Relevant facts and circumstances considered include: (1) the extent and length of time the fair value has been below cost; (2) the reasons for the decline in value; (3) the financial position and access to capital of the issuer, including the current and future impact of any specific events; (4) for structured securities, the adequacy of the expected cash flows and (5) our intent to sell the security or whether it is more likely than not we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost which, in some cases, may extend to maturity. To the extent we determine that a security is deemed to be other than temporarily impaired, an impairment loss is recognized. For additional details, see Item 1. "Financial Statements, Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 3, Investments." We would not consider a security with unrealized losses to be other than temporarily impaired when it is not our intent to sell the security, it is not more likely than not that we would be required to sell the security before recovery of the amortized cost, which may be maturity, and we expect to recover the amortized cost basis. However, we do sell securities under certain circumstances, such as when we have evidence of a change in the issuer's creditworthiness, when we anticipate poor relative future performance of securities, when a change in regulatory requirements modifies what constitutes a permissible investment or the maximum level of investments held or when there is an increase in capital requirements or a change in risk weights of debt securities. Sales generate both gains and losses. There are a number of significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the process of monitoring credit impairments and determining if an impairment is other than temporary. These risks and uncertainties include: (1) the risk that our assessment of an issuer's ability to meet all of its contractual obligations will change based on changes in the credit characteristics of that issuer, (2) the risk that the economic outlook will be worse than expected or have more of an impact on the issuer than anticipated, (3) the risk that our investment professionals are making decisions based on fraudulent or misstated information in the financial statements provided by issuers and (4) the risk that new information obtained by us or changes in other facts and circumstances lead us to change our intent to not sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost. Any of these situations could result in a charge to net income in a future period. The net realized loss relating to other-than-temporary credit impairments and credit related sales of fixed maturities was$95.1 million and$144.7 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Fixed Maturities Available-for-Sale
The following tables present our fixed maturities available-for-sale by industry category and the associated gross unrealized gains and losses, including other-than-temporary impairment losses reported in AOCI, as of the periods indicated.
122 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents September 30, 2012 Gross Gross Carrying Amortized cost unrealized gains unrealized losses amount (in millions) Finance - Banking $ 4,364.5 $ 204.5 $ 289.2 $ 4,279.8 Finance - Brokerage 360.7 29.0 1.2 388.5 Finance - Finance Companies 233.7 12.9 0.2 246.4 Finance - Financial Other 514.8 79.0 - 593.8 Finance - Insurance 2,831.2 271.4 23.2 3,079.4 Finance - REITS 1,010.5 60.5 6.1 1,064.9 Industrial - Basic Industry 1,680.8 153.2 2.5 1,831.5 Industrial - Capital Goods 2,044.0 191.6 1.3 2,234.3 Industrial - Communications 2,111.5 250.6 8.5 2,353.6 Industrial - Consumer Cyclical 1,618.4 177.4 3.5 1,792.3 Industrial - Consumer Non-Cyclical 3,412.0 351.8 1.3 3,762.5 Industrial - Energy 2,023.9 293.2 1.5 2,315.6 Industrial - Other 478.8 39.8 - 518.6 Industrial - Technology 863.3 71.3 0.5 934.1 Industrial - Transportation 687.6 62.6 3.0 747.2 Utility - Electric 2,774.0 323.8 12.2 3,085.6 Utility - Natural Gas 1,049.0 133.2 0.8 1,181.4 Utility - Other 250.2 34.7 - 284.9 FDIC guaranteed 5.0 - - 5.0 Government guaranteed 1,119.2 146.6 1.9 1,263.9 Total corporate securities 29,433.1 2,887.1 356.9 31,963.3 Residential mortgage-backed pass-through securities 3,009.0 228.5 0.1 3,237.4 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 4,115.9 211.7 489.2 3,838.4 Residential collateralized mortgage obligations 1,130.3 31.9 12.1 1,150.1 Asset-backed securities - Home equity (1) 377.3 0.8 53.4 324.7 Asset-backed securities - All other 2,238.0 37.1 0.2 2,274.9 Collateralized debt obligations - Credit 79.3 - 42.7 36.6 Collateralized debt obligations - CMBS 95.2 2.4 18.1 79.5 Collateralized debt obligations - Loans 250.4 2.3 2.0 250.7 Collateralized debt obligations - ABS 15.0 - 1.0 14.0 Total mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities 11,310.4 514.7 618.8 11,206.3 U.S. government and agencies 935.6 38.0 - 973.6 States and political subdivisions 2,999.9 251.0 2.8 3,248.1 Non-U.S. governments 573.0 82.6 - 655.6 Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale $ 45,252.0 $ 3,773.4 $ 978.5 $ 48,046.9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) This exposure is all related to sub-prime mortgage loans. 123
