WA hospitals push for veto of lower state insurance reimbursements
The bill is designed to reduce health care costs for the state. But the
"Just because [the state is] paying less doesn't mean it costs less to provide the care," said
Reducing payments to hospitals for state and school employees would likely increase the cost of care for others because hospitals would negotiate with other insurers to make up the difference, according to the hospital association. If those negotiations aren't successful, hospitals could look at reducing jobs or services.
Supporters of the policy argue that health care is unaffordable and that this bill would help reduce out-of-pocket costs for patients. They also say that hospitals could lower executive pay before turning to layoffs and service reductions.
Independent rural hospitals would be exempt under the bill. In
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, health care systems were "completely upended," said
Hospitals would also be subject to higher business and occupation tax rates that the Legislature approved, which would be around
An amendment to have hospitals exempted from the tax hike after 2027 was unsuccessful.


States should implement creative Medicaid reforms, expert says
7 issues shaping SC’s $14.5B state budget debate
Advisor News
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
- Are families ready for the costs of aging at home?
- When a client moves, their insurance plan needs to move, too
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
- Financial stress leaves less room for retirement saving
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
- Global Atlantic names Dan Farrelly head of IMO and IBD channels
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
- AM Best downgrades A-Cap insurers amid financial and regulatory troubles
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News