OPTIONAL MEDICAID AND CHIP COVERAGE FOR LAWFULLY PRESENT IMMIGRANT CHILDREN COULD MITIGATE COVERAGE LOSSES DUE TO 2025 RECONCILIATION LAW
The following information was released by the
Authors:
Published:
Summary
Actionstaken by the Trump administration and
This brief provides an overview of health coverage of noncitizen children based on KFF analysis of 2024
As of
Noncitizen children are more likely to be uninsured than citizen children. Recent noncitizen children in the
The uninsured rate for noncitizen children living in states that have adopted ICHIA coverage for children is lower compared to the rate for noncitizen children living in states that have not (25% vs 37%), likely reflecting a combination of ICHIA coverage and other more expansive coverage policies in these states.
Together, the data show that Medicaid, CHIP, and other public coverage help reduce uninsured rates for noncitizen children, particularly recent noncitizen children living in ICHIA states. Maintaining ICHIA coverage could help mitigate coverage losses for lawfully present immigrant children as the 2025 reconciliation law eligibility restrictions go into effect. Additionally, implementation of ICHIA coverage in the states that have not yet adopted it or that have room to expand it for either children or pregnant people could further limit coverage losses. Even with ICHIA coverage in place, outreach and communication to families and effective processes to screen individuals for eligibility under the option will be important for preventing administrative coverage losses among those eligible as new restrictions are implemented.
Medicaid and CHIP Coverage Under the ICHIA Option
Prior to the 2025 reconciliation law, undocumented immigrants were already ineligible for Medicaid, CHIP, and other federally funded coverage, and lawfully present immigrants faced eligibility restrictions for Medicaid and CHIP. In 1996, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act limited Medicaid and CHIP eligibility to certain groups of lawfully present immigrants deemed to have a "qualified status" and required many of these groups to wait at least five years before they could enroll even if they met other eligibility criteria (Table 1). As such, many lawfully present immigrants faced a five-year waiting period for coverage and others remained ineligible regardless of their length of time in the country, although some groups were exempt from the five-year waiting period. Lawfully present immigrants were eligible for
Since 2009, states have had the option to expand Medicaid and CHIP coverage for lawfully residing children and pregnant people under ICHIA. This option extends eligibility to lawfully residing children and/or pregnant people beyond those with "qualified status" and eliminates the five-year waiting period for coverage. As of
Health Coverage Among Noncitizen Children
As of 2024, there were approximately 2.6 million noncitizen children ages 0 to 18 residing in the
Noncitizen children are significantly more likely to be uninsured than their citizen counterparts (Figure 2). Recent noncitizen children are at the highest risk of being uninsured, with 28% lacking coverage compared to 22% of their longer-term noncitizen counterparts and 5% of citizens. The higher uninsured rate among noncitizen children reflects a lower rate of private coverage. Rates of public coverage for children are similar across citizenship status and length of time in the country. However, noncitizen children are more likely than their citizen counterparts to live in a low-income family and, therefore, are more likely to be eligible for public coverage yet enrolled at lower rates.
The uninsured rate for noncitizen children is significantly lower in states that have adopted the ICHIA option for children compared to the rate for noncitizen children in states that have not adopted this option (25% vs. 37%). This pattern holds true across both recent noncitizen children (27% vs. 35%) as well as longer-term noncitizen children (21% vs. 40%). The lower uninsured rate in these states is largely driven by higher rates of public coverage, particularly among recent noncitizen children. This likely reflects the expanded coverage to recent lawfully residing immigrant children who would otherwise be in the five-year waiting period as well as broader groups of lawfully residing immigrant children who do not have "qualified status." Additionally, as noted, some of these states have implemented other coverage expansions for immigrant children, such as fully state-funded programs, as well as broader expansions for the low-income population, including the ACA Medicaid expansion to low-income adults, which may have spillover effects on children's coverage. States with ICHIA coverage for children also cover a much larger number of noncitizen children than states without ICHIA, as over nine in ten (92%) of noncitizen children live in these 38 states.
ICHIA Coverage Under the 2025 Reconciliation Law
The 2025 reconciliation law limits eligibility for federally funded coverage, including Medicaid, CHIP, subsidized
The 2025 reconciliation law did not eliminate optional Medicaid and CHIP coverage for lawfully residing children and/or pregnant people under ICHIA. ICHIA coverage provides eligibility for a broader group of lawfully present immigrants in these groups who would otherwise no longer be eligible under the reconciliation law and also extends eligibility to recent immigrants who would otherwise be subject to the five-year waiting period for Medicaid and CHIP.
States could mitigate coverage losses for lawfully present immigrant children and pregnant people by maintaining or expanding ICHIA coverage. Overall, 11 states have not taken up ICHIA coverage for either children or pregnant people, 8 states have taken up the option for children but could expand it to pregnant people, and 2 states have taken up the option for pregnant people only but could expand it to children. Conversely, elimination of ICHIA coverage could exacerbate coverage losses for these groups. Some states facing budget pressures have recently cut back on state-funded coverage for immigrants. While no state has eliminated ICHIA coverage to date, states continue to face increasing budget pressures. ICHIA cannot mitigate coverage losses among non-pregnant adults who will no longer be eligible for Medicaid based on their immigration status.
Even with ICHIA coverage in place, outreach and education to families and effective eligibility screening processes will be important to prevent administrative losses among those still eligible as the reconciliation law changes are implemented. For example, as states implement new eligibility restrictions, it will be important to effectively screen people for eligibility under the ICHIA option to make sure they do not lose coverage if they are still eligible. Families may also be confused about shifting eligibility rules, which may be compounded by confusion and fears stemming from recent changes to public charge policies. Additionally, a couple of states almost inadvertently eliminated this coverage through state legislation to implement the 2025 reconciliation law, although these changes were eventually avoided.
Methods
Data sources: This brief is based on KFF analysis of federal survey data, namely the
Identifying citizenship status:
Defining insurance coverage categories: Private insurance coverage included employer-sponsored and direct purchase insurance plans. Public insurance coverage included Medicare, Medicaid, and military-sponsored insurance plans.
Defining state take-up of ICHIA: Information on state take-up of ICHIA is based on


public notice
STUDY GAUGES EFFICIENCY OF AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AT REDUCING UNINSURED RATES
Advisor News
- The conversation almost no advisor is having yet
- Why advisors should offer retirement-longevity planning
- A hybrid approach outperforms the 4% Rule, researchers find
- The missing piece in most retirement plans
- Clients are bringing TikTok insurance advice into advisor meetings
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Industry pushes back on linking ‘financial strength’ to annuity illustrations
- Sammons Enterprises & Sammons Financial Group Respond to Reports
- The Manhattan Life Insurance Company Acquires Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York
- Cayman Islands premier to meet with U.S. reinsurance regulators
- Investigation finds deceptive sales, churning of annuities targeting postal workers
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News
- Securian Financial Increases Individual Life Retention to $10 Million, Strengthening Support for High-Net-Worth Life Insurance Market
- Americans without children are less confident about retirement, Allianz finds
- The conversation almost no advisor is having yet
- DELAWARE INSURANCE DEPARTMENT DETAILS REVIEW OF BRIGHTHOUSE ACQUISITION
- Sammons Enterprises & Sammons Financial Group Respond to Reports
More Life Insurance News