NY Governor’s Veto Leaves Pet Insurers Off Leash | Insurify
Pet owners in
Gov.
In her veto memo, Hochul said the bill was "duplicative" since pet insurance "is already authorized in the state." The legislation "would cause confusion as to which substantive provisions of the Insurance Law would apply," the veto memo stated.
"It is my understanding that they believe that the bill should be an amendment that creates pet insurance within what is considered animal insurance, instead of creating a new regulatory framework around pet insurance, specifically," Assembly woman
The governor's office didn't respond to an email and voice message requesting comment.
What the bill would have done
In July, Hunter said that the bill's intention was to ensure "that there are standards within the [pet insurance] industry that have already been adopted in other states."
The bill would have established uniform definitions for pet insurance terms and multiple disclosure requirements, including whether a policy excludes pre-existing conditions, hereditary disorders, congenital anomalies, or chronic conditions.
It also would have banned waiting periods for accident-only coverage and limited waiting periods for illnesses and orthopedic conditions. Many pet insurance companies establish waiting periods — a time during which the insurer won't cover claims.
"I believe there should be differentiation between pet wellness policy products and healthcare products," Hunter told Insurify via email. "The bill standardizes these types of policies, brings transparency and clarity to what consumers are getting, and allows for better policy writing by bringing
Currently, 11 states have specific laws regulating pet insurance, according to the
What's next?
Hochul's veto memo noted that the state's current insurance laws already apply to animals. But pet insurance differs from the kind of animal insurance the governor referred to, Hunter explained.
"Animal insurance is part of property and casualty, which can cover things such as the liability on farm animals, for example," she said. "Pet insurance, on the other hand, is intended to be a form of health insurance specifically for household pets."
As the bill moved through the Assembly and
"I plan to reintroduce the bill in 2025 and will work with the governor's office and the
Related articles


Digest
I could shoot someone in the middle of 5th Avenue
Advisor News
- Your client’s $3 million portfolio doesn’t tell you their insurance needs
- How life insurance can provide liquidity for wealthy families
- Retirement providers turn to digital engagement to retain assets
- Looking out for clients with diminished mental capacity
- House panel advances CLEAR Forms Act backed by IRI
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
- AM Best downgrades A-Cap insurers amid financial and regulatory troubles
- Lawsuit claims Delaware Life hid billions in insurer-linked investments
- AM Best to Deliver Presentation at 2026 ACLI Annual Conference
- Global Atlantic Announces Launch of ForeLifetime Income, a New Fixed Index Annuity
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News