Abortion coverage is limited or unavailable at a quarter of large workplaces
About a quarter of large
The findings demonstrate another realm, beyond state laws, in which access to abortion care varies widely across America since the Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion last year in Dobbs v.
More than ever, where someone works and the constraints of their health insurance can determine whether an abortion is possible. Workers without coverage are left to pay out-of-pocket for abortion care and related costs.
In 2021, the median costs for people paying out-of-pocket in the first trimester were
KFF's 2023 annual survey found that 10% of large employers — defined as those with at least 200 workers — don't cover legal abortion care under their largest job-based health plan. An additional 18% said legal abortions are covered only in limited circumstances, such as when a pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, or endangers a person's life or health.
The share of employers that said they don't cover abortion under any circumstances "is bigger than I would have expected," said
So far, 14 states, mostly in the South and Midwest, have enacted near-total abortion bans, and an additional seven states have instituted gestational limits between six and 18 weeks. Abortion is legal in 24 states and the
Sharply divergent state abortion laws solidified in the aftermath of the Dobbs decision compound the complexity for employers with workers across multiple states, Rae said. Many large companies employ people in places with vastly different abortion policies, and their health benefits are more likely to cover dependents who may live elsewhere.
"Those dependents can be college kids — and college kids can be anywhere — or any other type of dependent who could just spread out over an area much larger than where you just have actual physical establishments," Rae said.
The KFF survey found that about a third of large companies said they cover legal abortions in most or all circumstances; the largest companies, with at least 5,000 employees, were more likely to offer the benefit compared with smaller firms. An additional 40% said they were unsure of their coverage — perhaps because employer policies are in flux, Rae said.
Employer health plans' treatment of abortion has changed little since the Dobbs decision, the survey found. Among companies that said they did not cover legally provided abortion services or covered them in limited circumstances, 3% reduced or eliminated abortion coverage. By contrast, of the large companies that generally covered abortion, 12% added or significantly expanded coverage.
That's in sharp contrast to the rapidly changing laws governing abortion access in the states. It's unclear whether workers at companies that don't cover abortion or heavily restrict coverage are located primarily in states that have outlawed the procedure.
The KFF survey includes information from more than 2,100 large and small companies on their health benefits and the related costs for workers. Annual premiums for family coverage rose 7% on average this year, to
One tactic employers use is to provide separate benefits for abortion-related expenses. In response to increasingly restrictive state abortion laws and the
However, the KFF survey found that a small share of large employers said they provide or plan to provide workers with financial help to cover abortion-related travel expenses. Companies with at least 5,000 workers are the most likely to provide that assistance. Overall, 7% of large employers said they provide or plan to provide financial assistance to employees who must travel out of state for abortion care.
According to the
Recent research published by job-search firm Indeed, the
However, job satisfaction among existing employees also dropped at those companies, with ratings of senior management dropping "8%, driven by workers in typically male-dominated jobs," they wrote, "illustrating both the potential perks and pitfalls for companies that choose to wade into contentious political waters."



October 23, 2023 | Investor relations
'The little clinic on wheels'
Advisor News
- Economic pressure makes boomerang living a new normal
- Millennials ready to bring their advisor to the family table
- The gap between policy awareness and investor conversations
- Younger investors turn to ‘finfluencers’
- Using digital retirement modeling to strengthen client understanding
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- A new opportunity for advisors: Younger indexed annuity buyers
- Most employers support embedding guaranteed lifetime income options into DC Plans
- InspereX Partners with AuguStar Retirement for Strategic Expansion into Annuity Market
- FACC and DOL enter stipulation to dismiss 2020 guidance lawsuit
- Zinnia’s Zahara policy admin system adds FIA chassis to product library
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Humana Reports First Quarter 2026 Financial Results; Affirms Full Year 2026 Adjusted Financial Guidance
- BILL TO EXPAND PREVENTIVE HEALTHCARE COVERAGE AND SAVE LIVES PASSES SENATE
- ‘No gap’ private health insurance can save you money. But there’s a catch
- Researchers from New York University (NYU) Langone Health Provide Details of New Studies and Findings in the Area of Radius Fracture (Investigating the Impact of Health Insurance on the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in New York State): Radius Fracture
- Insurance Commissioner working to provide short-term health policy options to Mississippians
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Are you truly independent? 5 questions to ask
- NCOIL tackles packed agenda at spring meeting
- Unum Group Reports First Quarter 2026 Results
- Foresters Financial revamps accelerated underwriting, raises limits to $2M
- National Life Group Appoints Matthew Frazee as Chief Financial Officer to Support Continued Organizational Growth
More Life Insurance News