Health care providers say changes put 'poorest of poor' at-risk
Behavioral health providers across
In expanding Medicare's coverage to some behavioral health services like licensed independent mental health practitioners, providers say the reimbursements they were receiving through
That has produced a 50% loss in payments for individuals that qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid — so-called "dual eligible" individuals — resulting in losses of thousands of dollars to providers across the state.
In turn, those providers have been forced to reduce the number of times they see dual eligible patients, put those individuals on waiting lists or cut off services to them altogether.
"Especially for our rural providers, this is a hit to their finances, which is causing many to reevaluate how they will be able to continue serving this population," said
Many of the providers struggling most are working in rural areas of
The problem with how providers are able to be reimbursed was identified more than a year ago, Dubas said, although federal officials chalked it up to "unintended consequences."
Beginning in
But in
Nebraskans who were "dual eligible" — those over the age of 65 or with a qualifying disability who are also low income found their reimbursements for behavioral health services were roughly half of what they were before.
For example, before the federal change took effect on
Since
Taken together, the provider is paid a total of
The change in how behavioral health services were reimbursed for dual eligible Nebraskans came as a shock to
After continuing to bill Nebraska Medicaid for services rendered to dual eligible patients, Price said she learned through a
Medicaid demanded Price repay nearly
"I worked really hard to get credentialed with Medicare, and as soon as I was able to get credentials, I tried to rebill all of those claims," Price explained, "but they did not get repaid."
To compound matters, Price said Inspirit Counseling had to make difficult decisions about the 30-35 patients who were dual eligible. Some providers decided to keep seeing patients on a pro bono basis, while others had to terminate their patients' treatment.


Public Enemies: Health Insurers and Tax Collectors
Mangione timeline: How a Maryland man was arrested in connection to health insurance CEO’s killing
Advisor News
- U.S. debt hits $40 trillion: how to support concerned clients
- Flourish brings private-bank-like cash solution to MassMutual’s network
- Majority of Americans concerned recent market highs are unsustainable
- GLP-1 users choose between medication and retirement saving
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Corebridge Financial Introduces Progressive Trigger, a First-of-Its-Kind Index Annuity Strategy Designed to Turn Missed Years into Future Opportunity
- Insurer proposes $1.1M deal to resolve CA teachers’ annuity fee lawsuit
- IMOs get frustrated with slow carrier adoption of faster technology
- New class-action lawsuit targets Delaware Life over annuity disclosures
- A client remarried: Does their annuity still fit?
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News