NAVIGATORS GROUP INC – 10-Q – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
| Edgar Online, Inc. |
NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forThe Navigators Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("the Company", "we", "us", and "our") are "forward-looking statements" as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report are forward-looking statements. Whenever used in this report, the words "estimate," "expect," "believe" or similar expressions or their negative are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are derived from information that we currently have and assumptions that we make. We cannot assure that anticipated results will be achieved, since actual results may differ materially because of both known and unknown risks and uncertainties which we face. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors discussed in the "Risk Factors" section of our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as:
• continued volatility in the financial markets and the current recession;
• risks arising from the concentration of our business in marine and energy,
general liability and professional liability insurance, including the risk
that market conditions for these lines could change adversely or that we
could experience large losses in these lines;
• cyclicality in the property and casualty insurance business generally, and
the marine insurance business specifically; • risks that we face in entering new markets and diversifying the products
and services that we offer, including risks arising from the development
of our new specialty lines or our ability to manage effectively the rapid
growth in our lines of business;
• changing legal, social and economic trends and inherent uncertainties in
the loss estimation process, which could adversely impact the adequacy of
loss reserves and the allowance for reinsurance recoverables; • risks inherent in the preparation of our financial statements, which
require us to make many estimates and judgments;
• our ability to continue to obtain reinsurance covering our exposures at
appropriate prices and/or in sufficient amounts;
• the counterparty credit risk of our reinsurers, including risks associated
with the collection of reinsurance recoverable amounts from our reinsurers, who may not pay losses in a timely fashion, or at all; • the effects of competition from other insurers;
• unexpected turnover of our professional staff and our ability to attract
and retain qualified employees; • increases in interest rates during periods in which we must sell
fixed-income securities to satisfy liquidity needs may result in realized
investment losses;
• our investment portfolio is exposed to market-wide risks and fluctuations,
as well as to risks inherent in particular types of securities; • exposure to significant capital market risks related to changes in interest rates, credit spreads, equity prices and foreign exchange rates
which may adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition
or cash flows;
• capital may not be available in the future, or may not be available on
favorable terms;
• our ability to maintain or improve our insurance company ratings, as
downgrades could significantly adversely affect us, including reducing our
competitive position in the industry, or causing clients to choose an insurer with a certain rating level to use higher-rated insurers; 27
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
• risks associated with continued or increased premium levies by Lloyd's of
London ("Lloyd's) for the Lloyd's Central Fund and cash calls for trust fund deposits, or a significant downgrade of Lloyd's rating by the A.M. Best Company ("A.M. Best");
• changes in the laws, rules and regulations that apply to our insurance
companies; • the effect of the European Union Directive on Solvency II on how we manage
our business, capital requirements and costs associated with conducting
business, including the impact of the delay in the implementation of Solvency II;
• the inability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us in sufficient
amounts, which would harm our ability to meet our obligations; • weather-related events and other catastrophes (including man-made
catastrophes) impacting our insureds and/or reinsurers; • volatility in the market price of our common stock;
• exposure to recent uncertainties with regard to European sovereign debt
holdings; • the determination of the impairments taken on our investments is subjective and could materially impact our financial position or results of operations; • if we experience difficulties with our information technology and telecommunications systems and/or data security, our ability to conduct our business might be adversely affected; • compliance by our Marine business with the legal and regulatory
requirements to which they are subject is evolving and unpredictable. In
addition, compliance with new sanctions and embargo laws could have a
material adverse effect on our business; and • other risks that we identify in current and future filings with the
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, any forward-looking events discussed in this Form 10-Q may not occur. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their respective dates. OVERVIEW The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations contained herein should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes which appear elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. It contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please refer to "Note on Forward-Looking Statements" for more information. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed below and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. We are an international insurance company focusing on specialty products within the overall property and casualty insurance market. Our largest product line and most long-standing area of specialization is ocean marine insurance. We have also developed other specialty insurance lines such as commercial primary and excess liability as well as specialty niches in professional liability, and have expanded our specialty reinsurance business since launching Navigators Re in the fourth quarter of 2010. We conduct operations through our Insurance Companies and our Lloyd's Operations segments. The Insurance Companies segment consists ofNavigators Insurance Company , which includes aUnited Kingdom Branch (the "U.K. Branch"), andNavigators Specialty Insurance Company , which underwrites specialty and professional liability insurance on an excess and surplus lines basis. All of the insurance business written byNavigators Specialty Insurance Company is fully reinsured byNavigators Insurance Company pursuant to a 100% quota share reinsurance agreement. The insurance and reinsurance business written by our Insurance Companies is underwritten through our wholly-owned underwriting management Companies,Navigators Management Company, Inc. ("NMC") andNavigators Management (UK) Ltd. ("NMUK"). 28
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Our Lloyd's Operations segment includesNavigators Underwriting Agency Ltd. ("NUAL"), a Lloyd's of London ("Lloyd's") underwriting agency which manages Lloyd's Syndicate 1221 ("Syndicate 1221"). Our Lloyd's Operations primarily underwrite marine and related lines of business along with offshore energy, professional liability insurance and construction coverages for onshore energy business at Lloyd's through Syndicate 1221. We controlled 100% of Syndicate 1221's stamp capacity for the 2013 and 2012 underwriting years through our wholly-owned subsidiary,Navigators Corporate Underwriters Ltd. ("NCUL"), which is referred to as a corporate name in the Lloyd's market. We have also established underwriting agencies inAntwerp, Belgium ,Stockholm, Sweden , andCopenhagen, Denmark , which underwrite risks pursuant to binding authorities with NUAL into Syndicate 1221. We have also established a presence inBrazil andChina through contractual arrangements with local affiliates of Lloyd's.