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents December 31, 2011 Gross Gross Amortized unrealized unrealized Carrying cost gains losses amount (in millions) Finance - Banking $ 4,520.7 $ 79.9 $ 445.5 $ 4,155.1 Finance - Brokerage 381.0 15.4 6.7 389.7 Finance - Finance Companies 216.2 8.9 4.7 220.4 Finance - Financial Other 532.4 55.5 1.1 586.8 Finance - Insurance 2,966.3 227.2 73.0 3,120.5 Finance - REITS 1,015.2 28.3 22.0 1,021.5 Industrial - Basic Industry 1,656.6 135.3 5.4 1,786.5 Industrial - Capital Goods 2,133.0 146.8 14.3 2,265.5 Industrial - Communications 2,033.2 179.9 23.8 2,189.3 Industrial - Consumer Cyclical 1,606.7 130.5 12.4 1,724.8 Industrial - Consumer Non-Cyclical 3,084.0 286.3 3.7 3,366.6 Industrial - Energy 1,978.4 220.9 1.2 2,198.1 Industrial - Other 596.1 32.5 3.9 624.7 Industrial - Technology 851.3 57.7 9.3 899.7 Industrial - Transportation 626.2 45.7 10.3 661.6 Utility - Electric 2,709.6 276.0 18.9 2,966.7 Utility - Natural Gas 1,034.2 100.2 1.8 1,132.6 Utility - Other 197.1 20.1 - 217.2 FDIC guaranteed 80.0 0.6 - 80.6 Government guaranteed 1,219.0 107.8 7.8 1,319.0 Total corporate securities 29,437.2 2,155.5 665.8 30,926.9 Residential mortgage-backed pass-through securities 3,130.8 185.6 0.7 3,315.7 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 3,894.3 117.0 597.6 3,413.7 Residential collateralized mortgage obligations 1,408.1 32.0 51.5 1,388.6 Asset-backed securities - Home equity (1) 390.8 0.2 82.6 308.4 Asset-backed securities - All other 1,808.0 68.1 2.9 1,873.2 Collateralized debt obligations - Credit 82.8 - 34.4 48.4 Collateralized debt obligations - CMBS 98.7 1.6 18.5 81.8 Collateralized debt obligations - Loans 203.2 0.3 8.8 194.7 Collateralized debt obligations - ABS 15.0 - 1.1 13.9 Total mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities 11,031.7 404.8 798.1 10,638.4 U.S. government and agencies 772.3 32.8 - 805.1 States and political subdivisions 2,670.0 218.2 5.5 2,882.7 Non-U.S. governments 580.7 96.3 0.9 676.1 Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale $ 44,491.9 $ 2,907.6 $ 1,470.3 $ 45,929.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) This exposure is all related to sub-prime mortgage loans. Of the$978.5 million in gross unrealized losses as ofSeptember 30, 2012 , there were$3.6 million in losses attributed to securities scheduled to mature in one year or less,$33.1 million attributed to securities scheduled to mature between one to five years,$13.0 million attributed to securities scheduled to mature between five to ten years,$310.0 million attributed to securities scheduled to mature after ten years and$618.8 million related to mortgage-backed and other ABS that are not classified by maturity year. As ofSeptember 30, 2012 , we were in a$2,794.9 million net unrealized gain position as compared to a$1,437.3 million net unrealized gain position as ofDecember 31, 2011 . Of the$1,357.6 million increase in net unrealized gains for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 , an approximate$0.3 billion increase can be attributed to an approximate 14 basis points decrease in interest rates in addition to other market factors that increased unrealized gains. Fixed Maturities Available-for-Sale Unrealized Losses. We believe that our long-term fixed maturities portfolio is well diversified among industry types and between publicly traded and privately placed securities. Each year, we direct the majority of our net cash inflows into investment grade fixed maturities. Our current policy is to limit the percentage of cash flow invested in below investment grade assets to 10% of cash flow. During 2012, we did not actively increase our investment in available-for-sale below investment grade assets. While Principal Life's general account investment returns have improved due to the below investment grade 124 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
asset class, we manage its growth strategically by limiting it to no more than 10% of the total fixed maturities portfolios.
