IIHS challenges automakers with tougher TOP SAFETY PICK award criteria
Despite the more stringent requirements, 71 models qualify for 2024 awards. Of those, 22 earn TOP SAFETY PICK+, and 49 earn TOP SAFETY PICK.
“We followed the tougher requirements we introduced last year with another major update to the award criteria in 2024,” said IIHS President
Last year’s biggest change was the replacement of the original side crash test with an updated version that uses a heavier barrier traveling at a higher speed. Initially, an acceptable or good rating was enough to garner the lower-tier TOP SAFETY PICK award. In 2024, a good rating is required for either TOP SAFETY PICK or TOP SAFETY PICK+.
In addition, vehicles now need an acceptable or good rating in a revised version of the pedestrian front crash prevention evaluation to qualify for either award. The new version replaces the earlier daytime and nighttime tests with a single evaluation that includes some test runs in daylight and some in the dark. Last year, vehicles could earn the lower-tier award regardless of whether they could detect and avoid pedestrians in the dark.
In an even bigger change, the updated moderate front overlap test has replaced the original evaluation in the 2024 TOP SAFETY PICK+ requirements. Vehicles now need an acceptable or good rating in the updated evaluation, which adds a second dummy seated behind the driver and emphasizes back seat safety. A good rating in the original moderate overlap test is still needed for the base
As before, to earn either award, a vehicle must offer good protection in a small overlap front crash, in which 25% of the vehicle’s width on either side collides with another vehicle or a stationary object. This year, the driver-side and passenger-side evaluations have been combined into a single rating. The test is performed on both the driver and passenger sides, and the rating is equivalent to the lower of the two results.
Award winners also must have good or acceptable headlights equipped on all trim levels.
By class, small SUVs, midsize SUVs and midsize luxury SUVs are tied for the most TOP SAFETY PICK+ awards, with five each. Midsize luxury SUVs, which qualify for an additional 12 TOP SAFETY PICK awards, earn the most awards overall. Relatively few cars and pickups qualify for either award.
“The high number of SUVs that earn awards probably reflects the dominance of those vehicles in the
The changes to the 2024 award criteria are designed to push automakers to pursue higher levels of safety.
IIHS introduced the original moderate overlap front test in 1995. At the time, most vehicles earned ratings of poor or marginal. For the past decade, virtually every vehicle tested has earned a good rating thanks to stronger vehicle structures, the introduction of front and side-curtain airbags and a series of improvements in seat belt technology.
That represents a big win for safety. An analysis of 14 years’ worth of crash data involving IIHS-rated vehicles shows that a driver of a model rated good in the original moderate overlap test is 46% less likely to die in a head-on crash with a similar vehicle, compared with a driver of a model rated poor.
IIHS introduced the updated test to encourage similar advancements in the back seat. Once, second-row occupants were substantially safer than those seated in the front because of the greater distance between them and the impact in a frontal crash. In today’s vehicles, though, there is barely any deformation of the occupant compartment in the moderate overlap test. In addition, automakers have added airbags and advanced seat belts in the front seats but not often in the rear. As a result, in vehicles from model year 2007 onward, the risk of a fatal injury is higher for belted occupants in the rear seat than in the front.
To spur automakers to address that gap, the updated test includes an additional dummy positioned in the second row behind the driver and utilizes new metrics that focus on the injuries most frequently seen in rear-seat occupants. Many automakers have made substantial progress since the first group of ratings was released in
The tougher standards for pedestrian front crash prevention systems are grounded in similar progress. In 2019, when IIHS launched the daytime vehicle-to-pedestrian evaluation, only 21% of the vehicles tested earned the highest rating of superior, while 44% of new models didn’t even offer the technology. By 2023, 59% of vehicles earned superior ratings in the daytime test, and 40% also earned superior ratings in the nighttime evaluation, which was introduced a year earlier.
An advanced or superior rating in the daytime test was required for a 2023 TOP SAFETY PICK award, and an advanced or superior rating in the nighttime test was necessary to earn the “plus.” For 2024, IIHS has combined the two tests into a single evaluation, making nighttime performance essential for either award. The superior/advanced/basic/no credit scale has been replaced by the good/acceptable/marginal/poor scale used for other IIHS evaluations. This subtle change recognizes that technology that detects and brakes for pedestrians should be expected on all vehicles.