Catastrophe Risk Management
We have exposure to losses caused by hurricanes, earthquakes, and other natural and man-made catastrophic events. The frequency and severity of catastrophic events is unpredictable. Our Insurance Companies and Lloyd's Operations have exposure to losses caused by natural and man-made catastrophic events. The frequency and severity of catastrophes are unpredictable. The extent of losses from a catastrophe is a function of both the total amount of insured exposure in an area affected by the event and the severity of the event. We continually assess our concentration of underwriting exposures in catastrophe exposed areas globally and manage this exposure through individual risk selection and through the purchase of reinsurance. We also use modeling and concentration management tools that allow us to better monitor and control our accumulations of potential losses from catastrophe events. Despite these efforts, there remains uncertainty about the characteristics, timing and extent of insured losses given the unpredictable nature of catastrophes. The occurrence of one or more catastrophic events could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity. We have significant natural catastrophe exposures throughout the world. We estimate that our largest exposure to loss from a single natural catastrophe event comes from an earthquake on the west coast ofthe United States . As ofMarch 31, 2013 , we estimate that our probable maximum pre-tax gross and net loss exposure from such an earthquake event would be approximately$159 million and$36 million , respectively, including the cost of reinsurance reinstatement premiums ("RRPs"). Like all catastrophe exposure estimates, the foregoing estimate of our probable maximum loss is inherently uncertain. This estimate is highly dependent upon numerous assumptions and subjective underwriting judgments. Examples of significant assumptions and judgments related to such an estimate include the intensity, depth and location of the earthquake, the various types of the insured risks exposed to the event at the time the event occurs and the estimated costs or damages incurred for each insured risk. The composition of our portfolio also makes such estimates challenging due to the non-static nature of the exposures covered under our policies in lines of business such as cargo and hull. There can be no assurances that the gross and net loss amounts that we could incur in such an event or in any natural catastrophe event would not be materially higher than the estimates discussed above given the significant uncertainties with respect to such an estimate. Moreover, our portfolio of insured risks changes dynamically over time and there can be no assurance that our probable maximum loss will not change materially over time. The occurrence of large loss events could reduce the reinsurance coverage that is available to us and could weaken the financial condition of our reinsurers, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Although the reinsurance agreements make the reinsurers liable to us to the extent the risk is transferred or ceded to the reinsurer, ceded reinsurance arrangements do not eliminate our obligation to pay claims to our policyholders as we are required to pay the losses if a reinsurer fails to meet its obligations under the reinsurance agreement. Accordingly, we bear credit risk with respect to our reinsurers. Specifically, our reinsurers may not pay claims made by us on a timely basis, or they may not pay some or all of these claims. Either of these events would increase our costs and could have a material adverse effect on our business. 29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2012 discloses our critical accounting estimates (refer to Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Estimates). Certain of these estimates are critical to the portrayal of our financial condition and results since they require management to establish estimates based on complex and subjective judgments, including those related to our estimates for losses and loss adjustment expenses ("LAE") (including losses that have occurred but were not reported to us by the financial reporting date), reinsurance recoverables, written and unearned premium, the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the impairment of investment securities and accounting for Lloyd's results. For additional information regarding our critical accounting estimates, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2012 .
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Refer to Note 2, Recent Accounting Pronouncements, in the Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for a discussion about accounting standards recently adopted by the Company, as well as recent accounting developments relating to standards not yet adopted by the Company.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is a discussion and analysis of our consolidated and segment results of operations for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012. Our financial results are presented on the basis of U.S. GAAP. However, in presenting our financial results, we discuss our performance with reference to operating earnings, book value per share, underwriting profit or loss, and the combined ratio, all of which are non-GAAP financial measures of performance and/or underwriting profitability. Operating earnings is calculated as net income less after-tax net realized gains (losses) and net other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") losses recognized in earnings. Book value per share is calculated by dividing stockholders' equity by the number of outstanding shares at any period end. Underwriting profit or loss is calculated from net earned premiums, less the sum of net losses and LAE, commission expenses, other operating expenses and other income (expense). The combined ratio is derived by dividing the sum of net losses and LAE, commission expenses, other operating expenses and other income (expense) by net earned premiums. A combined ratio of less than 100% indicates an underwriting profit and greater than 100% indicates an underwriting loss. We consider such measures, which may be defined differently by other companies, to be important in the understanding of our overall results of operations by highlighting the underlying profitability of our insurance business.
