December interest rate cut was a close call for some Fed officials, minutes show
At their
The minutes underscored the deep split on the 19-member policymaking committee over what constitutes the biggest threat to the economy: weak hiring or stubbornly-elevated inflation. If a sluggish job market is the biggest threat, then the Fed would typically cut rates more. But if still-high inflation is the bigger problem, then the Fed would keep rates elevated, or even raise them. Just 12 of the 19 members vote on rate decisions, though all participate in discussions.
The minutes showed that even some Fed officials who supported the rate cut did so with reservations. Some Fed officials wanted to wait for more economic data before making any further moves, the minutes said. Key economic data on jobs, inflation, and growth were delayed by the six-week government shutdown, leaving Fed officials with only outdated information at their meeting earlier this month.
The minutes don't identify specific officials. But how they vote is public, and two policymakers dissented in favor of keeping rates unchanged:
The third dissent was from Fed governor
When the Fed reduces its key rate, over time it can lower borrowing costs for homes, cars, and credit cards, though market forces also affect those rates.
At its December meeting, the Fed also released quarterly economic projections, which also showed the extent of the divisions on the Fed committee. Seven officials projected no cuts in 2026, while eight forecast two or more reductions. Four supported just one cut.
A weaker job market would likely spur the Fed to reduce borrowing costs more quickly. Two weeks ago, the government reported that employers had cut about 40,000 jobs in October and November, while the unemployment rate rose to 4.6%, a four-year high.
Inflation, meanwhile, remains above the Fed’s 2% target, complicating the central bank’s next moves. In November, annual inflation cooled to 2.7%, down from 3% in September, but last month's data were likely distorted by the shutdown, economists said, which forced the government to estimate many price changes rather than measuring them directly.
“It’s a labor market that seems to have significant downside risks,”


Could NJ get a new nuclear power plant? It might take a while.
Nasdaq, Dow Jones flat as Fed minutes show division over December rate cut
Advisor News
- Can your advisory firm survive without you?
- I started using AI, but what now?
- How to support an entrepreneur client with multiple businesses
- Could a narrower focus help grow your practice?
- U.S. debt hits $40 trillion: how to support concerned clients
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- MassMutual Expands Lending Options With New Secured Credit Line
- Corebridge Financial Introduces Progressive Trigger, a First-of-Its-Kind Index Annuity Strategy Designed to Turn Missed Years into Future Opportunity
- Insurer proposes $1.1M deal to resolve CA teachers’ annuity fee lawsuit
- IMOs get frustrated with slow carrier adoption of faster technology
- New class-action lawsuit targets Delaware Life over annuity disclosures
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Benefit sustainability, affordability challenge employers
- Transparent Medicare Advantage guidance: Putting consumers first
- Legislators hear report on thin hospital margins, advance prior authorization reform
- Hawthorne School Budget Faces New Pressure As Health Insurance Costs Jump Nearly 34%
- Half the Coverage: What the TLC's Rideshare Insurance Cut Means for Queens Riders
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News