Exception From Passive Income for Certain Foreign Insurance Companies
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations that provide guidance regarding when a foreign insurance company's income is excluded from the definition of passive income under section 1297(b)(2)(B). The proposed regulations affect the U.S. shareholders of foreign corporations. This document also invites comments from the public on all aspects of the proposed rules and provides the opportunity for the public to request a public hearing.
EFFECTIVE DATE: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-108214-15),
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Explanation of Provisions
Under section 1297 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), a foreign corporation is a PFIC if either 75 percent or more of its gross income for the taxable year is passive income ("passive income test"), or on average 50 percent or more of its assets produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income ("passive asset test"). Section 1297(b)(1) generally defines the term "passive income" to mean any income of a kind that would be "foreign personal holding company income" as defined in section 954(c). In general, an asset is characterized as passive if it generates (or is reasonably expected to generate in the reasonably foreseeable future) passive income as defined in section 1297(b). Assets that generate both passive and non-passive income in a taxable year are treated as partly passive and partly non-passive assets in proportion to the relative amounts of income generated by those assets in that year. See Notice 88-22, 1988-1 CB 489 (
For purposes of applying the passive income test, section 1297(b)(2)(B) provides that, except as provided in regulations, the term "passive income" does not include any income that is derived in the active conduct of an insurance business by a corporation which is predominantly engaged in an insurance business and which would be subject to tax under subchapter L as an insurance company if the corporation were a domestic corporation. As the terms "active conduct" and "insurance business" are not defined in section 1297, Treasury and the
The proposed regulations provide that the term "active conduct" has the same meaning as in
FOOTNOTE 1 Cf. Committee on
The proposed regulations do not set forth a method to determine the portion of assets held to meet obligations under insurance and annuity contracts. Comments are requested on appropriate methodologies for determining the extent to which assets are held to meet obligations under insurance and annuity contracts.
The proposed regulations also do not define what it means to be "predominantly engaged" in an insurance business. Prior to 1984, the Code did not define an insurance company. Section 1.801-3(a) of the regulations, however, provides in relevant part that an insurance company is a company whose primary and predominant business activity during the taxable year is the issuing of insurance or annuity contracts or the reinsuring of risks underwritten by insurance companies.
In 1984,
FOOTNOTE 2 Committee on
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to apply on the date of publication of the Treasury decision adopting these rules as final regulations in the
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5
Comments and Requests for Public Hearing
--This is a summary of a
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
CFR Part: "26 CFR Part 1"
RIN Number: "RIN 1545-BM69"
Citation: "80 FR 22954"
Document Number: "REG-108214-15"
Federal Register Page Number: "22954"
"Proposed Rules"


Restrictions on Sale of Assets of a Failed Institution by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Advisor News
- The missing piece in most retirement plans
- Clients are bringing TikTok insurance advice into advisor meetings
- Embracing a family-centric approach to financial planning
- Family communication: Financial planning’s growing blind spot
- Americans aren’t turning retirement plans into action, LIMRA finds
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Cayman Islands premier to meet with U.S. reinsurance regulators
- Investigation finds deceptive sales, churning of annuities targeting postal workers
- Corebridge annuity sales slip ahead of Equitable marriage
- California teachers settle class-action lawsuit over in-plan annuity fees
- Jackson Financial CEO caps 40-year career with blockbuster Q2
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Healey announces campaign to help residents hold onto their healthcare coverage
- State agency seeks
waiver to reinstate
HIP cost-sharing
- IN NEW ASSAULT ON TRANS YOUTH CARE, TRUMP ADMINISTRATION BARS MEDICAID AND CHIP COVERAGE FOR NECESSARY HEALTH CARE
- PAUL KRUGMAN: US HEALTH CARE IS ALREADY SOCIALIST
- Editorial: Louisianans losing health care coverage
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- LIMRA: Individual life sales continue growth trend in Q2, led by whole life and VUL
- New York Life Awards 20 Golden Futures Scholarships, Expanding Student Support Through Financial Education and Career Development
- Built to Last: Winston-Salem—a quiet industrial powerhouse
- The silver economy ushers in a new era of life insurance growth
- Family communication: Financial planning’s growing blind spot
More Life Insurance News