Summary of Consolidated Results
The following table presents a summary of our consolidated financial results for the three months ended
Percentage Three Months Ended March 31, Change In thousands, except for per share amounts 2013 2012 2013 vs. 2012 Gross written premiums$ 393,222 $ 343,149 14.6 % Net written premiums 269,452 243,045 10.9 % Total revenues 221,375 196,976 12.4 % Total expenses 200,822 185,791 8.1 % Pre-tax income (loss)$ 20,553 $ 11,185 83.8 % Provision (benefit) for income taxes 6,643 3,281 102.5 % Net income (loss)$ 13,910 $ 7,904 76.0 % Net income (loss) per common share: Basic $ 0.99 $ 0.57 Diluted $ 0.97 $ 0.56 30
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Net income for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 was$13.9 million or$0.97 per diluted share compared to$7.9 million or$0.56 per diluted share for the three months endedMarch 31, 2012 . Operating earnings for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 were$10.8 million or$0.75 per diluted share compared to$6.8 million or$0.48 per diluted share for the comparable period in 2012. In comparison to net income, operating earnings excludes after-tax net realized gains of$3.1 million and after-tax other-than-temporary impairment losses of$0.03 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 . For the three months endedMarch 31, 2012 , operating earnings excluded$1.2 million of net realized gains and after-tax other-than-temporary impairment losses of$0.1 million . The increase in our operating earnings was largely attributable an increase in net investment income and stronger underwriting results. Our book value per share as ofMarch 31, 2013 was$63.46 , increasing from$62.61 as ofDecember 31, 2012 . The increase in book value per share primarily resulted from our results of operations. Our consolidated stockholders' equity increased 2.0% to$896.8 million as ofMarch 31, 2013 compared to$879.5 million as ofDecember 31, 2012 . Cash flow provided by operations was$4.3 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to$16.4 million for the comparable period in 2012. The decrease in cash flow from operations was due to the timing of payments to our reinsurers in connection with the increased use of proportional reinsurance to support our offshore energy business in 2013. 31
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table presents our consolidated underwriting results and provides a reconciliation of our underwriting profit or loss to GAAP net income or net loss for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012: Percentage Three Months Ended March 31, Change In thousands 2013 2012 2013 vs. 2012 Gross written premiums$ 393,222 $
343,149 14.6 % Net written premiums 269,452 243,045 10.9 % Net earned premiums 202,328 183,119 10.5 % Net losses and loss adjustment expenses (131,342 ) (117,985 ) 11.3 % Commission expenses (26,555 ) (29,450 ) -9.8 % Other operating expenses (40,874 ) (36,307 ) 12.6 % Other income (expenses) (1) 618 911 -32.1 % Underwriting profit (loss)$ 4,175 $ 288 NM Net investment income 13,657 11,258 21.3 % Net other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in earnings (42 ) (154 ) -72.7 % Net realized gains (losses) 4,814 1,842 NM Interest expense (2,051 ) (2,049 ) 0.1 %
Income (loss) before income taxes
83.8 % Income tax expense (benefit) 6,643 3,281 102.5 % Net income (loss)$ 13,910 $ 7,904 76.0 % Losses and loss adjustment expenses ratio 64.9 % 64.4 % Commission expense ratio 13.1 % 16.1 % Other operating expense ratio (2) 19.9 % 19.3 % Combined ratio 97.9 % 99.8 %
(1) - Reported within "Other income (expense)" on the Consolidated Statements of
Income
(2) - Includes Other operating expenses & Other income (expense)
NM - Percentage change not meaningful
The combined ratio for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 was 97.9% compared to 99.8% for the same period in 2012. Our pre-tax underwriting profit increased$3.9 million to$4.2 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to a$0.3 million for the same period in 2012. Our pre-tax underwriting results for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 include$4.4 million of underwriting profit from our Excess Casualty and Primary Casualty businesses due in part to strong production attributable to the expansion of those underwriting teams and the continued dislocation of certain competitors, as well as$4.0 million of underwriting profit from our Lloyd's Operations due to continued favorable loss emergence for underwriting years 2011 and prior. We also recorded net prior period reserve deficiencies of$6.7 million from our Insurance Companies Professional Liability business. Our underwriting profit for the three months endedMarch 31, 2012 reflects a net loss of$6.5 million related to the grounding of the cruise ship,Costa Concordia . This loss was offset by net prior period reserve redundancies of$6.9 million primarily related to our Property Casualty business. 32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents Revenues Gross Written Premiums The following tables set forth our gross written premiums, net written premiums and net earned premiums by segment and line of business for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012: Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 2012 Gross Net Net Gross Net Net Written Written Earned Written Written Earned In thousands Premiums % Premiums Premiums Premiums % Premiums Premiums Insurance Companies: Marine$ 50,847 13 %$ 41,141 $ 36,725 $ 61,865 18 %$ 42,865 $ 35,275 Property Casualty 218,964 56 % 149,951 92,718 155,919 45 % 114,532 74,368 Professional Liability 31,817 8 % 25,227 24,888 30,554 9 % 23,853 21,905 Insurance Companies Total$ 301,628 77 %$ 216,319 $ 154,331 $ 248,338 72 %$ 181,250 $ 131,548 Lloyd's Operations: Marine$ 53,644 14 %$ 39,558 $ 34,045 $ 61,775 18 %$ 48,058 $ 33,264 Property Casualty 25,058 6 % 7,312 7,879 24,296 7 % 9,355 14,502 Professional Liability 12,892 3 % 6,263 6,073 8,740 3 % 4,382 3,805 Lloyd's Operations Total$ 91,594 23 %$ 53,133 $ 47,997 $ 94,811 28 %$ 61,795 $ 51,571 Total$ 393,222 100 %$ 269,452 $ 202,328 $ 343,149 100 %$ 243,045 $ 183,119 Gross written premiums increased$50.1 million , or 14.6%, to$393.2 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to$343.1 million for the same period in 2012. The increases in gross written premiums are primarily attributed to growth within our Property Casualty business, specifically our Excess Casualty division as a result of strong production attributable to an expansion of our underwriting teams and continued dislocation among certain competitors, as well as our Assumed Reinsurance division, as our Navigators Reinsurance ("NavRe") business continues to achieve successful growth since its establishment in late 2010. Average renewal premium rates for our Insurance Companies segment increased for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 across substantially all of our businesses within each segment. Our Insurance Companies Marine business has realized a 4.0% and 3.0% increase in rates for the Marine Liability and Inland Marine divisions, respectively. Within our Insurance Companies Property Casualty business we have realized a 1.8% increase in rates for the Excess Casualty division, a 1.4% increase in the Primary Casualty division, and a slight 0.3% decrease from our Energy & Engineering division. Our Insurance Companies Professional Liability business has experienced an overall increase