We invest in privately placed fixed maturities to enhance the overall value of the portfolio, increase diversification and obtain higher yields than are possible with comparable quality public market securities. Generally, private placements provide broader access to management information, strengthened negotiated protective covenants, call protection features and, where applicable, a higher level of collateral. They are, however, generally not freely tradable because of restrictions imposed by federal and state securities laws and illiquid trading markets. The following table presents our fixed maturities available-for-sale by investment grade and below investment grade and the associated gross unrealized gains and losses, including the other-than-temporary impairment losses reported in OCI, as of the periods indicated. September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 Gross Gross Gross Gross Amortized unrealized unrealized Carrying Amortized unrealized unrealized Carrying cost gains losses amount cost gains losses amount (in millions) Investment grade: Public $ 28,833.1 $ 2,659.5 $ 238.8 $
31,253.8
12,709.3 997.8 192.9 13,514.2 12,298.2 757.4 373.8 12,681.8 Below investment grade: Public 1,839.0 46.6 296.3 1,589.3 1,834.4 21.3 365.1 1,490.6 Private 1,870.6 69.5 250.5 1,689.6 1,861.4 139.1 296.4 1,704.1 Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale $ 45,252.0 $ 3,773.4 $ 978.5 $ 48,046.9 $ 44,491.9 $ 2,907.6 $ 1,470.3 $ 45,929.2 The following tables present the carrying amount and the gross unrealized losses, including other-than-temporary impairment losses reported in OCI, on investment grade fixed maturities available-for-sale by aging category as of the periods indicated. September 30, 2012 Public Private Total Gross Gross Gross Carrying unrealized Carrying unrealized Carrying unrealized amount losses amount losses amount losses (in millions) Three months or less $ 475.2 $ 3.4 $ 105.0 $ 1.2 $ 580.2 $ 4.6 Greater than three to six months 35.5 0.4 72.7 1.3 108.2 1.7 Greater than six to nine months 55.3 1.5 29.9 0.3 85.2 1.8 Greater than nine to twelve months 73.2 1.3 20.1 0.4 93.3 1.7 Greater than twelve to twenty-four months 468.2 27.2 397.8 15.4 866.0 42.6 Greater than twenty-four to thirty-six months 58.9 11.7 14.6 0.8 73.5 12.5 Greater than thirty-six months 834.8 193.3 806.0 173.5 1,640.8 366.8 Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale $ 2,001.1 $ 238.8 $ 1,446.1 $ 192.9 $ 3,447.2 $ 431.7 December 31, 2011 Public Private Total Gross Gross Gross Carrying unrealized Carrying unrealized Carrying unrealized amount losses amount losses amount losses (in millions) Three months or less $ 897.5 $ 14.1 $ 472.0 $ 4.9 $ 1,369.5 $ 19.0 Greater than three to six months 1,022.9 33.7 747.1 24.0 1,770.0 57.7 Greater than six to nine months 420.3 40.7 337.4 20.2 757.7 60.9 Greater than nine to twelve months 61.8 5.5 65.2 3.4 127.0 8.9 Greater than twelve to twenty-four months 135.0 15.8 184.5 20.5 319.5 36.3 Greater than twenty-four to thirty-six months 65.7 16.3 30.0 5.5 95.7 21.8 Greater than thirty-six months 1,122.5 308.9 1,138.0 295.3 2,260.5 604.2 Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale $ 3,725.7 $ 435.0 $ 2,974.2 $ 373.8 $ 6,699.9 $ 808.8 The following tables present the carrying amount and the gross unrealized losses, including other-than-temporary impairment losses reported in OCI, on below investment grade fixed maturities available-for-sale by aging category as of the periods indicated. 125
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents September 30, 2012 Public Private Total Gross Gross Gross Carrying unrealized Carrying unrealized Carrying unrealized amount losses amount losses amount losses (in millions) Three months or less $ 34.1 $ 0.1 $ 107.4 $ 2.8 $ 141.5 $ 2.9 Greater than three to six months 13.2 0.6 39.0 1.4 52.2 2.0 Greater than six to nine months - - 28.0 1.9 28.0 1.9 Greater than nine to twelve months 0.3 0.1 16.3 1.2 16.6 1.3 Greater than twelve to twenty-four months 73.9 6.7 56.7 9.9 130.6 16.6 Greater than twenty-four to thirty-six months 3.7 0.2 17.0 1.6 20.7 1.8 Greater than thirty-six months 676.7 288.6 450.8 231.7 1,127.5 520.3 Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale $ 801.9 $ 296.3 $ 715.2 $ 250.5 $ 1,517.1 $ 546.8 December 31, 2011 Public Private Total Gross Gross Gross Carrying unrealized Carrying unrealized Carrying unrealized amount losses amount losses amount losses (in millions)
Three months or less
