Identity Theft Red Flags (Regulation V) - Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Advisor News
    • Annuity Index
    • Annuity News
    • Companies
    • Earnings
    • Fiduciary
    • From the Field: Expert Insights
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Insurance & Financial Fraud
    • INN Magazine
    • Insiders Only
    • Life Insurance News
    • Newswires
    • Property and Casualty
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Articles
    • Washington Wire
    • Videos
    • ———
    • About
    • Meet our Editorial Staff
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Newsletters
  • Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Exclusives
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Video
  • Washington Wire
  • Life Insurance
  • Annuities
  • Advisor
  • Health/Benefits
  • Property & Casualty
  • Insurtech
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
Newswires
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
May 29, 2014 Newswires
Share
Share
Post
Email

Identity Theft Red Flags (Regulation V)

Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc.

Final rule.

CFR Part: "12 CFR Part 222"

RIN Number: "RIN 7100 AE14"

Citation: "79 FR 30709"

Document Number: "Docket No. R-1484"

Page Number: "30709"

"Rules and Regulations"

SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is amending its rule on identity theft "red flags" ("Red Flags rule"), which implements section 615(e) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The Red Flag Program Clarification Act of 2010 (the Clarification Act) added a definition of "creditor" in FCRA section 615(e) that is specific to section 615(e). Accordingly, the final rule amends the definition of "creditor" in the Red Flags rule to reflect the definition of that term as added by the Clarification Act. The final rule also updates a cross-reference in the Red Flags rule to reflect a statutory change in rulemaking authority.

   EFFECTIVE DATE: The final rule is effective June 30, 2014.

   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mandie K. Aubrey, Counsel, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, at (202) 452-3667, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th and C Streets NW., Washington, DC 20551. For users of Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) only, contact (202) 263-4869.

   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

   On November 9, 2007, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), along with the other banking agencies, /1/ National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (collectively, the "Agencies"), published final rules and guidelines on identity theft "red flags" ("Red Flags rule") to implement section 615(e) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) (15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)). /2/ The Red Flags rule requires each financial institution and creditor that holds any consumer account, or other account for which there is a reasonably foreseeable risk of identity theft, to develop and implement an identity theft prevention program in connection with new and existing accounts. The program must include reasonable policies and procedures for detecting, preventing, and mitigating identity theft. The Agencies also issued guidelines to assist financial institutions and creditors in developing and implementing a program, including a supplement that provides examples of red flags.

   FOOTNOTE 1 The other banking agencies included the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; and Office of Thrift Supervision. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) added the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to the list of agencies with rulemaking and enforcement authority under the Fair Credit Reporting Act with respect to the Red Flags rule. Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010). END FOOTNOTE

   FOOTNOTE 2 72 FR 63718 (Nov. 9, 2007). END FOOTNOTE

   The Red Flags rule, implemented in the Board's Regulation V, Subpart J, defines the terms "credit" and "creditor" by cross-reference to FCRA section 603(r)(5). 15 U.S.C. 1681a(r)(5). Section 603(r)(5) defines the terms "credit" and "creditor" by cross-reference to section 702 of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA). ECOA section 702 defines "creditor" as "any person who regularly extends, renews, or continues credit; any person who regularly arranges for the extension, renewal, or continuation of credit; or any assignee of an original creditor who participates in the decision to extend, renew, or continue credit." 15 U.S.C. 1691a(e). The ECOA defines "credit" as "the right granted by a creditor to a debtor to defer payment of debt or to incur debts and defer its payment or to purchase property or services and defer payment therefor." 15 U.S.C. 1691a(d). Thus, the FCRA's red flags provisions have been broadly applied to banks, finance companies, automobile dealers, mortgage brokers, utility companies, and telecommunications companies. 12 CFR 222.90(b)(5).

   The scope of the Board's Red Flags rule is set forth in 12 CFR 222.90(a), which states that the Board's rule applies to financial institutions and creditors that are state member banks (other than national banks) and their respective operating subsidiaries, branches and agencies of foreign banks (other than federal branches, federal agencies, and insured state branches of foreign banks), commercial lending companies owned or controlled by foreign banks, and organizations operating under section 25 or 25A of the Federal Reserve Act. Financial institutions and creditors that are not covered by the Board's rule are covered by substantially identical rules issued by other federal agencies.

