Lawsuit alleges Criminal District Court cost staffers thousands in retirement savings
Six
Those two payouts appear to be the only time the court has offered retirement-savings settlements to its employees since 2010, when another set of staffers sued the court for its failure to enroll them in the same pension plan: the Louisiana State Employees' Retirement System, or LASERS.
Those who participate in the plan contribute 7.5% of their pay, which is matched by the court. Combined, it earns an accrual rate of 2.5%, until the employees retire and begin making withdrawals.
In their lawsuit — filed Wednesday in
Sources familiar with the situation estimate the court's portion of the costs are more than
A history of errors
According to the new lawsuit, the six employees first learned that they had not been properly enrolled in LASERS two years ago, when they received copies of letters dated
"Until they received copies of these letters, none of the petitioners had reason to be aware that they should have been enrolled in LASERS as of their initial hire dates," the lawsuit states.
It remains unclear what prompted the court to send the letters more than a decade after it was first sued for the issue. In 2010, nine employees filed a similar lawsuit, alleging the court had failed to properly enroll them in LASERS until years into their employment. Then-Chief Judge
Ten years later, the first retirement settlement was paid to one of the lawsuit's plaintiffs.
Quiet payouts
Records show the court paid the employee more than
Neither Landrum nor Herman returned phone calls.
Two years ago, the court cut a second check: On
There do not appear to be any minutes or other records of any discussions the judges might have had about the payments.
Attempts to resolve
The new lawsuit says the six employees have attempted to resolve the issue with the court. "However, despite these demands, and despite the court's actions to remedy its errors for other employees in identical situations, the court has heretofore failed to take any action to remedy the injuries," the lawsuit states.
Records show that the court unsuccessfully tried to settle the matter through the
The court later brought the matter to the
Pittman, the chief judge, also did not return a call seeking comment.


Do you know how long you might live? The answer is an important part of planning for retirement
Wyoming joins 25-state suit over retirement savings rule
Advisor News
- How life insurance can provide liquidity for wealthy families
- Retirement providers turn to digital engagement to retain assets
- Looking out for clients with diminished mental capacity
- House panel advances CLEAR Forms Act backed by IRI
- Modifying life insurance based on evolving needs
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- AM Best to Deliver Presentation at 2026 ACLI Annual Conference
- Global Atlantic Announces Launch of ForeLifetime Income, a New Fixed Index Annuity
- A-Cap strikes back with lawsuit accusing SC regulators of sloppy process, leaking secrets
- AM Best to Discuss Its Views on Private Credit Surge and Risks at 2026 NAIC/NIPR Insurance Summit
- OID recovers $260M in life insurance benefits
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News