in its renewal rates of 6.1%, consisting of 13.2% and 3.8% for the Management Liability ("D&O") and Errors & Omissions ("E&O") divisions, respectively. For the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 , average renewal premium rates for our Lloyd's Operations segment include increases for Lloyd's Marine and Lloyd's Energy & Engineering of approximately 5.0% and 1.6%, respectively. Our Lloyd's Professional Liability business experienced an average decrease of 4.5%. The average premium rate increases or decreases as noted above for the Marine, Property Casualty and Professional Liability businesses are calculated primarily by comparing premium amounts on policies that have renewed. The premiums are adjusted for changes in exposures and sometimes represent an aggregation of several lines of business. The rate change calculations provide an indicated pricing trend and are not meant to be a precise analysis of the numerous factors that affect premium rates or the adequacy of such rates to cover all underwriting costs and generate an underwriting profit. The calculation can also be affected quarter by quarter depending on the particular policies and the number of policies that renew during that period. Due to market conditions, these rate changes may or may not apply to new business that generally would be more competitively priced compared to renewal business. The calculation does not reflect the rate on business that we are unwilling or unable to renew due to loss experience or competition. 33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Ceded Written Premiums
In the ordinary course of business, we reinsure certain insurance risks with unaffiliated insurance companies for the purpose of limiting our maximum loss exposure, protecting against catastrophic losses and maintaining desired ratios of net premiums written to statutory surplus. The relationship of ceded to gross written premium varies based upon the types of business written and whether the business is written by the Insurance Companies or the Lloyd's Operations. Our reinsurance program includes contracts for proportional reinsurance, per risk and whole account excess-of-loss reinsurance for both property and casualty risks and property catastrophe excess-of-loss reinsurance. In recent years we have increased our utilization of excess-of-loss reinsurance for marine, property and certain casualty risks. Our excess-of-loss reinsurance contracts generally provide for a specific amount of coverage in excess of an attachment point and sometimes provides for reinstatement of the coverage to the extent the limit has been exhausted for payment of additional reinsurance premium (referred to as RRPs). The number of reinsurance reinstatements available varies by contract.
We record an estimate of the expected RRPs for losses ceded to excess-of-loss agreements where this feature applies.
For the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 , we incurred approximately$0.7 million in RRPs primarily driven by a large energy loss from our Lloyd'sNavTech business. In comparison to the same period in 2012, we incurred approximately$12 million in RRPs,$6.5 million of which were attributable to losses related to the grounding of the cruise ship,Costa Concordia .
The following table sets forth our ceded written premiums by segment and major line of business for the three months ended
Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 2012 % of % of Ceded Gross Ceded Gross Written Written Written Written In thousands Premiums Premiums Premiums Premiums Insurance Companies: Marine$ 9,706 19 %$ 19,000 31 % Property Casualty 69,013 32 % 41,387 27 % Professional Liability 6,590 21 % 6,701 22 % Total Insurance Companies$ 85,309 28 %$ 67,088 27 % Lloyd's Operations: Marine$ 14,086 26 %$ 13,717 22 % Property Casualty 17,746 71 % 14,941 61 % Professional Liability 6,629 51 % 4,358 50 % Total Lloyd's Operations$ 38,461 42 %$ 33,016 35 % Total$ 123,770 31 %$ 100,104 29 % Overall, the increase in the percentage of total ceded written premiums to total gross written premiums for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily due to changes in the mix of our Property Casualty business, partially offset by approximately$12 million of RRPs in 2012 primarily from our Marine business, which include those related to losses fromCosta Concordia , as described above. The increase in the Property Casualty business for the Insurance Companies is primarily driven by the significant growth from our Excess Casualty division, where our retention is lower, and is partially offset by the continued growth of our Assumed Reinsurance business where our retention is higher. The increase in the Property Casualty business for the Lloyd's Operations is driven by increased use of proportional reinsurance to support our offshore energy business for 2013. 34
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Net Written Premiums
Net written premiums increased 10.9% for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. The increase is due to the mix of our Property Casualty business and is specifically driven by the continued growth in our Assumed Reinsurance business written by NavRe. In addition, the increase is also attributable to the approximate$12 million of RRPs that were incurred in 2012, as described above, offset by higher proportional reinsurance premium cessions on our offshore energy business written byNavTech .
Net Earned Premiums
Net earned premiums increased 10.5% for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 driven by growth of our Assumed Reinsurance business, which includes the Accident & Health ("A&H") lines that are recognized in earnings over a longer exposure period than our other lines of business, as well as earnings from the continued growth of our Excess Casualty and Primary Casualty businesses, as described above. In addition, the increase is also attributable to the RRPs recorded in 2012, as described above.
Net Investment Income
Our net investment income was derived from the following sources:
Percentage Three Months Ended March 31, Change In thousands 2013 2012 2013 vs. 2012 Fixed maturities$ 13,167 $ 15,411 -14.6 % Equity securities 1,030 947 8.8 % Short-term investments 189 312 -39.4 % Total investment income$ 14,386 $ 16,670 -13.7 % Investment expenses (729 ) (5,412 ) -86.5 % Net investment income$ 13,657 $ 11,258 21.3 % The decrease in total investment income before investment expenses was 13.7% for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to lower investment yields. The annualized pre-tax investment yield, excluding net realized gains and losses and net other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") losses recognized in earnings, was 2.3% and 2.0% for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The 2.0% average yield for the three months endedMarch 31, 2012 included$4.5 million of interest expense related to a total$9.2 million settlement of a dispute withEquitas over foregone interest on amounts that were due on certain reinsurance contracts. In the disputeEquitas alleged that we failed to make timely payments to them under certain reinsurance agreements in connection with subrogation recoveries received by us with respect to several catastrophe losses that occurred in the in the late 1980's and early 1990's. Excluding the impact of the aforementioned accrued interest expense, the average yield for the three months endedMarch 31, 2012 would have been 2.8%.