II. The Red Flag Program Clarification Act of 2010

   On December 18, 2010, Congress enacted the Red Flag Program Clarification Act of 2010 (the Clarification Act). /3/ The Clarification Act amended section 615(e) of the FCRA (15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)) by adding a definition of the term "creditor" that is specific to section 615(e). The Clarification Act continues to define creditor by cross-reference to the ECOA's definition of creditor, but limits the application of the red flags provisions of the FCRA to only those creditors that regularly and in the ordinary course of business: (a) Obtain or use consumer reports, directly or indirectly, in connection with a credit transaction; (b) furnish information to consumer reporting agencies, as described in FCRA section 623, in connection with a credit transaction; or (c) advance funds to or on behalf of a person, based on an obligation of the person to repay the funds or repayable from specific property pledged by or on behalf of the person. 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4)(A).

   FOOTNOTE 3 Public Law 111-319, 124 Stat. 3457 (Dec. 18, 2010). END FOOTNOTE

   The Clarification Act's revised definition excludes, however, those creditors that advance funds on behalf of a person for expenses incidental to a service provided by the creditor to that person. 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4)(B). The legislative intent of narrowing the definition of "creditor" in the Red Flags rule was to exclude from coverage those persons that sell a product or service for which the consumer can pay later, such as lawyers and doctors. /4/

   FOOTNOTE 4 156 Cong. Rec. S8289 (daily ed. Nov. 30, 2010) (statement of Sen. Dodd). END FOOTNOTE

   The Clarification Act also grants authority to the Board and the other agencies to determine, through a rulemaking, whether there are other creditors that offer or maintain accounts that are subject to a reasonably foreseeable risk of identity theft that should be subject to the Red Flags rule. 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4)(C). The Board is not using its discretionary rulemaking authority at this time to extend the application of its Red Flags rule to additional creditors.

III. The Board's Proposed Revisions to Regulation V

   In February 2014, the Board proposed to amend the definition of "creditor" in Regulation V (12 CFR 222.90) to conform the rule to the definition of "creditor" in the FCRA as amended by the Clarification Act (Proposed Rule). /5/ The Board also proposed to update a citation in Supplement A to Appendix J of Regulation V in light of the transfer of rulemaking authority to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The Board received five comments on the Proposed Rule.

   FOOTNOTE 5 79 FR 9645 (Feb. 20, 2014). END FOOTNOTE

IV. The Final Rule

   As discussed above, the Board proposed to amend the definition of "creditor" in SEC 222.90(b)(5) to cross-reference the limited definition of creditor in section 615(e) of the FCRA, which is specific to the statute's red flags provisions. Accordingly, proposed SEC 222.90(b)(5) provided that "creditor has the same meaning as in 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4)." Commenters unanimously supported the Board's proposal to amend the definition, and the Board is adopting the proposed changes in the final rule.

   Under the Clarification Act and the final rule, creditors that do not regularly and in the ordinary course of business: (a) Obtain or use consumer reports in connection with a credit transaction; (b) furnish information to consumer reporting agencies in connection with a credit transaction; or (c) advance funds to or on behalf of a person, are no longer subject to the identity theft red flags requirements. However, the Red Flags rule still covers all financial institutions, regardless of whether they meet the revised definition of creditor. /6/ As a result, the revised definition does not affect the scope of the Board's rules, which only apply to state member banks and other financial institutions.

   FOOTNOTE 6 The Board consulted and coordinated with the other banking agencies, the FTC, the NCUA, the CFTC, and the SEC with respect to the final rule. The FTC issued an interim final rule and the OCC issued a final rule amending the definition of "creditor" in their respective Red Flags rules, consistent with the revised definition in the Clarification Act. 77 FR 72712 (Dec. 6, 2012) (FTC) and 79 FR 28393 (May 16, 2014) (OCC). The CFTC and SEC jointly issued final Red Flags rules and guidelines reflecting the FCRA definition of "creditor" as amended by the Clarification Act. 78 FR 23637 (Apr. 19, 2013). The Board understands that the FDIC and the NCUA will act separately with respect to any necessary updates to each agency's Red Flags rule. END FOOTNOTE

   Commenters also supported the proposal to revise Supplement A to Appendix J of Regulation V, which included a cross-reference to the Board's definition of a "notice of address discrepancy" in Regulation V (12 CFR 222.82(b)). Because the Board's rulemaking authority for the notice of address discrepancy provisions of the FCRA (15 U.S.C. 1681c(h)) transferred to the CFPB under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Board proposed to revise the citation in Appendix J so that it cross-references the CFPB's definition of a "notice of address discrepancy" in the CFPB's Regulation V (12 CFR 1022.82(b)). /7/ The Board is updating the citation as proposed.

