Retirement Investment Fund Conflicts Cost Americans
As retirement funds have shifted from defined benefit to defined contribution, Americans are required to directly manage their own retirement plans for which good investment advice is essential.
To ensure that investors receive sound investment advice, the
While laudable, the new rule fails to address two big remaining problems with the current system--conflicts of interest and a lack of transparency, according to
Conflicts of interest arise when advisers receive fees from investment sponsors that create an incentive to recommend investments that are not necessarily in the best interest of the beneficiaries. Their research finds that when such conflicts of interest exist in defined benefit plans (because the executive of the firm is also a fiduciary), trading decisions by these plans hurt beneficiaries.
We need to learn from the experience of defined benefit plans and proactively prevent conflicts of interest in defined contribution plans, said
Seyhun and colleagues
The current rule also permits proprietary products in the retirement portfolio. These products can include combinations of stocks, bonds and derivatives; investments in startups and other private investment vehicles; or investments in assets such as forests, mines or works of art. The key feature of proprietary investments is that they are unique to the financial institution offering them.
Consequently, there is little or no historical performance or risk data, and the information about them is limited to what the sponsor provides. Their research demonstrates that such products often provide inferior return for the risk they entail.
"As they stand, the current investment advisory rules are deeply flawed," said Narayanan, professor of finance. "They suffer from internal conflicts since they require that investment advisers act in the best interest of the beneficiaries yet they allow them to receive income from third parties. The conflict problem is compounded by allowing proprietary products that lack transparency in retirement portfolios."
Add to that, many Americans either aren't saving anything or have less than
"Clearly, the current defined contribution plans for retirement savings are not working very well for the typical American," Seyhun said.
Avci said they recommend the following changes to the policies:
* Prohibit third-party income. Investment advisers should serve only one master--the investor.
* Disallow proprietary investment vehicles. These vehicles often have complex features that are difficult for the average investor to understand and analyze. Proprietary investment products are also likely to involve higher transaction costs and underperform.
* Permit only passive index funds with broadly diversified portfolios be given the tax exempt status of retirement contributions.
"Conflicted advice promotes investment options that are profitable for the brokerage firms, and tend to be underperforming, overly costly and undiversified from the beneficiary's perspective," Avci said.
More information:
*
* MP Narayanan (https://michiganross.umich.edu/faculty-research/faculty/mp-narayanan)
30TagarumaMar-5759743 30TagarumaMar


Reps. Grijalva, Pallone Highlight Indian Country Impacts of Repealing Affordable Care Act
Advisor News
- Flourish brings private-bank-like cash solution to MassMutual’s network
- Majority of Americans concerned recent market highs are unsustainable
- GLP-1 users choose between medication and retirement saving
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
- Are families ready for the costs of aging at home?
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- A client remarried: Does their annuity still fit?
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
- Global Atlantic names Dan Farrelly head of IMO and IBD channels
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News