Patent Issued for Event information collection system (USPTO 11962845): United States Automobile Association (USAA)

2024 MAY 03 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Insurance Daily News -- From Alexandria, Virginia, NewsRx journalists report that a patent by the inventors Dahlman, Matthew C. (Selma, TX, US), Luck, Gideon B. (Wylie, TX, US), Tougas, Brian (Spring Branch, TX, US), White, Angelica N. (Spring Branch, TX, US), filed on April 12, 2023, was published online on April 16, 2024.

The patent’s assignee for patent number 11962845 is United States Automobile Association (USAA) (San Antonio, Texas, United States).

News editors obtained the following quote from the background information supplied by the inventors: “Insurance companies process many vehicle and personal injury claims from accidents and events. For example, there are approximately six million vehicle accidents every year in the United States. Finding witnesses who viewed the accident and interviewing them is costly and time-consuming, and witness testimonies can be inaccurate. Furthermore, the purchase of police reports associated with accidents is expensive.

“Video data and other recorded information of events often exists. Dash cameras and sensors that detect telematics data are generally inexpensive and easy to install. In addition, many people have a video-enabled smart phone that they use to film events. Video from events is often shared electronically via social networking applications and video websites.

“The techniques introduced here may be better understood by referring to the following Detailed Description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals indicate identical or functionally similar elements.”

As a supplement to the background information on this patent, NewsRx correspondents also obtained the inventors’ summary information for this patent: “Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to locating, identifying, and retrieving video data of an accident or other event that can be used to determine the circumstances of the event. When an event occurs, such as two vehicles colliding, it may be difficult to determine who was at fault. There may be contributing factors associated with the event, such as rate of speed, weather, obstacles such as traffic, pedestrians and bicyclists, etc. Sometimes a vehicle has a dash camera installed that shows one view of the event. Witnesses can be hard or impossible to locate as they drive by the scene without stopping. Some witnesses will have dash camera video data of the scene, while others may record video data on their phone. If available, this video data could help resolve the circumstances around the event. Technological advantages are realized as multiple views of an event, including information from before and after the event, can be helpful when resolving a dispute or determining the circumstances of the event.

“In some embodiments, users can download an application onto their personal device that tracks their position (e.g., using global positioning system (GPS) data) and uploads their location information to a memory. When an event occurs, a location and time associated with an event can be determined, either by a person, GPS data, meta-data associated with video data, etc. From this, a geographic range of interest and a time duration of interest can automatically be determined. The memory storing many users’ GPS data can be searched to identify a match with the event. For example, a user not involved with the event may have driven by the event and have applicable dash camera video data, or the uninvolved user may have been present in the area and filmed the event, either on purpose or inadvertently, such as in the background of another video. An entity can contact the user to ask if they have knowledge or video of the event. This provides a technological improvement by providing a new interface that can temporally and geographically tag recorded data and query against it to identify both people who may have witnessed an event and helpful video data to resolve disputes involving accidents and other events.

“In other embodiments, an entity can identify the geographic range of interest and time duration of interest based on a location and time of an event. The entity can then search their own video database as well as others for a match. The entity can further search video websites, networks or aggregators (e.g., YouTube™, etc.), such as by reviewing meta-data associated with video data, to find a match. The entity can submit queries to other businesses that may acquire video data (e.g., fleet-based businesses, smart city infrastructure, etc.) to request video data based on the identified parameters. Furthermore, machine learning can be used to identify whether content in the video data corresponds to the event. This provides a technological improvement as video websites can have millions of posted videos, making it previously impossible for an individual to independently search for and review posted video data to locate a match with the event. However, the data aggregation system described herein, which can use video meta-data and machine learning to search these video websites for event data introduce this new technical ability to locate video matching an event.

“In yet other embodiments, the application on the personal device can upload video data and other information associated with the event to the entity. The user may or may not be involved in the event, and the user may or may not be a member of the entity organization. The user can be offered an incentive to upload the video data and other data, improving the possibility that the entity will receive data that contributes to the resolution of, or clarifies circumstances related to, the event. A technological improvement is realized as automated video and other data submissions matching event characteristics can be forwarded to the entity in a timely manner (even in real-time), providing information that can eliminate the need to access alternate data sources (e.g., police reports, witness accounts, etc.)

“Several implementations are discussed below in more detail in reference to the figures. FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an overview of devices on which some implementations of the disclosed technology can operate. The devices can comprise hardware components of a device 100 that can receive video data, record video data, and/or provide information associated with an accident or event to another entity in various formats (e.g., text, audio, video, etc.). Device 100 can include one or more input devices 120 that provide input to the Processor(s) 110 (e.g. CPU(s), GPU(s), HPU(s), etc.), notifying it of actions. The actions can be mediated by a hardware controller that interprets the signals received from the input device 120 and communicates the information to the processors 110 using a communication protocol. Input devices 120 include, for example, a mouse, a keyboard, a touchscreen, an infrared sensor, a touchpad, a wearable input device, a camera- or image-based input device, a microphone, or other user input devices.”