The portfolio duration was 4.0 years and 3.7 years for the three months ended
35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Net Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses Recognized In Earnings
OTTI recognized in earnings
$ (42 ) $ (154 )-72.7 %
Net OTTI losses for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 primarily consist of$0.04 million for equity securities previously impaired. Net OTTI losses for the three months endedMarch 31, 2012 consisted of one non-agency mortgage backed security and one equity security.Net Realized Gains and Losses
Our realized gains and losses for the periods indicated were as follows:
Percentage Three Months Ended March 31, Change In thousands 2013 2012 2013 vs. 2012 Fixed maturities: Gains$ 3,206 $ 3,142 2.0 % Losses (310 ) (1,300 ) -76.2 % Fixed maturities, net$ 2,896 $ 1,842 57.2 % Equity securities: Gains$ 1,918 $ - NM Losses - - NM Equity securities, net$ 1,918 $ - NMNet realized gains (losses)
$ 4,814 $ 1,842 NMNM - Percentage change not meaningful
Net realized gains and losses are generated as part of the normal ongoing management of our investment portfolio. Net realized gains of$4.8 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 are due to the sale of commercial mortgage backed securities and equity securities. Net realized gains of$1.8 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2012 are due to the sale of corporate bonds and municipal bonds. Other Income/Expense Total other income for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012 was$0.6 million and$0.9 million , respectively, and consists of foreign exchange gains and losses from our Lloyd's Operations, commission income and inspection fees related to our specialty insurance business. 36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Expenses
Net Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
The ratio of net losses and LAE to net earned premiums ("loss ratios") for the three months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012 is presented in the following table:Three Months EndedMarch 31 , Net Loss and LAE Ratio 20132012
Net Loss and LAE Payments 54.5 %64.6 %
Change in reserves 8.4 %3.5 %
Subtotal-current year loss ratio 62.9 %68.1 %
Prior year deficiencies (redundancies) 2.0 % -3.7 % Net loss and LAE ratio 64.9 % 64.4 % The net loss and LAE ratio for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 increased 0.5 percentage points to 64.9% from 64.4% for the three months endedMarch 31, 2012 . The increase in the loss ratio reflects the net prior period reserve deficiencies driven by adverse development from our Professional Liability business. The 64.4% loss ratio for the three months endedMarch 31, 2012 includes our net loss related to the grounding of the cruise shipCosta Concordia off the coast ofItaly , which was offset by net reserve redundancies from our Energy & Engineering business written byNavTech .The segment and line of business breakdown of the net loss and LAE ratios for the three months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:Three Months Ended March 31, In thousands 2013 2012 Insurance Companies: Marine 63.7 % 78.7 % Property Casualty 66.0 % 64.7 % Professional Liability 89.9 % 69.7 % Insurance Companies 69.3 % 69.3 % Lloyd's Operations Marine 55.3 % 64.8 % Property Casualty 9.5 % 27.9 % Professional Liability 78.5 % 31.6 % Lloyd's Operations 50.7 % 52.0 % Net loss and LAE ratio 64.9 % 64.4 % The changes in the net loss and LAE ratios by segment and line of business, as noted above, are primarily related to prior year reserve deficiencies and or redundancies, as described below. 37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Prior Year Reserve Deficiencies/Redundancies
The relevant factors that may have a significant impact on the establishment and adjustment of losses and LAE reserves can vary by line of business and from period to period. As part of our regular review of prior reserves, management, in consultation with our actuaries, may determine, based on their judgment that certain assumptions made in the reserving process in prior year periods may need to be revised to reflect various factors, likely including the availability of additional information. Based on their reserve analyses, management may make corresponding reserve adjustments. The segment and line of business breakdowns of prior period net reserve deficiencies (redundancies) for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows: Three Months Ended March 31, In thousands 2013 2012 Insurance Companies: Marine$ 1,193 $ (495 ) Property Casualty (156 ) (3,296 ) Professional Liability 6,693 1,075 Insurance Companies$ 7,730 $ (2,716 ) Lloyd's Operations: Marine (1,627 ) 55 Property Casualty (2,030 ) (2,738 ) Professional Liability 10 (1,467 ) Lloyd's Operations$ (3,647 ) $ (4,150 ) Total deficiencies (redundancies)
$ 4,083 $ (6,866 ) The following is a discussion of relevant factors related to the
$4.1 million prior period net reserve deficiencies recorded in the first quarter of the 2013:The Insurance Companies recorded$7.7 million of net prior period reserve deficiencies, of which$6.7 million was related to the Professional Liability business. Within the Professional Liability business, we reported prior period reserve deficiencies of$3.7 million from the Management Liability division related to specific large claims from our public and private sector directors and officers liability lines for underwriting years ("UY") 2010 and prior. In addition, we reported prior period reserve deficiencies of$3.0 million from the E&O division related to specific large claims from our insurance agents and miscellaneous professional liability lines from UY 2011 and prior. The$1.1 million of net prior period reserve deficiencies from our Marine business is due to adverse development related to one claim from our Inland Marine division for UY 2012. Our Lloyd's Operations recorded$3.6 million of net prior period reserve redundancies. Within the Lloyd's Operations Property Casualty business, we reported prior period reserve redundancies of$2.0 million from the Energy & Engineering division related to the favorable settlement of two claims from our onshore lines for UY 2011. The$1.6 million of prior period reserve redundancies from our Lloyd's Marine business is related to the favorable settlement of specific claims from our marine liability lines for UYs 2007 and 2004.The following is a discussion of relevant factors related to the
