Identity Theft Red Flags (Regulation V)
| Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
Final rule.
CFR Part: "12 CFR Part 222"
RIN Number: "RIN 7100 AE14"
Citation: "79 FR 30709"
Document Number: "Docket No. R-1484"
"Rules and Regulations"
SUMMARY:
EFFECTIVE DATE: The final rule is effective
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On
FOOTNOTE 1 The other banking agencies included the
FOOTNOTE 2 72 FR 63718 (
The Red Flags rule, implemented in the Board's Regulation V, Subpart J, defines the terms "credit" and "creditor" by cross-reference to FCRA section 603(r)(5). 15 U.S.C. 1681a(r)(5). Section 603(r)(5) defines the terms "credit" and "creditor" by cross-reference to section 702 of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA). ECOA section 702 defines "creditor" as "any person who regularly extends, renews, or continues credit; any person who regularly arranges for the extension, renewal, or continuation of credit; or any assignee of an original creditor who participates in the decision to extend, renew, or continue credit." 15 U.S.C. 1691a(e). The ECOA defines "credit" as "the right granted by a creditor to a debtor to defer payment of debt or to incur debts and defer its payment or to purchase property or services and defer payment therefor." 15 U.S.C. 1691a(d). Thus, the FCRA's red flags provisions have been broadly applied to banks, finance companies, automobile dealers, mortgage brokers, utility companies, and telecommunications companies. 12 CFR 222.90(b)(5).
The scope of the Board's Red Flags rule is set forth in 12 CFR 222.90(a), which states that the Board's rule applies to financial institutions and creditors that are state member banks (other than national banks) and their respective operating subsidiaries, branches and agencies of foreign banks (other than federal branches, federal agencies, and insured state branches of foreign banks), commercial lending companies owned or controlled by foreign banks, and organizations operating under section 25 or 25A of the Federal Reserve Act. Financial institutions and creditors that are not covered by the Board's rule are covered by substantially identical rules issued by other federal agencies.
II. The Red Flag Program Clarification Act of 2010
On
FOOTNOTE 3 Public Law 111-319, 124 Stat. 3457 (
The Clarification Act's revised definition excludes, however, those creditors that advance funds on behalf of a person for expenses incidental to a service provided by the creditor to that person. 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4)(B). The legislative intent of narrowing the definition of "creditor" in the Red Flags rule was to exclude from coverage those persons that sell a product or service for which the consumer can pay later, such as lawyers and doctors. /4/
FOOTNOTE 4 156 Cong. Rec. S8289 (daily ed.
The Clarification Act also grants authority to the Board and the other agencies to determine, through a rulemaking, whether there are other creditors that offer or maintain accounts that are subject to a reasonably foreseeable risk of identity theft that should be subject to the Red Flags rule. 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4)(C). The Board is not using its discretionary rulemaking authority at this time to extend the application of its Red Flags rule to additional creditors.
III. The Board's Proposed Revisions to Regulation V
In
FOOTNOTE 5 79 FR 9645 (
IV. The Final Rule
As discussed above, the Board proposed to amend the definition of "creditor" in
Under the Clarification Act and the final rule, creditors that do not regularly and in the ordinary course of business: (a) Obtain or use consumer reports in connection with a credit transaction; (b) furnish information to consumer reporting agencies in connection with a credit transaction; or (c) advance funds to or on behalf of a person, are no longer subject to the identity theft red flags requirements. However, the Red Flags rule still covers all financial institutions, regardless of whether they meet the revised definition of creditor. /6/ As a result, the revised definition does not affect the scope of the Board's rules, which only apply to state member banks and other financial institutions.