$ 195.7 $ 9.9 Greater than three to six months 71.3 8.1 165.4 12.4 236.7 20.5 Greater than six to nine months 74.3 11.5 30.8 1.9 105.1 13.4 Greater than nine to twelve months 16.9 9.5 29.5 1.6 46.4 11.1 Greater than twelve to twenty-four months 42.2 11.8 18.9 4.4 61.1 16.2 Greater than twenty-four to thirty-six months 17.9 3.6 1.3 0.3 19.2 3.9 Greater than thirty-six months 693.0 317.0 483.5 269.5 1,176.5 586.5 Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale $ 1,039.0 $ 365.1 $ 801.7 $ 296.4 $ 1,840.7 $ 661.5 The following tables present the carrying amount and the gross unrealized losses, including other-than-temporary impairment losses reported in OCI, on fixed maturities available-for-sale where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by 20% or more as of the periods indicated. September 30, 2012 Problem, potential problem, All other fixed maturity and restructured securities Total Gross Gross Gross Carrying unrealized Carrying unrealized Carrying unrealized amount losses amount losses amount losses (in millions) Three months or less $ - $ - $ 3.6 $ 1.1 $ 3.6 $ 1.1 Greater than three to six months 5.0 1.4 51.8 14.0 56.8 15.4 Greater than six to nine months 4.5 3.2 18.5 6.2 23.0 9.4 Greater than nine to twelve months - - 28.7 13.0 28.7 13.0 Greater than twelve months 210.9 297.3 551.2 454.1 762.1 751.4
Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale $ 220.4 $ 301.9 $ 653.8 $ 488.4 $ 874.2 $ 790.3
December 31, 2011 Problem, potential problem, All other fixed maturity and restructured securities Total Gross Gross Gross Carrying unrealized Carrying unrealized Carrying unrealized amount losses amount losses amount losses (in millions) Three months or less $ 42.4 $ 14.0 $ 231.7 $ 75.5 $ 274.1 $ 89.5 Greater than three to six months 74.4 32.2 587.3 263.9 661.7 296.1 Greater than six to nine months 18.2 11.6 77.6 47.2 95.8 58.8 Greater than nine to twelve months 3.5 1.6 6.9 8.5 10.4 10.1 Greater than twelve months 171.9 262.4 452.8 387.6 624.7 650.0
Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale $ 310.4 $ 321.8 $ 1,356.3
126--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents Mortgage Loans Mortgage loans consist of commercial mortgage loans on real estate and residential mortgage loans. The carrying amount of our commercial mortgage loan portfolio was$9,922.4 million and$9,386.0 million as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , respectively. The carrying amount of our residential mortgage loan portfolio was$690.2 million and$746.0 million as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , respectively. Commercial Mortgage Loans. We generally report commercial mortgage loans on real estate at cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accrual of discounts, computed using the interest method and net of valuation allowances. Commercial mortgage loans play an important role in our investment strategy by: † providing strong risk-adjusted relative value in comparison to
other investment alternatives;
† enhancing total returns and † providing strategic portfolio diversification. As a result, we have focused on constructing a solid, high quality portfolio of mortgages. Our portfolio is generally comprised of mortgages originated with conservative loan-to-value ratios, high debt service coverages and general purpose property types with a strong credit tenancy. Our commercial mortgage loan portfolio consists primarily of non-recourse, fixed rate mortgages on fully or near fully leased properties. The mortgage portfolio is comprised primarily of credit oriented retail properties, office properties and general-purpose industrial properties. Our commercial mortgage loan portfolio is diversified by geography and specific collateral property type. Commercial mortgage lending in the state ofCalifornia accounted for 19% and 22% of our commercial mortgage loan portfolio as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , respectively. We are, therefore, exposed to potential losses resulting from the risk of catastrophes, such as earthquakes, that may affect the region. Like other lenders, we generally do not require earthquake insurance for properties on which we make commercial mortgage loans. With respect toCalifornia properties, however, we obtain an engineering report specific to each property. The report assesses the building's design specifications, whether it has been upgraded to meet seismic building codes and the maximum loss that is likely to result from a variety of different seismic events. We also obtain a report that assesses, by building and geographic fault lines, the amount of loss our commercial mortgage loan portfolio might suffer under a variety of seismic events. The typical borrower in our commercial loan portfolio is a single purpose entity or single