$6.9 million prior period net reserve redundancies recorded in the first quarter of 2012:The Insurance Companies recorded$2.7 million of net prior period reserve redundancies driven by net favorable development from our Property Casualty business. The Property Casualty business reported net favorable development of$2.4 million and$2.2 million from theNavTech and Primary Casualty divisions, respectively, across multiple lines and underwriting years, partially offset by$1.6 million of net prior period reserve deficiencies from our Assumed Reinsurance business. Our Lloyd's Operations recorded$4.2 million of net prior period reserve redundancies driven by the Property Casualty business, namely Lloyd'sNavTech , and the Professional Liability business, across all classes of business for UYs 2009 and prior. 38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Commission Expenses
Commission expenses paid to brokers and agents are generally based on a percentage of gross written premiums and are partially offset by ceding commissions we may receive on ceded written premiums. Commissions are generally deferred and recorded as deferred policy acquisition costs to the extent that they relate to unearned premium. The percentage of commission expenses to net earned premiums ("commission expense ratio") for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 , and 2012 were 13.1% and 16.1%, respectively. The decrease in the commission expense ratio for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012 is attributed to changes in the mix of business, mostly driven by an increase in the ceding commission on the new quota share program for our offshore energy business, and to a lesser extent RRPs recorded in 2012 in connection with loss events from our Marine business.Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses were$40.9 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to$36.3 million for the same period in 2012. The increase in operating expenses is primarily due to an increase in incentive compensation as well as increase in overall headcount due to continued investments in new underwriting teams and related support staff, closely aligned with business growth.Interest Expense
Interest expense relates to our Senior Notes dueMay 1, 2016 . Interest on these Senior Notes is due eachMay 1 andNovember 1 and the effective interest rate, based on the proceeds net of discount and all issuance costs, is approximately 7.17%. Interest expense for both the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012 was approximately$2 million .Income Taxes
We recorded income tax expense of$6.6 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to$3.3 million for the comparable period in 2012, resulting in effective tax rates of 32.3% and 29.3%, respectively. The effective tax rate on net investment income was 28.5% and 25.2% for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As ofMarch 31, 2013 , the net deferred federal, foreign, state and local tax assets were$4.0 million compared to$3.2 million as ofDecember 31, 2012 with the change primarily due to the increase in the deferred tax asset for unearned premium reserve, in line with the growth of our business. We had net state and local deferred tax assets amounting to potential future tax benefits of$0.4 million and$0.5 million as ofMarch 31, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012 , respectively. Included in the deferred tax assets are state and local net operating loss carry-forwards of$0.2 million for bothMarch 31, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012 . A valuation allowance was established for the full amount of these potential future tax benefits due to uncertainty associated with their realization. Our state and local tax carry-forwards as ofMarch 31, 2013 expire from 2023 to 2031. The Company has not provided for U.S. income taxes on approximately$18.0 million of undistributed earnings of its non-U.S. subsidiaries since it is intended that those earnings will be reinvested indefinitely in those subsidiaries. If a future determination is made that those earnings no longer are intended to be reinvested indefinitely in those subsidiaries, U.S. income taxes of approximately$1.9 million , assuming all foreign tax credits are realized, would be included in the tax provision at that time and would be payable if those earnings were distributed to the Company.Segment Information
We classify our business into two underwriting segments consisting of the Insurance Companies and the Lloyd's Operations, which are separately managed, and a Corporate segment. Segment data for each of the two underwriting segments include allocations of the operating expenses of the wholly-owned underwriting management companies andThe Navigators Group, Inc.'s (the "Parent Company's") operating expenses and related income tax amounts. The Corporate segment consists of the Parent Company's investment income, interest expense and the related tax effect. 39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
We evaluate the performance of each segment based on its underwriting and GAAP results. The underwriting results of the Insurance Companies and the Lloyd's Operations are measured by taking into account net earned premium, net loss and LAE, commission expenses, other operating expenses and other income (expense). Each segment also maintains its own investments, on which it earns income and realizes capital gains or losses. Our underwriting performance is evaluated separately from the performance of our investment portfolios.Following are the financial results of our two underwriting segments.