FOOTNOTE 6 The Board consulted and coordinated with the other banking agencies, the FTC, the NCUA, the CFTC, and the
Commenters also supported the proposal to revise Supplement A to Appendix J of Regulation V, which included a cross-reference to the Board's definition of a "notice of address discrepancy" in Regulation V (12 CFR 222.82(b)). Because the Board's rulemaking authority for the notice of address discrepancy provisions of the FCRA (15 U.S.C. 1681c(h)) transferred to the
FOOTNOTE 7 The Board notes that there is no substantive difference between the Board's definition of a "notice of address discrepancy" and the
One commenter suggested that the Board make further amendments to Regulation V to repeal provisions for which the rulemaking authority was not retained by the Board after the transfer of authority to the
V. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
1. Statement of the need for, and objectives of, the final rule. As noted above, the Clarification Act amended the definition of "creditor" in the FCRA for purposes of the red flags provisions. The Board is amending the definition of "creditor" in its Red Flags rule to reflect the revised definition of that term in the Clarification Act. As also noted above, the Board is updating a cross-reference in the Red Flags rule to reflect the
2. Summary of issues raised by comments in response to the initial regulatory flexibility analysis. The Board did not receive any comments on the initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
3. Small entities affected by the final rule. The final rule amends the definition of "creditor" in the Board's Regulation V to conform to the revised definition of that term in the Clarification Act. The definition continues to refer to the FCRA definition of "creditor," which references the ECOA definition of "creditor," but limits the application of the red flags provisions to only those creditors that regularly and in the ordinary course of business: (a) Obtain or use consumer reports in connection with a credit transaction; (b) furnish information to consumer reporting agencies in connection with a credit transaction; or (c) advance funds to or on behalf of a person, based on an obligation of the person to repay the funds or repayable from specific property pledged by or on behalf of the person. 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4)(A). However, small entities that are financial institutions are still subject to the requirements, regardless of whether they meet the revised definition of creditor. Consequently, the revisions do not affect the scope of the Board's rules, which only apply to state member banks and other financial institutions, so no small entities are affected.
The final rule also updates a cross-reference in the Red Flags rule to reflect the
4. Recordkeeping, reporting, and compliance requirements. The final rule does not impose any new recordkeeping, reporting, or compliance requirements on small entities. Small entities that no longer meet the narrower definition of "creditor" would not have to comply with the requirements of the Red Flags rule. However, small entity financial institutions would still be required to comply with the Red Flags rule, regardless of whether they meet the revised definition of creditor. Thus, the revisions do not affect the scope of the Board's rules, which only apply to state member banks and other financial institutions. In addition, the updated cross-reference in the final rule that reflects the
5. Significant alternatives to the final revisions. Because the amendments in the final rule will have no impact, there are no significant alternatives that would further minimize the economic impact of the final rule on small entities.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506; 5 CFR Part 1320, Appendix A.1), the Board reviewed the rule under the authority delegated to the Federal Reserve by the
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 222
Banks, banking, Consumer protection, Safety and soundness, and State member banks.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board amends Regulation V, 12 CFR part 222, as set forth below:
PART 222--FAIR CREDIT REPORTING (REGULATION V)
1. The authority citation for part 222 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1681b, 1681c, 1681m and 1681s; Secs. 3, 214, and 216, Pub. L. 108-159, 117 Stat. 1952.
2. Amend
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) Creditor has the same meaning as in 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4).
* * * * *
3. Amend Supplement A to Appendix J by revising example 3. to read as follows:
Appendix J to Part 222--Interagency Guidelines on Identity Theft Detection, Prevention, and Mitigation
* * * * *
Supplement A to Appendix J
* * * * *
3. A consumer reporting agency provides a notice of address discrepancy, as defined in 12 CFR 1022.82(b).
* * * * *
By order of the
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-12358 Filed 5-28-14;
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
| Copyright: | (c) 2014 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
| Wordcount: | 2524 |



Notice of Public Meeting and Webinar: Revisions to the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 4) for Public Water Systems
Advisor News
- Industry groups applaud House passage of Financial Exploitation Prevention Act
- Younger workers more likely to be eligible for a retirement plan after changing jobs
- Bank of America community event unpacks sales tax hike, small business struggles
- CONGRESSMAN VALADAO DEMANDS ANSWERS FROM CALIFORNIA OVER HEALTHCARE TAX HIKE
- How executive benefits impact an estate plan
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- State Farm’s agency overhaul: What distribution can learn
- IRI, ACLI express support for CLEAR Forms Act
- A new era at the Federal Reserve
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Making Surprising Moves in Tuesday Session
- Why annuities are gaining traction with younger investors
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Maryland health insurers want to raise premiums an average 13.7% for individual plans in 2027
- Maryland health insurance rates could rise 13.7% in 2027 under proposal
- Millions drop Obamacare health coverage after subsidies expire and costs rise
- Improving how we deliver healthcare in Idaho
- Healthcare system needs a public option
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Misr Insurance Company
- State Farm’s agency overhaul: What distribution can learn
- They Allegedly Enrolled People In Life Insurance Without Consent. Then Death Claims Paid Out
- How much do state residents need to retire comfortably?
- How executive benefits impact an estate plan
More Life Insurance News