asset entity. As ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , the total number of commercial mortgage loans outstanding was 963 and 975, of which 69% and 71% were for loans with principal balances less than$10 million , respectively. The average loan size of our commercial mortgage portfolio was$10.3 million and$9.7 million as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , respectively. Commercial Mortgage Loan Credit Monitoring. For further details on monitoring and management of our commercial mortgage loan portfolio, see Item 1. "Financial Statements, Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 3, Investments - Mortgage Loan Credit Monitoring." We categorize loans that are 60 days or more delinquent, loans in process of foreclosure and loans with borrowers or credit tenants in bankruptcy that are delinquent as "problem" loans. Valuation allowances or charge-offs have been recognized on most problem loans. We categorize loans that are delinquent less than 60 days where the default is expected to be cured and loans with borrowers or credit tenants in bankruptcy that are current as "potential problem" loans. The decision whether to classify a loan delinquent less than 60 days as a potential problem involves significant subjective judgments by management as to the likely future economic conditions and developments with respect to the borrower. We categorize loans for which the original note rate has been reduced below market and loans for which the principal has been reduced as "restructured" loans. We also consider loans that are refinanced more than one year beyond the original maturity or call date at below market rates as restructured. There has been a decrease in the total level of problem, potential problem and restructured commercial mortgages during 2012 primarily due to loan payoffs, foreclosures, and improvement in collateral occupancies and values. The South Atlantic region accounted for over 70% of the problem, potential problem and restructured commercial mortgages as ofSeptember 30, 2012 . The South Atlantic, Pacific, and East North Central regions accounted for over 90% of the problem, potential problem, and restructured commercial mortgages as ofDecember 31, 2011 . Office properties accounted for over half of the problem, potential problem and restructured commercial mortgages as ofSeptember 30, 2012 . Office and apartment properties accounted for over half of the problem, potential problem and restructured commercial mortgages as ofDecember 31, 2011 . 127 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table presents the carrying amounts of problem, potential problem and restructured commercial mortgages relative to the carrying amount of all commercial mortgages for the periods indicated. September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 ($ in millions) Total commercial mortgages $ 9,922.4 $ 9,386.0 Problem commercial mortgages $ 17.5 $ 112.7 Potential problem commercial mortgages 149.7 152.8 Restructured problem commercial mortgages - 7.5 Total problem, potential problem and restructured commercial mortgages $ 167.2 $ 273.0 Total problem, potential problem and restructured commercial mortgages as a percent of total commercial mortgages 1.69 % 2.91 % Commercial Mortgage Loan Valuation Allowance. The valuation allowance for commercial mortgage loans includes loan specific reserves for loans that are deemed to be impaired as well as reserves for pools of loans with similar characteristics where a property risk or market specific risk has not been identified but for which we anticipate a loss may occur. For further details on the commercial mortgage valuation allowance, see Item 1. "Financial Statements, Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 3, Investments - Mortgage Loan Valuation Allowance." The valuation allowance decreased$12.4 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 , and decreased$15.8 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2011 . The decrease in the level of valuation allowance during 2012 and 2011 was related to the same market factors as those causing the decrease in the level of problem, potential problem and restructured commercial mortgages during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 . The South Atlantic region accounts for the highest level of reserves at bothSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 . The following table represents our commercial mortgage valuation allowance for the periods indicated. September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 ($ in millions) Balance, beginning of period $ 64.8 $ 80.6 Provision 