Sens. Warner & Kaine Urge Improved Lead Testing for Children on Medicaid & CHIP
"Millions of at-risk children are never screened and tested for high lead levels, despite early childhood lead screening and testing requirements," said the lawmakers in the letter. "The devastating impact of lead poisoning requires that CMS do everything it can to help healthcare providers quickly identify and track children who have been exposed to lead."
Lead exposure can have life-long health effects, including difficulty learning in school and behavioral problems like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Despite these universal screening requirements, a
Full text of the letter is below and available here https://www.scribd.com/document/318731928/2016-07-15-CMS-leadTesting-outgoing.
Mr.
Acting Administrator
Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt:
We write to urge the
According to a recently published Reuters investigation Unsafe at Any Level, our country is failing when it comes to screening and testing at-risk children for lead. Data from the
First, CMS should review and update its
In 2012, CMS updated its policy to align with recommendations from the
Second, CMS should develop strategies to enhance adherence to lead screening policies by providing states with guidance on opportunities to maximize screening and testing in their states. There are many barriers beyond current CMS policy that prevent children from getting screened and tested: providers frequently do not know whom they are required to screen and test, parents often lack the information they need to determine whether or not their child is "at-risk" and should be tested, reimbursement rates remain low for providers in many states, and there are few policies in place to ensure adherence to current CMS policies on lead screening.
In order to ensure all at-risk children are appropriately screened, CMS should work to identify potential barriers to screening and testing and provide resources for states to overcome these challenges. CMS should facilitate partnerships between state
In addition, CMS should evaluate and promulgate guidance on alternative methods for screening and testing that may help states meet their screening requirements. For example, screening and testing at the point-of-care - as opposed to sending out samples to a laboratory - may provide an opportunity to increase compliance with screening mandates, as well as improve care and efficiency for at-risk children and their families. Pilot studies show that it is possible to use the same blood draw to perform point-of-care blood lead testing and other screenings. By providing alternative ways for children to be screened and tested, communities with lead challenges may be able to improve compliance and identify at-risk children early on.
Third, we urge CMS to partner with federal and state partners to identify lead abatement opportunities and support follow-up treatment for children who have elevated blood lead levels. As you know, when dealing with lead poisoning, early intervention is crucial. Children who are not regularly screened often go undiagnosed and untreated for elevated lead levels because of the lack of identifiable symptoms. Unfortunately, we have seen what happens when lead exposure is overlooked: serious damage to the heart, kidneys, reproductive system, brain and central nervous system. Lead exposure is particularly harmful to the developing brains and nervous systems of young children--even low levels of exposure are associated with irreversible neurologic damage and behavioral disorders. We cannot afford to let more children suffer the consequences of a lack of attention to this issue.
CMS policy on follow-up care for children with elevated blood lead levels requires that state
The tragedy in
We look forward to your prompt attention to this issue, and your response.
Sincerely,
Read this original document at: http://www.warner.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/pressreleases?ContentRecord_id=A236454B-2FE9-4504-AC7C-545566651770


Advisor News
- Benefit Costs Squeeze Schools, Driving Cuts, Tax Hikes And Difficult Tradeoffs
- Why client insurance needs could change even if their life doesn’t
- Most Gen Z investors think less than a year ahead when making financial decisions
- IRI pitches retirement agenda to Jeffries as democrats shape affordability platform
- Help child-free clients plan for their later years
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Guidance, bulletin or reg? NAIC debates form of annuity illustration update
- Nationwide adds mutual fund-linked strategy to New Heights Select FIA
- NUNN INTRODUCES BILL TO CUT RED TAPE, GIVE IOWANS CLEARER INSURANCE INFORMATION
- NAIC working group pressed to accelerate annuity illustration overhaul
- State Auditor James Brown Kicks Off Life Insurance Awareness Month With Policy Locator Tool
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News