Insurance Companies
The Insurance Companies consist ofNavigators Insurance Company , including itsU.K. Branch , and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Navigators Specialty. They are primarily engaged in underwriting marine insurance and related lines of business, specialty insurance lines of business, including contractors general liability insurance, commercial umbrella and primary and excess casualty businesses, specialty assumed reinsurance business, and professional liability insurance. Navigators Specialty underwrites specialty and professional liability insurance on an excess and surplus lines basis. Navigators Specialty is 100% reinsured byNavigators Insurance Company .The following table sets forth the results of operations for the Insurance Companies for the three months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012:Percentage Three Months Ended March 31, Change In thousands 2013 2012 2013 vs. 2012Gross written premiums$ 301,628 $ 248,338 21.5 % Net written premiums 216,319 181,250 19.3 % Net earned premiums 154,331 131,548 17.3 % Net losses and loss adjustment expenses (106,985 ) (91,177 ) 17.3 % Commission expenses (18,517 ) (19,301 ) -4.1 % Other operating expenses (29,343 ) (25,345 ) 15.8 % Other income (expense) 659 1,642 -59.9 % Underwriting profit (loss) $ 145$ (2,633 ) NM Net investment income 11,951 8,935 33.8 % Net realized gains (losses) 4,792 1,875 NM Income (loss) before income taxes$ 16,888 $ 8,177 106.5 % Income tax expense (benefit) 5,404 2,258 139.3 % Net income (loss)$ 11,484 $ 5,919 94.0 % Losses and loss adjustment expenses ratio 69.3 % 69.3 % Commission expense ratio 12.0 % 14.7 % Other operating expense ratio (1) 18.6 % 18.0 % Combined ratio 99.9 % 102.0 %(1) - Includes Other operating expenses & Other income (expense)
NM - Percentage change not meaningful
Our Insurance Companies reported net income of$11.5 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to$5.9 million for the same period in 2012. The increase in net income for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was largely related to an increase in net realized gains, net investment income on our investment portfolio and an improvement in underwriting results. Our Insurance Companies combined ratio for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 was 99.9% compared to 102.0% for the same period in 2012. Our Insurance Companies pre-tax underwriting results increased by$2.7 million to a$0.1 million pre-tax underwriting profit for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to an underwriting loss of$2.6 million for the same period in 2012. 40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The Insurance Companies pre-tax underwriting results for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 includes$4.4 million of underwriting profit from our Excess Casualty and Primary Casualty businesses due in part to strong production attributable to the expansion of those underwriting teams and the continued dislocation of certain competitors, as well as$6.7 million of net prior period reserve deficiencies from our Professional Liability business.Our underwriting results for the three months ended
March 31, 2012 reflects a net loss of$5.5 million related to the grounding of the cruise ship,Costa Concordia . This loss was partially offset by net prior period reserve redundancies of$3.3 million primarily related to our Property Casualty business.Insurance Companies Gross Written Premiums
Marine Premiums. The gross written premiums for our Marine business for the three months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012 consisted of the following:Percentage Three Months Ended March 31, Change In thousands 2013 2012 2013 vs. 2012 Marine Liability$ 14,805 $ 18,241 -18.8 % Craft/Fishing Vessels 10,779 8,244 30.8 % Cargo 8,420 8,458 -0.5 % Protection & Indemnity 6,150 6,616 -7.0 % Inland Marine 4,882 11,838 -58.8 % Bluewater Hull 2,600 3,559 -26.9 % Other Marine 3,211 4,909 -34.6 % Total Marine$ 50,847 $ 61,865 -17.8 % The Insurance Companies Marine gross written premiums for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 decreased 17.8% to$50.8 million compared to the same period during 2012 primarily due to the re-underwriting of our Inland Marine business, as well as reduction in our marine liability lines is due to the non-renewal of certain policies.The Insurance Companies Marine business achieved a 4.0% increase on renewal rates for the three months ended
March 31, 2013 .Property Casualty Premiums. The gross written premiums for our Property Casualty business for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012 consisted of the following: Percentage Three Months Ended March 31, Change In thousands 2013 2012 2013 vs. 2012 Assumed Reinsurance$ 92,136 $ 73,422 25.5 % Excess Casualty 70,281 37,654 86.6 % Primary Casualty 26,436 23,925 10.5 % Energy & Engineering 20,064 13,201 52.0 % Environmental Liability 5,536 5,210 6.3 % Other Property & Casualty 4,511 2,507 79.9 % Total Property Casualty$ 218,964 $ 155,919 40.4 % The Insurance Companies Property Casualty gross written premiums for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 increased 40.4% to$219.0 million compared to the same period in 2012, driven by growth from our Excess Casualty division as a result of strong production attributable to an expansion of our underwriting teams and continued dislocation among certain competitors, as well as the continued growth from our Assumed Reinsurance division. Within our Insurance Companies Property Casualty business we have realized a 1.8% increase in rates for the Excess Casualty division, a 1.4% increase in the Primary Casualty division, and a slight 0.3% decrease from our Energy & Engineering division. 41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Professional Liability Premiums. The gross written premiums for the Professional Liability business for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012 consisted of the following: Percentage Three Months Ended March 31, Change In thousands 2013 2012 2013 vs. 2012 Errors & Omissions$ 22,653 $ 21,932 3.3 % Management Liability 9,164 8,622 6.3 % Total Professional Liability$ 31,817 $ 30,554 4.1 %Our Insurance Companies Professional Liability business has experienced an overall increase in its renewal rates of 6.1%, consisting of 13.2% and 3.8% for the Management Liability and E&O divisions, respectively.
Insurance Companies Commission Expenses
The commission expenses ratios for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 , and 2012 was 12.0% and 14.7%, respectively. The decrease in the commission expense ratio is attributable to changes in the mix of business, mostly driven by an increase in the ceding commission received on the new quota share program for our offshore energy business, and to a lesser extent$9.7 million in RRPs recorded in 2012 in connection with loss events from our Marine business.Insurance Companies Other Operating Expenses
Insurance Companies other operating expenses were$29.3 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to$25.3 million for the same period in 2012. The increase in operating expenses is due to an increase in incentive compensation as well as an increase in overall headcount due to continued investments in new underwriting teams and related support staff, closely aligned with business growth. 42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Lloyd's Operations
Our Lloyd's Operations primarily underwrite marine and related lines of business along with offshore energy, construction coverages for onshore energy business and professional liability insurance at Lloyd's through Syndicate 1221. Our Lloyd's Operations segment includes NUAL, a Lloyd's underwriting agency which manages Syndicate 1221.The following table sets forth the results of operations for the Lloyd's Operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012:Percentage Three Months Ended March 31, Change In thousands 2013 2012 2013 vs. 2012Gross written premiums$ 91,594 $ 94,811 -3.4 % Net written premiums 53,133 61,795 -14.0 % Net earned premiums 47,997 51,571 -6.9 % Net losses and loss adjustment expenses (24,357 ) (26,808 ) -9.1 % Commission expenses (8,621 ) (10,886 ) -20.8 % Other operating expenses (11,531 ) (10,962 ) 5.2 % Other income (expense) 542 6 NM Underwriting profit (loss)$ 4,030 $ 2,921 38.0 % Net investment income 1,702 2,283 -25.4 % Net realized gains (losses) (20 ) (187 ) -89.3 % Income (loss) before income taxes$ 5,712 $ 5,017 13.9 % Income tax expense (benefit) 2,046 1,726 18.5 % Net income (loss)$ 3,666 $ 3,291 11.4 % Losses and loss adjustment expenses ratio 50.7 % 52.0 % Commission expense ratio 18.0 % 21.1 % Other operating expense ratio (1) 22.9 % 21.2 % Combined ratio 91.6 % 94.3 %(1) - Includes Other operating expenses & Other income (expense)
NM - Percentage change not meaningful.