14.3 17.0 Charge-offs (26.7 ) (32.9 ) Recoveries - 0.1 Balance, end of period $ 52.4 $ 64.8 Valuation allowance as % of carrying value before reserves 0.53 % 0.69 % Residential Mortgage Loans. The residential mortgage loan portfolio is composed of home equity mortgages with an amortized cost of$519.5 million and$611.0 million and first lien mortgages with an amortized cost of$212.9 million and$171.0 million as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , respectively, primarily held by our Bank andTrust Services business. The home equity loans are generally second lien mortgages made up of closed-end loans and lines of credit. Non-performing residential mortgage loans, which are defined as loans 90 days or greater delinquent plus non-accrual loans, totaled$35.0 million and$24.0 million as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , respectively. We establish the residential mortgage loan valuation allowance at levels considered adequate to absorb probable losses within the portfolio based on management's evaluation of the size and current risk characteristics of the portfolio. Such evaluation considers numerous factors, including, but not limited to net charge-off trends, loss forecasts, collateral values, geographic location, borrower credit scores, delinquency rates, industry condition and economic trends. During the third quarter of 2012, we increased our provision and charge-offs primarily due to implementation of guidance provided by theOffice of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") Bank Accounting Advisory Series, which provided additional clarification on accounting for loans discharged in bankruptcy and measurement of impairment on certain restructured loans. As ofSeptember 30, 2012 , only 4% of loans that were charged off under the OCC guidance were 30 days or more past due. Implementation of this guidance also increased our nonaccrual loans. The changes in the valuation allowance are reported in net realized capital gains (losses) on our consolidated statements of operations. Our residential mortgage loan portfolio, and in particular our home equity loan portfolio, experienced an increase in loss severity from sustained elevated levels of unemployment along with continued depressed collateral values beginning in 2010. While these factors continue to drive charge-offs, loss rates overall have stabilized and the portfolio balance continues to decline. The following table represents our residential mortgage valuation allowance for the periods indicated. 128
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 ($ in millions) Balance, beginning of period $ 36.0 $ 37.7 Provision 32.5 28.5 Charge-offs (28.9 ) (33.4 ) Recoveries 2.6 3.2 Balance, end of period $ 42.2 $ 36.0 Valuation allowance as % of carrying value before reserves 5.8 % 4.6 % Real Estate Real estate consists primarily of commercial equity real estate. As ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , the carrying amount of our equity real estate investment was$1,200.0 million , or 2%, and$1,083.9 million , or 2%, of U.S. invested assets, respectively. Our commercial equity real estate is held in the form of wholly owned real estate, real estate acquired upon foreclosure of commercial mortgage loans and majority owned interests in real estate joint ventures. Equity real estate is categorized as either "real estate held for investment" or "real estate held for sale." Real estate held for investment totaled$1,139.5 million and$1,047.3 million as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , respectively. The carrying value of real estate held for investment is generally adjusted for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Such impairment adjustments are recorded as net realized losses and, accordingly, are reflected in our consolidated results of operations. For the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and year endedDecember 31, 2011 , there were no such impairment adjustments. The carrying amount of real estate held for sale was$60.5 million and$36.6 million as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , respectively. There were no valuation allowances as ofSeptember 30, 2012 orDecember 31, 2011 . Once we identify a real estate property to be sold and commence a plan for marketing the property, we classify the property as held for sale. We establish a valuation allowance subject to periodic revisions, if necessary, to adjust the carrying value of the property to reflect the lower of its current carrying value or the fair value, less associated selling costs. We use research, both internal and external, to recommend