Conforming Amendment to the Section 184 Indian Housing Loan Guarantee Program Regulations
| Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
Final rule.
CFR Part: "24 CFR Part 1005"
RIN Number: "RIN 2577-AC91"
Citation: "79 FR 12382"
Document Number: "Docket No. FR-5772-F-01"
"Rules and Regulations"
SUMMARY: This final rule revises the regulations governing the Section 184 Indian Housing Loan Guarantee program (Section 184 program) to conform to a recent statutory change. The 2013 Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act amends section 184(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 by authorizing HUD to increase the fee for the guarantee of Section 184 loans up to 3 percent of the principal obligation of the loan and to establish the amount of the fee by publishing a notice in the
DATES: Effective Date:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 184 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-550, approved
The Section 184 program charges borrowers a guarantee fee to participate in the program and the fee, along with other funds and appropriations, is used to fulfill obligations of the Secretary with respect to the loans guaranteed under this section. Section 184(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 limited the guarantee fee to a maximum of 1 percent of the principal obligation, and HUD set the guarantee fee at 1 percent by regulation. (See 24 CFR 1005.109.) The 2013 Consolidated Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 113-6, approved
II. This Final Rule
This final rule codifies in regulation HUD's new authority by revising the guarantee fee language in
III. Justification for Final Rulemaking
In general, HUD publishes a rule for public comment before issuing a rule for effect, in accordance with HUD's regulations on rulemaking at 24 CFR part 10. Part 10, however, provides in
HUD finds that good cause exists to publish this rule for effect without soliciting public comment in that prior public procedure is unnecessary. This final rule codifies, in its Section 184 regulations, without change, HUD's new statutory authority to increase the Section 184 guarantee fee up to 3 percent of the principal obligation.
IV. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Review--Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if the regulation is necessary, to select the regulatory approach that maximizes net benefits. As discussed above in this preamble, this final rule updates the regulation to reflect HUD's new statutory authority only. As a result, this rule was determined to not be a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and therefore was not reviewed by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)) generally requires an agency to conduct regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Since notice and comment rulemaking is not necessary for this rule, the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354, 5 U.S.C. 601-612) do not apply.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled "Federalism") prohibits an agency from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule either imposes substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments and is not required by statute, or the rule preempts state law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order. This final rule will not have federalism implications and would not impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state law within the meaning of the Executive Order.
Environmental Review
This final rule does not direct, provide for assistance or loan and mortgage insurance for, or otherwise govern, or regulate, real property acquisition, disposition, leasing, rehabilitation, alteration, demolition, or new construction, or establish, revise or provide for standards for construction or construction materials, manufactured housing, or occupancy. Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(1), this final rule is categorically excluded from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements for federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on state, local, and tribal governments, and the private sector. This final rule does not impose any federal mandates on any state, local, or tribal government, or the private sector within the meaning of UMRA.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 1005
Indians, Loan programs-Indians, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, HUD amends 24 CFR part 1005 to read as follows:
PART 1005--LOAN GUARANTEES FOR INDIAN HOUSING
1. The authority citation for part 1005 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1715z-13a, 15 U.S.C. 1639c, 42 U.S.C. 3535(d).
2. Revise
HUD shall establish and collect, at the time of issuance of the guarantee, a fee for the guarantee of loans under this section, in an amount not exceeding 3 percent of the principal obligation of the loan, or any increase established by statute. HUD shall establish the amount of the fee by publishing a notice in the
Dated:
Assistant Secretary for Public and
[FR Doc. 2014-04514 Filed 3-4-14;
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
| Copyright: | (c) 2014 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
| Wordcount: | 1399 |



Administrative Simplification: Certification of Compliance for Health Plans; Extension of Comment Period
Advisor News
- Health-related costs are the greatest threat to retirement security
- Social Security literacy is crucial for advisors
- The $25T market opportunity in mid-market and mass-affluent households
- Advisors must lead the policy risk conversation
- Gen X more anxious than baby boomers about retirement
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- CT commissioner: 70% of policyholders covered in PHL liquidation plan
- ‘I get confused:’ Regulators ponder increasing illustration complexities
- Three ways the Corebridge/Equitable merger could shake up the annuity market
- Corebridge, Equitable merge to create potential new annuity sales king
- LIMRA: Final retail annuity sales total $464.1 billion in 2025
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- SENATE COMMITTEE PASSES BIOMARKER TESTING COVERAGE BILL ACS CAN URGES FULL SENATE TO FOLLOW SUIT
- Navigator cuts leave Americans with less help to find Obamacare plans
- Virginia orders rate cuts for 16 Aflac policies
- Virginia insurance regulators order rate cuts for several Aflac policies
- State-run insurance plans for foster kids leave some of them without doctors
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Virginia orders rate cuts for 16 Aflac policies
- Virginia insurance regulators order rate cuts for several Aflac policies
- Life insurers post modest gains following record 2024, S&P Global finds
- Aflac overcharging Virginians, SCC finds
- Virginia orders rate cuts for Aflac policies
More Life Insurance News