The claims supplied by the inventors are:

“1. A method for requesting video data associated with an event, the method comprising: determining an event location and an event time associated with the event; identifying A) a geographic range associated with the event location and B) a time duration associated with the event time; generating query parameters for querying meta-data associated with video data stored in at least two video storage sources; and automatically querying the at least two video storage sources, using the query parameters, to obtain video files that correspond to the geographic range and the time duration, wherein the video files comprise video data associated with the event, wherein a first video storage source of the at least two video storage sources includes at least video data acquired by cameras associated with vehicles, and wherein a second video storage source of the at least two video storage sources is a publicly available video aggregator of videos posted by a plurality of entities.

“2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving, from a dash camera installed in a vehicle, global positioning system (GPS) tracking data associated with at least one user; and storing the tracking data in association with timing data.

“3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining that an initial query did not provide the video data depicting the event and in response: identifying the geographic range by increasing a previously determined geographic range or identifying the time duration by increasing a previously determined time duration.

“4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: identifying, in the video files by applying one or more machine learning models, that the video data can be used to identify a vehicle rate of speed, weather conditions, presence of an obstacle, or any combination thereof, in relation to the event.

“5. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least two video storage sources include a storage that receives video data recorded by a plurality of fleet vehicles, the fleet vehicles including GPS tracking devices and dash cameras, which provide the video data and corresponding location data.

“6. The method of claim 1, wherein the event location and the event time are determined based on telematics from a vehicle associated with the event.

“7. The method of claim 1, wherein the event location and the event time were specified, in a user interface, by at least one user.

“8. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed by a computing system, cause the computing system to perform a process for requesting video data associated with an event, the process comprising: determining an event location and an event time associated with the event; identifying A) a geographic range associated with the event location and B) a time duration associated with the event time; and automatically querying the at least two video storage sources to obtain video files that correspond to the geographic range and the time duration, wherein the video files comprise video data associated with the event, wherein a first video storage source of the at least two video storage sources includes at least video data acquired by cameras associated with vehicles, and wherein a second video storage source of the at least two video storage sources is a publicly available video aggregator of videos posted by a plurality of entities.

“9. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, wherein the process further comprises: receiving, from a dash camera installed in a vehicle, global positioning system (GPS) tracking data associated with at least one user; and storing the tracking data in association with timing data.

“10. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, wherein the process further comprises: determining that an initial query did not provide the video data depicting the event and in response: identifying the geographic range by increasing a previously determined geographic range or identifying the time duration by increasing a previously determined time duration.

“11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, wherein the process further comprises: identifying, in the video files by applying one or more machine learning models, that the video data can be used to identify a vehicle rate of speed, presence of an obstacle, or any combination thereof, in relation to the event.

“12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, wherein the at least two video storage sources include a storage that receives video data recorded by a plurality of fleet vehicles, the fleet vehicles including GPS tracking devices and dash cameras, which provide the video data and corresponding location data.

“13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, wherein the event location and the event time are determined based on telematics from a vehicle associated with the event.

“14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8, wherein the event location and the event time were specified, in a user interface, by at least one user.

“15. A computing system for requesting video data associated with an event, the computing system comprising: one or more processors; and one or more memories storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to perform a process comprising: determining an event location and an event time associated with the event; identifying A) a geographic range associated with the event location and B) a time duration associated with the event time; and automatically querying at least two video storage sources to obtain video files that correspond to the geographic range and the time duration, wherein a first video storage source of the at least two video storage sources includes at least video data acquired by cameras associated with vehicles, and wherein a second video storage source of the at least two video storage sources is a publicly available video aggregator of videos posted by one or more entities.

“16. The computing system according to claim 15, wherein the process further comprises: receiving, from a dash camera installed in a vehicle, global positioning system (GPS) tracking data associated with at least one user; and storing the tracking data in association with timing data.

“17. The computing system according to claim 15, wherein the process further comprises: determining that an initial query did not provide the video data depicting the event and in response: identifying the geographic range by increasing a previously determined geographic range or identifying the time duration by increasing a previously determined time duration.

“18. The computing system according to claim 15, wherein the process further comprises: identifying, in the video files by applying one or more machine learning models, that the video data can be used to identify a vehicle rate of speed in relation to the event.

“19. The computing system according to claim 15, wherein the at least two video storage sources include a storage that receives video data recorded by a plurality of fleet vehicles, the fleet vehicles including GPS tracking devices and dash cameras, which provide the video data and corresponding location data.

“20. The computing system according to claim 15, wherein the event location and the event time are determined based on telematics from a vehicle associated with the event.”

For additional information on this patent, see: Dahlman, Matthew C. Event information collection system. U.S. Patent Number 11962845, filed April 12, 2023, and published online on April 16, 2024. Patent URL (for desktop use only): https://ppubs.uspto.gov/pubwebapp/external.html?q=(11962845)&db=USPAT&type=ids

(Our reports deliver fact-based news of research and discoveries from around the world.)