appropriate product and geographic allocations and changes to the equity real estate portfolio. We monitor product, geographic and industry diversification separately and together to determine the most appropriate mix. Equity real estate is distributed across geographic regions of the country with larger concentrations in the South Atlantic, West South Central, and Pacific regions ofthe United States as ofSeptember 30, 2012 . By property type, there is a concentration in office, industrial, and retail that represented approximately 77% of the equity real estate portfolio as ofSeptember 30, 2012 . Other Investments Our other investments totaled$1,781.2 million as ofSeptember 30, 2012 , compared to$1,783.5 million as ofDecember 31, 2011 . Derivative assets accounted for$1,094.9 million and$1,156.5 million in other investments as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , respectively. The remaining invested assets include equity method investments, which include real estate properties owned jointly with venture partners and operated by the partners.
International Investment Operations
Of our invested assets,$ 5,922.6 million were held by ourPrincipal International segment as ofSeptember 30, 2012 . The assets are managed by either ourPrincipal Global Investors segment or by the localPrincipal International affiliate. Due to the regulatory constraints in each country, each company maintains its own investment policies. As shown in the following table, the major categories of international invested assets as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , were fixed maturities, other investments, residential mortgage loans and equity securities. In addition, policy loans are included in our invested assets. The following table excludes invested assets of the separate accounts. 129
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of ContentsSeptember 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 Carrying amount % of total
Carrying amount % of total
($ in millions) Fixed maturities - Public $ 3,689.8 62 % $ 3,269.1 63 % Equity securities 121.4 2 86.0 2 Mortgage loans: Commercial 13.3 - 10.6 - Residential 672.0 12 584.6 11 Real estate held for sale 7.7 - 8.2 - Real estate held for investment 0.9 - 0.8 - Policy loans 26.6 1 23.5 1 Other investments 1,390.9 23 1,202.3 23 Total invested assets 5,922.6 100 % 5,185.1 100 % Cash and cash equivalents 121.8 92.2 Total invested assets and cash $ 6,044.4 $ 5,277.3 Investments in equity method subsidiaries and direct financing leases accounted for$691.9 million and$623.4 million , respectively, of other investments as ofSeptember 30, 2012 , and$667.5 million and$507.5 million , respectively, of other investments as ofDecember 31, 2011 . The remaining other investments as of bothSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , are primarily related to derivative assets and other short-term investments. Fixed Maturities Exposure Economic and fiscal conditions in select European countries, includingGreece ,Ireland ,Italy ,Portugal andSpain , continue to cause credit concerns particularly to financial institutions and banks with exposure to the European periphery region. Our exposure to the region within our International investment operations fixed maturities portfolio is manageable, representing 6.5% and 7.7% of our total International invested assets as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 , respectively. Portfolio holdings with exposure to this region consist of fixed maturities issued in the same countries as our International operations by local subsidiaries of the European parent. Nearly all of the exposure is to bonds issued inChile . In addition, we did not hold any sovereign debt issuances of the selected countries and had not bought or sold credit protection on sovereign issuances as ofSeptember 30, 2012 andDecember 31, 2011 . Financial sector exposure is to local subsidiary banks, subject to local capital requirements and banking regulation. The current financial exposure carries an average AA local rating from S&P and the average time to maturity is 18 years. Non-financial sector exposure consists primarily of infrastructure bonds, which are backed by the project itself, often with minimum revenue guarantees from the government. The current non-financial exposure carries an average AA local rating from S&P. The current Italian exposure has an average time to maturity of 12 years. In addition, the current Spanish exposure has an average time to maturity of 14 years. As ofSeptember 30, 2012 , our total portfolio exposure had an average price of 107 (carrying value/amortized cost).
<p>The following table presents the carrying amount of our European periphery zone fixed maturities exposure for the periods indicated.
September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 Select European Exposure Italy Spain Total Italy Spain Total (in millions) Non-Sovereign: Financial institutions $ - $ 255.4 $ 255.4 $ - $ 241.5 $ 241.5 Non-financial institutions 11.5 127.1 138.6 52.5 112.4 164.9 Total $ 11.5 $ 382.5 $ 394.0 $ 52.5 $ 353.9 $ 406.4
For further details on our U.S. investment operations exposure to these European countries, see "U.S. Investment Operations - Fixed Maturities."
130 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
| Wordcount: | 24898 |



Gubernatorial candidates debate health care at Portsmouth forum [Foster’s Daily Democrat, Dover, N.H.]
Advisor News
- SEC in ‘active and detailed’ settlement talks with accused scammer Tai Lopez
- Sketching out the golden years: new book tries to make retirement planning fun
- Most women say they are their household’s CFO, Allianz Life survey finds
- MassMutual reports strong 2025 results
- The silent retirement savings killer: Bridging the Medicare gap
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Advising clients wanting to retire early: how annuities can bridge the gap
- F&G joins Voya’s annuity platform
- Regulators ponder how to tamp down annuity illustrations as high as 27%
- Annual annuity reviews: leverage them to keep clients engaged
- Symetra Enhances Fixed Indexed Annuities, Introduces New Franklin Large Cap Value 15% ER Index
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- IF FINALIZED, PROPOSED CHANGES TO MEDICARE ADVANTAGE AND MEDICARE PART D WOULD IMPACT SENIORS' COVERAGE AND CARE IN 2027
- ASSEMBLYMEMBER WILSON INTRODUCES LEGISLATION TO PROTECT CALIFORNIANS FROM GENETIC AND BIOMARKER DISCRIMINATION IN INSURANCE
- SENATORS HASSAN, COLLINS INTRODUCE BIPARTISAN BILL TO HELP PEOPLE DIAGNOSED WITH TERMINAL ILLNESS OR SERIOUS DISABILITY ACCESS THEIR EARNED BENEFITS FASTER
- Study Results from Johns Hopkins University Broaden Understanding of Managed Care (Medicare Advantage Networks for Surgical Specialists): Managed Care
- How Personal Injury Claims Affect Future Health Insurance Coverage in Charlotte, NC
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Majority of Women Now Are the Chief Financial Officer of Their Household, Allianz Life Study Finds
- Most women say they are their household’s CFO, Allianz Life survey finds
- MassMutual Delivers Excellent 2025 Financial Results
- ACORE CAPITAL Named Alternative Lender of the Year ($15 Billion + AUM) by PERE Credit
- Baby on Board
More Life Insurance News