Pedestrians represent an increasingly large share of crash deaths, and pedestrian fatalities are currently at their highest level since the early 1980s. Most pedestrian crashes occur during the day, when there are more people on the roads, but three-quarters of fatal pedestrian crashes happen at night.
“There’s still progress to be made in the protection that vehicles provide for their occupants, as the introduction of the updated moderate overlap test shows,” Harkey said. “But many of the biggest gains of the future will come from automakers and policymakers, along with all of us as car buyers and drivers, taking steps to protect everyone on the road, not just our own families.”
###
See below for the full list of winners. For details on each vehicle, go to iihs.org/ratings.
VNR:
Tues. 2/27/2024,
Transponder 01/Slot C (dl11725.20H) bandwidth 9 MHz; symbol rate 7.5
For more information, go to iihs.org
The
###
2024 TOP SAFETY PICK+ winners earn good ratings in the small overlap front and updated side crash tests, as well as good or acceptable ratings in the updated moderate overlap crash test. They also have standard good- or acceptable-rated headlights and earn good or acceptable ratings in vehicle-to-pedestrian front crash prevention tests.
Small cars
Acura Integra
Mazda 3 hatchback
Mazda 3 sedan
Toyota Prius
Midsize cars
Honda Accord
Hyundai Ioniq 6
Large luxury car
Genesis Electrified G80
Small SUVs
Genesis GV60
Honda HR-V
Hyundai Kona
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-50 (built after
Midsize SUVs
Ford Explorer
Kia Telluride
Mazda CX-90
Nissan Pathfinder (built after
Subaru Ascent
Midsize luxury SUVs
Acura MDX
BMW X3
Genesis GV80 (built after
Mercedes-Benz GLE Class (with optional front crash prevention)
Tesla Model Y
#########
2024 TOP SAFETY PICK winners earn good ratings in the small overlap front, original moderate overlap front, and updated side crash tests. They also have standard good- or acceptable-rated headlights and earn a good or acceptable rating in vehicle-to-pedestrian front crash prevention tests.
Small cars
Hyundai Elantra
Subaru Impreza
Toyota Prius Prime
Midsize Cars
Subaru Outback
Toyota Camry
Large Car
Toyota Crown
Midsize luxury cars
BMW 5 series
Large luxury cars
Genesis G80
Genesis G90
Small SUVs
BMW X1
Honda CR-V
Hyundai Ioniq 5
Hyundai Tucson
Kia Sportage
Lexus UX
Lexus RZ
Subaru Solterra
Midsize SUVs
Honda Pilot
Hyundai Palisade
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Jeep Grand Cherokee L
Mazda CX-90 PHEV
Toyota Highlander
Volkswagen Atlas
Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport
Large SUVs
Audi Q7
Audi Q8 e-tron
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron
Rivian R1S
Midsize luxury SUVs
Acura RDX
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Genesis Electrified GV70
Genesis GV70 (built after
Infiniti QX60
Lexus NX
Lexus NX Plug-in Hybrid
Lexus RX
Mercedes-Benz GLC
Volvo XC90
Volvo XC90 Recharge
Minivans
Honda Odyssey
Toyota Sienna
Small pickup
Hyundai Santa Cruz
Large pickups
Rivian R1T crew cab
Toyota Tundra crew cab
Toyota Tundra extended cab
Joe Young Insurance Institute for Highway Safety 504-641-0491 [email protected]
Source:
New London to pay former risk manager $50,000 to settle suit [The Day, New London, Conn.]
Munich Re surpasses profit target three years in a row
Advisor News
- Social cultivation: How to talk with wealthy prospects
- How important is a written financial plan?
- Coalition wants to advise people impacted by policy changes in new administration
- Diagnosing miscommunication in retirement planning
- Election creates an opportunity for advisor/client dialogue
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
- Generations
- Vermont Dept. of Financial Regulation warns of potential health insurance scams
- Weight loss drugs drives Va. Medicaid costs up
Covering weight loss drugs driving Virginia Medicaid costs higher
- Feds suspend ACA marketplace access to companies accused of falsely promising ‘cash cards’
- Spending on new weight loss drugs triples
Virginia Medicaid spending on new weight loss drugs triples
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News