Center on Budget & Policy Priorities: Taking Away Medicaid for Not Meeting Work Requirements Harms Women
Medicaid is a critical source of health coverage for women. Nearly 40 million women get their health coverage through Medicaid, millions of whom became eligible due to the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) expansion of Medicaid to cover more low-income adults. Medicaid offers women essential health care services, including preventive care, family planning, and care for chronic physical and behavioral health conditions.
Now, the
The Administration is allowing states to impose work requirements on adult Medicaid enrollees other than those who are 65 or older, pregnant, or qualify for Medicaid because they receive disability benefits through Supplemental Security Income. In
Women Caring for Children or Other Family Members May Have Trouble Meeting Work Requirements
Many people with caregiving responsibilities will likely struggle to work the required hours every month. Although most women who could be subject to these policies work outside the home, women are more likely than men to be a caregiver to their children or family members. Caregiving responsibilities can make it harder to work outside the home, and even for those who are working, can make it harder to work 80 hours per month every month.
In states that haven't expanded Medicaid, low-income mothers are among the primary targets of policies that would take Medicaid coverage away from adults who aren't working, since they are among the small number of non-elderly adults who are eligible for Medicaid. Most of these states' proposed work requirements would put mothers in a catch-22: if they don't comply, they'll lose coverage, but if they do comply, they'll likely still lose coverage because their income will exceed their state's very low Medicaid eligibility limit. (CMS has not yet approved this policy in a state that did not expand Medicaid, though several states' proposals are pending.)
Even in states that have expanded Medicaid, mothers and other caregivers will be at risk of losing coverage. While some states' work requirement policies exempt parents and caregivers, others exempt only parents of young children and have very limited exemptions for caregivers. Claiming these exemptions can be burdensome for mothers of older or adult children with special health care needs, who will have to prove that their child's disability or special health care needs qualify. That will add one more burden for parents who already face major challenges and could compromise care for their children.
Women Will Also Lose Coverage for Other Reasons
Working women will also be at risk of losing coverage. Many working women enrolled in Medicaid are employed in industries where both employment and hours are volatile. Many workers in these industries report that their hours vary significantly from week to week. These jobs also feature little flexibility: any illness, family emergency, or child care or transportation disruption can lead to workers losing their jobs and experiencing gaps in employment.
Reflecting these realities of the low-wage job market, 51 percent of low-income working women potentially subject to Medicaid work requirements could lose coverage for one or more months under an 80-hour-per month work requirement policy like the one that
Women with disabilities and serious illnesses are also at risk of losing coverage. These women could lose coverage if they don't meet the criteria for limited exemptions, don't understand that they qualify for an exemption, or are unable to provide the documentation proving that they qualify. For women who lose health coverage, lack of access to care will make it difficult to then get the documentation they need to prove they should be exempt. And many of the obstacles women face to holding a job -- including caregiving responsibilities and lack of access to child care or transportation -- may also make it difficult for them to overcome the bureaucratic hurdles required to prove they are exempt from these policies. Red tape and paperwork requirements have consistently proved to reduce enrollment in Medicaid, and studies of work requirements in other programs have found that people with disabilities, mental illness, and substance use disorders are disproportionately likely to be sanctioned and lose benefits, even though many should be exempt.
Losing Coverage Will Worsen Women's Access to Care
Women who lose coverage as a result of these policies could face significant harm. Studies have found that Medicaid expansion increased the share of people with a personal physician, the share getting check-ups, and the share getting recommended preventive care such as cholesterol and cancer screenings, and decreased the share delaying care due to cost, skipping medications due to cost, or relying on the emergency room for care. State policies that take away coverage from people not meeting work requirements could reverse a large share of these gains.
Losing access to care would be especially harmful for the nearly half of all women who have an ongoing condition requiring regular monitoring, care, or medication. For example, women are increasingly affected by the opioid crisis: twice as many women died from opioid overdoses in 2016 as in 2007. Taking Medicaid coverage away from women who aren't working could restrict their access to needed substance use disorder treatment and recovery services.
This is part of why groups like the



Sens. Merkley, Wyden, Rep. Walden Push for Emergency Aid for Flood-Stricken Eastern Oregon
Center on Budget & Policy Priorities: Taking Away Medicaid for Not Meeting Work Requirements Harms American Indians, Alaska Natives
Advisor News
- IRS CEO FRANK J. BISIGNANO VISITS OHIO TO TOUT WORKING FAMILIES TAX CUTS PROVISIONS ON NO TAX ON CAR LOAN INTEREST, NO TAX ON OVERTIME, ENHANCED DEDUCTION FOR SENIOR CITIZENS
- The hidden flaw in insurance AI adoption for advisors and carriers
- Rising healthcare costs impact 401(k) accounts
- What advisors think about pooled employer plans, alternative investments
- AI, stablecoins and private market expansion may reshape financial services by 2030
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- How annuities can help protect retirees from financial scams
- MetLife Inc. (NYSE: MET) Climbs to New 52-Week High
- The Standard and Pacific Guardian Life Announce Entry into Agreement to Transition Individual Annuities Business
- AuguStar Retirement launches StarStream Variable Annuity
- Prismic Life Announces Completion of Oversubscribed Capital Raise
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Bay Area braces for Trump’s tougher CalFresh rules
- Mom blames Florida Blue, Broward Health dispute for daughter’s $11,500 ER bill
- ASHLEY HINSON FAILS TO FOOL IOWANS WITH HER MISLEADING SENATE CAMPAIGN TV AD
- NEW: "ASHLEY HINSON AD MISLEADS VOTERS ABOUT HER RECORD"
- Idaho farmers can band together to buy cheaper health insurance through Farm Bureau deal
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Judge sends Greg Lindberg back to federal prison for fraud, bribery
- Kansas official running for governor received $300K in donations before key decision
- Investigators say C.R. man's life insurance claims for 3 children were fraudulent
- Shocking death of Kyle Busch renews debate over IUL plan
- WoodmenLife launches final expense life insurance offering
More Life Insurance News