   FOOTNOTE 7 The Board notes that there is no substantive difference between the Board's definition of a "notice of address discrepancy" and the CFPB's definition. END FOOTNOTE

   One commenter suggested that the Board make further amendments to Regulation V to repeal provisions for which the rulemaking authority was not retained by the Board after the transfer of authority to the CFPB under the Dodd-Frank Act. The Board intends to make further revisions to Regulation V to reflect changes in its rulemaking authority at a later date.

V. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

   The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA) generally requires an agency to perform an assessment of the impact a rule is expected to have on small entities. Based on its analysis, and for the reasons stated below, the Board believes that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

   1. Statement of the need for, and objectives of, the final rule. As noted above, the Clarification Act amended the definition of "creditor" in the FCRA for purposes of the red flags provisions. The Board is amending the definition of "creditor" in its Red Flags rule to reflect the revised definition of that term in the Clarification Act. As also noted above, the Board is updating a cross-reference in the Red Flags rule to reflect the CFPB's rulemaking authority for the notice of address discrepancy provisions in the FCRA.

   2. Summary of issues raised by comments in response to the initial regulatory flexibility analysis. The Board did not receive any comments on the initial regulatory flexibility analysis.

   3. Small entities affected by the final rule. The final rule amends the definition of "creditor" in the Board's Regulation V to conform to the revised definition of that term in the Clarification Act. The definition continues to refer to the FCRA definition of "creditor," which references the ECOA definition of "creditor," but limits the application of the red flags provisions to only those creditors that regularly and in the ordinary course of business: (a) Obtain or use consumer reports in connection with a credit transaction; (b) furnish information to consumer reporting agencies in connection with a credit transaction; or (c) advance funds to or on behalf of a person, based on an obligation of the person to repay the funds or repayable from specific property pledged by or on behalf of the person. 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4)(A). However, small entities that are financial institutions are still subject to the requirements, regardless of whether they meet the revised definition of creditor. Consequently, the revisions do not affect the scope of the Board's rules, which only apply to state member banks and other financial institutions, so no small entities are affected.

   The final rule also updates a cross-reference in the Red Flags rule to reflect the CFPB's rulemaking authority for the notice of address discrepancy provisions in the FCRA. This revision has no effect on small entities because there is no substantive difference between the Board's definition of a "notice of address discrepancy" and the CFPB's definition.

   4. Recordkeeping, reporting, and compliance requirements. The final rule does not impose any new recordkeeping, reporting, or compliance requirements on small entities. Small entities that no longer meet the narrower definition of "creditor" would not have to comply with the requirements of the Red Flags rule. However, small entity financial institutions would still be required to comply with the Red Flags rule, regardless of whether they meet the revised definition of creditor. Thus, the revisions do not affect the scope of the Board's rules, which only apply to state member banks and other financial institutions. In addition, the updated cross-reference in the final rule that reflects the CFPB's rulemaking authority for the notice of address discrepancy provisions in the FCRA is not a substantive change.

   5. Significant alternatives to the final revisions. Because the amendments in the final rule will have no impact, there are no significant alternatives that would further minimize the economic impact of the final rule on small entities.

VI. Paperwork Reduction Act

   In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506; 5 CFR Part 1320, Appendix A.1), the Board reviewed the rule under the authority delegated to the Federal Reserve by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The final rule contains no requirements subject to the PRA.

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 222

   Banks, banking, Consumer protection, Safety and soundness, and State member banks.

