Supreme Court allows Medicaid cuts to Planned Parenthood
The Supreme Court cleared the way for states to kick Planned Parenthood out of Medicaid.
In a 6-3 decision released today, the high court ruled that federal law doesn’t allow Medicaid patients to bring lawsuits that allege their state has abridged their right to visit their preferred medical provider.
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of South Carolina over its effort to defund Planned Parenthood, concluding that individual Medicaid patients cannot sue to enforce their right to pick a medical provider.
In 2018, Gov. Henry McMaster issued an executive order that prohibited Planned Parenthood of South Atlantic, the local affiliate of the national group, from providing family planning services under Medicaid.
Julie Edwards, a Medicaid-eligible patient who wants to use Planned Parenthood, joined a lawsuit filed by the group, saying that under federal civil rights law she could enforce her rights in court.
Federal law has long banned federal money from being used for abortions. But Planned Parenthood clinics provide many other health care services that are typically eligible for payment under Medicaid.
The ruling will make it easier for states to deprive Planned Parenthood — and other clinics that provide abortions — from receiving Medicaid payments for any of their other non-abortion-related care.
The court’s conservative majority ruled that while federal law guarantees Medicaid beneficiaries the right to see any “qualified and willing” provider, the statute doesn’t grant patients legal standing to sue if a state denies access to certain providers.
© Entire contents copyright 2025 by InsuranceNewsNet.com Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reprinted without the expressed written consent from InsuranceNewsNet.com.



Health plan regulatory changes happening ‘fast and furious’
Parliamentarian rejects Medicaid provisions in ‘big beautiful bill’
Advisor News
- Pay or Die: The scare tactics behind LA County’s Measure ER tax increase
- How to listen to what your client isn’t saying
- Strong underwriting: what it means for insurers and advisors
- Retirement is increasingly defined by a secure income stream
- Addressing the ‘menopause tax:’ A guide for advisors with female clients
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- MassMutual turns 175, Marking Generations of Delivering on its Commitments
- ALIRT Insurance Research: U.S. Life Insurance Industry In Transition
- My Annuity Store Launches a Free AI Annuity Research Assistant Trained on 146 Carrier Brochures and Live Annuity Rates
- Ameritas settles with Navy vet in lawsuit over disputed annuity sale
- NAIC annuity guidance updates divide insurance and advisory groups
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Business People: General Mills veteran Dana McNabb named COO
- CONFEREES ADOPT COMMERCE PACKAGE WITH MEAT RAFFLE INCREASE, NO INSURANCE LOOPHOLE FIX
- GLP-1 Drug Costs Cited as Heights Schools Hike Taxes and Cut Staff
- Pay or Die: The scare tactics behind LA County’s Measure ER tax increase
- Column: N.C.’s Medicaid ‘compromise’ comes at a cruel cost
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- 2025 Insurance Abstracts
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Berkshire Hathaway Life Insurance Company of Nebraska and First Berkshire Hathaway Life Insurance Company
- Generational expectations: A challenge for the industry
- Greg Lindberg asks NC judge for no jail time in bribery, fraud cases
- National Life Group Names Brenda Betts to Its Board of Directors
More Life Insurance News