EDITORIAL: Rail overbids force reappraisal
| By The Honolulu Star-Advertiser | |
| McClatchy-Tribune Information Services |
This raises alarm bells, not merely that costs are rising in an accelerating construction market but real fears that they're doing so at a pace that will burn through even the generous contingency fund set aside for such overruns.
There's enormous urgency for the
HART Executive Director
However, with about 35 percent of the project still left to contract for
"Clearly our estimates right now are suspect,"
Grabauskas said the executive office is poring through the bids to discover what factors are driving the high prices. He declined to go public with any potential cost-saving ideas, beyond saying that the bid likely relates to the size of the project: nine stations in one contract.
Additional factors include the complexity of the work required and the "compressed" schedule -- time lost in court is being recouped through an accelerated timeline, he said, a schedule that may be forcing prospective bidders to increase projections of both labor and equipment costs.
The construction calendar was shortened in an effort to make a 2017 deadline to open part of the system, roughly the first 10 miles. However, officials ought to consider pushing that off if it means significant savings can be achieved.
The Ironclad deadline for the start of operation, under the federal full-funding agreement, is
HART needs to look for other ways of setting up the contracts that would encourage more competitive bidding, given the somewhat limited availability of subcontractors for the longer term of a nine-station project. Officials need to figure whether enough savings await to warrant rebidding this project, but at the very least, restructuring the next contracts in line must be explored.
Grabauskas also said the commitment to the federal government is to budget for a
The "red-hot" construction economy that Grabauskas described may yield enhanced tax revenues for the project, but the authority can't count on that. HART should work to leave some money in the account to launch a system that's built well and with fiscal support.
If adjusting the financial planning means the trial run will have to start a year or so later, most taxpayers would see that as preferable to landing in a sea of red ink.
___
(c)2014 The Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Visit The Honolulu Star-Advertiser at www.staradvertiser.com
Distributed by MCT Information Services
| Wordcount: | 677 |



Advisor News
- Why aligning wealth and protection strategies will define 2026 planning
- Finseca and IAQFP announce merger
- More than half of recent retirees regret how they saved
- Tech group seeks additional context addressing AI risks in CSF 2.0 draft profile connecting frameworks
- How to discuss higher deductibles without losing client trust
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Allianz Life Launches Fixed Index Annuity Content on Interactive Tool
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company Trademark Application for “SMART WEIGHTING” Filed: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- Somerset Re Appoints New Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer as Firm Builds on Record-Setting Year
- Indexing the industry for IULs and annuities
- United Heritage Life Insurance Company goes live on Equisoft’s cloud-based policy administration system
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Sick of fighting insurers, hospitals offer their own Medicare Advantage plans
- After loss of tax credits, WA sees a drop in insurance coverage
- My Spin: The healthcare election
- COLUMN: Working to lower the cost of care for Kentucky families
- Is cost of health care top election issue?
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News