December interest rate cut was a close call for some Fed officials, minutes show
At their
The minutes underscored the deep split on the 19-member policymaking committee over what constitutes the biggest threat to the economy: weak hiring or stubbornly-elevated inflation. If a sluggish job market is the biggest threat, then the Fed would typically cut rates more. But if still-high inflation is the bigger problem, then the Fed would keep rates elevated, or even raise them. Just 12 of the 19 members vote on rate decisions, though all participate in discussions.
The minutes showed that even some Fed officials who supported the rate cut did so with reservations. Some Fed officials wanted to wait for more economic data before making any further moves, the minutes said. Key economic data on jobs, inflation, and growth were delayed by the six-week government shutdown, leaving Fed officials with only outdated information at their meeting earlier this month.
The minutes don't identify specific officials. But how they vote is public, and two policymakers dissented in favor of keeping rates unchanged:
The third dissent was from Fed governor
When the Fed reduces its key rate, over time it can lower borrowing costs for homes, cars, and credit cards, though market forces also affect those rates.
At its December meeting, the Fed also released quarterly economic projections, which also showed the extent of the divisions on the Fed committee. Seven officials projected no cuts in 2026, while eight forecast two or more reductions. Four supported just one cut.
A weaker job market would likely spur the Fed to reduce borrowing costs more quickly. Two weeks ago, the government reported that employers had cut about 40,000 jobs in October and November, while the unemployment rate rose to 4.6%, a four-year high.
Inflation, meanwhile, remains above the Fed’s 2% target, complicating the central bank’s next moves. In November, annual inflation cooled to 2.7%, down from 3% in September, but last month's data were likely distorted by the shutdown, economists said, which forced the government to estimate many price changes rather than measuring them directly.
“It’s a labor market that seems to have significant downside risks,”


Could NJ get a new nuclear power plant? It might take a while.
Nasdaq, Dow Jones flat as Fed minutes show division over December rate cut
Advisor News
- Semi-retirement: helping clients balance flexibility with financial security
- The 6X Formula for leveraging content marketing with AI
- When a home becomes difficult to insure, the plan changes
- The inheritance gap: Helping clients plan for money that hasn’t arrived
- After the midterms: Addressing your clients’ tax concerns
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Athene CEO criticizes offshore reinsurance, risk-taking by competitors
- DOL, trade groups, state AGs file briefs supporting Alcoa in PRT lawsuit
- John Hancock launches new fixed indexed annuity suite
- Annuities to play a larger role in workplace retirement plans
- FHLBank Pittsburgh Announces Results in 2026 Board Election
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- A 'critical service': Senior centers help local residents navigate complexities of Medicare coverage
- Cost of employer-sponsored health insurance plans rises again, nonpartisan survey finds
- Sen. Baldwin proposes lowering Medicare eligibility age to 50
- SENS. OSSOFF CONTINUING PUSH TO BAN HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES FROM DENYING OR DELAYING NEEDED HEALTH CARE
- Reed: Can this father be appointed child's guardian?
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Fubon Insurance Vietnam Co., Ltd.
- Three lawsuits put life insurers’ cost-of-insurance practices under scrutiny
- Military Briefs: November 12-18
- Security Benefit Series B Preferred Stock Dividend Rate Resets to 10.286%
- FHLBank Pittsburgh Announces Results in 2026 Board Election
More Life Insurance News