Authority and Issuance

   For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board amends Regulation V, 12 CFR part 222, as set forth below:

PART 222--FAIR CREDIT REPORTING (REGULATION V)

   1. The authority citation for part 222 continues to read as follows:

   Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1681b, 1681c, 1681m and 1681s; Secs. 3, 214, and 216, Pub. L. 108-159, 117 Stat. 1952.

   2. Amend SEC 222.90 by revising paragraph (b)(5) to read as follows:

SEC 222.90 Duties regarding the detection, prevention, and mitigation of identity theft.

* * * * *

   (b) * * *

   (5) Creditor has the same meaning as in 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4).

* * * * *

   3. Amend Supplement A to Appendix J by revising example 3. to read as follows:

Appendix J to Part 222--Interagency Guidelines on Identity Theft Detection, Prevention, and Mitigation

* * * * *

   Supplement A to Appendix J

* * * * *

   3. A consumer reporting agency provides a notice of address discrepancy, as defined in 12 CFR 1022.82(b).

* * * * *

   By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 22, 2014.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-12358 Filed 5-28-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P

Copyright:  (c) 2014 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc.
Wordcount:  2524

Newer

Notice of Public Meeting and Webinar: Revisions to the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 4) for Public Water Systems

Advisor News

  • Industry groups applaud House passage of Financial Exploitation Prevention Act
  • Younger workers more likely to be eligible for a retirement plan after changing jobs
  • Bank of America community event unpacks sales tax hike, small business struggles
  • CONGRESSMAN VALADAO DEMANDS ANSWERS FROM CALIFORNIA OVER HEALTHCARE TAX HIKE
  • How executive benefits impact an estate plan
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • State Farm’s agency overhaul: What distribution can learn
  • IRI, ACLI express support for CLEAR Forms Act
  • A new era at the Federal Reserve
  • Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Making Surprising Moves in Tuesday Session
  • Why annuities are gaining traction with younger investors
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • Maryland health insurers want to raise premiums an average 13.7% for individual plans in 2027
  • Maryland health insurance rates could rise 13.7% in 2027 under proposal
  • Millions drop Obamacare health coverage after subsidies expire and costs rise
  • Improving how we deliver healthcare in Idaho
  • Healthcare system needs a public option
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance News

  • AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Misr Insurance Company
  • State Farm’s agency overhaul: What distribution can learn
  • They Allegedly Enrolled People In Life Insurance Without Consent. Then Death Claims Paid Out
  • How much do state residents need to retire comfortably?
  • How executive benefits impact an estate plan
More Life Insurance News

NEWS INSIDE

  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Economic News
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech News
  • Newswires Feed
  • Regulation News
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos

FEATURED OFFERS

Maximize Your FIA Case Results
Learn a repeatable process to review, reposition, and present FIA opportunities with confidence.

Aim higher during Annuity Awareness Month
Raise the bar with our diverse portfolio of Ascend annuities, backed by superior financial strength

You Could Be Losing Up to 20% of Your Commissions
GreenWave helps you find, fix, and prevent commission errors.

True Independence Means Having Choices
Cambridge offers flexibility, stability, proven tools—no private equity strings attached.

Life moves fast. Your BGA should, too.
Stay ahead with Modern Life's AI-powered tech and expert support.

Looking for stronger rates, amplified growth & real results?
Sentinel's Accumulation Protector Plus℠ Annuity is for clients wanting more from retirement planning

Press Releases

  • Prosperity Life GroupSM Launches Prosperity PathWaySM Series, Bringing Greater Choice and Flexibility to Retirement Income Planning
  • Senior Market Sales® Fortifies Annuity Reach With Acquisition of Retirement Planning Firm Stratton & Company
  • RFP #T01625
  • Rockwood Programs Appoints Kerry Ladouceur as Vice President, Financial Lines
  • JP Insurance Group Launches Commercial Property & Casualty Division; Appoints Joe Webster as Managing Director
More Press Releases > Add Your Press Release >

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

Topics

  • Advisor News
  • Annuity Index
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • From the Field: Expert Insights
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Magazine
  • Insiders Only
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos
  • ———
  • About
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Newsletters

Top Sections

  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine
  • Life Insurance News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • Washington Wire

Our Company

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Write for INN

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2026 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine

Sign in with your Insider Pro Account

Not registered? Become an Insider Pro.
Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet