Conn. can halt Diamantis' pension, but can't revoke his health insurance
As paymaster and healthcare administrator for state employees and retirees, Connecticut Comptroller
"No one who has been convicted of defrauding the taxpayers and is now fleeing justice should continue receiving a pension," Scanlon said in a news release the morning Diamantis' lawyer told a judge he had fled to
But what about that health plan? Diamantis, a former seven-term state legislator and later deputy state budget chief, had earned the state's coveted, gold-plated medical coverage in 20 years of service. That fact did not escape Scanlon in his role as the healthcare overseer. He turned his attention to it that same day.
Could the state revoke Diamantis' healthcare coverage? Certainly it could go after his
A federal jury in
After some discussion, the answer came clear this week: Nope.
"I don't have the authority. There is no statute that is similar to the revocation on the healthcare," Scanlon told me late Wednesday.
No state agency can do it, including the attorney general, who has the authority to bring lawsuits to yank pension payments from convicted former state officials. Ultimately, a judge must decide on the pension cases, as we expect will happen with the
"I think it's a gap and something we should take a look at to have the standards be matching," Scanlon said, referring to health coverage. "I don't know that it makes a ton of sense to have a law that says we're going to take away the pension of somebody that commits public crimes but we're going to let them keep their health insurance."
He added, "It's certainly something that I'm going to be having conversations about with people in the legislature heading into the next session."
It's safe to assume lawmakers will craft a proposal of some sort, and debate it. But whether a law would revoke Diamantis' health coverage retroactively would clearly depend on how it's written.
Health insurance, which can be worth tens of thousands of dollars a year to a family, presents sticky problems that Scanlon recognized on that first day when Diamantis' lawyer,
"One thing that's uniquely American is, we don't punish people for the sins of their fathers," Scanlon said to me. "I have a tough time thinking about removing healthcare from people's children, as a dad."
On the other hand, dependents do lose coverage if a retired state or municipal employee dies, under the rules of the state health plans. Scanlon, in fact, worked on a bill to address family coverage for cops, and later firefighters and medical first responders, killed in the line of duty.
The "
"This came out of the wake of the tragedy in
"Kids and wives of killed police officers are who should be getting this plan, not the children of convicted criminals," Scanlon said.
The bill allowing the state to seek to revoke pensions was years in the making and clearly, an extension to include health coverage would require long discussions. Could it, for example, revoke coverage for the convicted person but not his or her dependants?
For now, Diamantis, whose given name is Konstantinos, remains covered under an
He told me in a phone interview
Last week, Diamantis, through Pattis, filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking to stop Scanlon and Attorney General
Scanlon used his authority not to withhold payment, he told me, but to cut a check and hold it in his office rather than sending it to Diamantis' bank for deposit. "He can come get it anytime he wants," Scanlon said.
Tong did not file a lawsuit to revoke the pension but said in a written statement, "State law requires that my office take action to revoke or reduce the pension of state or municipal officials convicted of corruption-related charges. We are reviewing all legal options to fully enforce the law."
Pattis, in the lawsuit, said Diamantis cannot have his pension revoked yet because a judgment is considered to be entered into the record only after sentencing - which didn't happen after Diamantis failed to appear in court. Tong and Scanlon denied Diamantis due process by not giving him a chance to oppose their actions, the lawsuit said.
It's obvious that revoking health coverage, especially if children and spouses are involved, would be rife with disputes of this sort. But Scanlon said, "This is a conversation that we need to have."
Distributed by Newsbank, inc.


New Jersey shielded from lost ACA coverage
Advisor News
- Your client’s $3 million portfolio doesn’t tell you their insurance needs
- How life insurance can provide liquidity for wealthy families
- Retirement providers turn to digital engagement to retain assets
- Looking out for clients with diminished mental capacity
- House panel advances CLEAR Forms Act backed by IRI
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
- AM Best downgrades A-Cap insurers amid financial and regulatory troubles
- Lawsuit claims Delaware Life hid billions in insurer-linked investments
- AM Best to Deliver Presentation at 2026 ACLI Annual Conference
- Global Atlantic Announces Launch of ForeLifetime Income, a New Fixed Index Annuity
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News