Our Lloyd's Operations reported net income of$3.7 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to$3.3 million for the same period in 2012. The increase in net income for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was largely attributable to stronger underwriting results, partially offset by a decrease in net investment income due to lower investment yields. The annualized pre-tax investment yield, excluding net realized gains and losses and net OTTI losses recognized in earnings, was 1.5% and 2.1% for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Our Lloyd's Operations combined ratio for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 was 91.6% compared to 94.3% for the same period in 2012. Our Lloyd's Operations pre-tax underwriting profit increased$1.1 million to a$4.0 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to$2.9 million for the same period in 2012, and is largely due to continued favorable loss emergence for UYs 2011 and prior.Our Lloyd's Operations underwriting results for the first quarter of 2012 reflected a net loss of
$1.0 million related to the grounding of the cruise ship,Costa Concordia . This loss was partially offset by net prior period reserve redundancies of$4.2 million related to our Property Casualty and Professional Liability businesses.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Lloyd's Operations Gross Written Premiums
We have controlled 100% of Syndicate 1221's stamp capacity since 2006. Stamp capacity is a measure of the amount of premium a Lloyd's syndicate is authorized to write based on a business plan approved by theCouncil of Lloyd's . Syndicate 1221's stamp capacity is £195 million ($296 million ) in 2013 compared to £184 million ($300 million ) in 2012.Marine Premiums. The gross written premiums for our Marine business for the three months ended
March 31, 2013 and 2012 consisted of the following:Percentage Three Months Ended March 31, Change In thousands 2013 2012 2013 vs. 2012 Marine Liability$ 17,815 $ 18,944 -6.0 % Cargo 10,004 13,678 -26.9 % Specie 6,455 6,296 2.5 % Energy Liability 5,856 6,102 -4.0 % Marine Excess-of-Loss Reinsurance 5,738 7,073 -18.9 % Transport 3,891 3,888 0.1 % War 2,482 3,286 -24.5 % Bluewater Hull 1,403 2,508 -44.1 % Total Marine$ 53,644 $ 61,775 -13.2 %The Lloyd's Operations Marine gross written premiums decreased 13.2% for the three months ended
March 31, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease is driven by reduction on retention in renewed business partially offset by an increase in renewal rates of 5.0%.Property Casualty Premiums. The gross written premiums for our Property Casualty business for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012 consisted of the following: Percentage Three Months Ended March 31, Change In thousands 2013 2012 2013 vs. 2012 Energy & Engineering: Offshore Energy$ 13,268 $ 11,319 17.2 % Onshore Energy 5,269 4,226 24.7 % Engineering and Construction 5,008 8,196 -38.9 % U.S. Direct and Facultative Property 1,528 - NM Energy & Engineering$ 25,073 $ 23,741 5.6 % Other Property Casualty (15 ) 555 NM Total Property Casualty$ 25,058 $ 24,296 3.1 %NM - Percentage change not meaningful
The Lloyd's Operations Property Casualty gross written premiums increased 3.1% for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. The increase is primarily due to new business growth within the offshore energy lines as well as$1.5 million in new business from our U.S. direct and facultative property lines that we began writing this quarter, partially offset by a reduction from our engineering and construction lines.The Lloyd's Operations Property Casualty business achieved a 1.6% increase on renewal rates for the three months ended
March 31, 2013 .44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Professional Liability Premiums. The gross written premiums for the Professional Liability business for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012 consisted of the following: Percentage Three Months Ended March 31, Change In thousands 2013 2012 2013 vs. 2012 Management Liability$ 10,242 $ 6,430 59.3 % Errors & Omissions 2,650 2,310 14.7 % Total Professional Liability$ 12,892 $ 8,740 47.5 % The Lloyd's Operations Professional Liability gross written premiums increased 47.5%, or$4.2 million , for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012, as a result of new business, partially offset by a 4.5% decrease in rate on renewed business.Lloyd's Operations Commission Expenses
The commission expenses ratios for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 , and 2012 was 18.0% and 21.1%, respectively. The decrease in the commission expense ratio for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012 is attributed to changes in the mix of business, mostly driven by the increase in the ceding commission received on the new quota share program for our offshore energy business.Lloyd's Other Operating Expenses
Lloyd's Operations other operating expenses were$11.5 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to$11.0 million for the same period in 2012. The increase in operating expenses is primarily due to an increase in incentive compensation.Capital Resources
We monitor our capital adequacy to support our business on a regular basis. The future requirements of our business will depend on many factors, including our ability to write new business successfully and to establish premium rates and reserves at levels sufficient to cover losses. Our ability to underwrite is largely dependent upon the quality of our claims paying and financial strength ratings as evaluated by independent rating agencies. In particular, we require (1) sufficient capital to maintain our financial strength ratings, as issued by various ratings agencies, at a level considered necessary by management to enable our Insurance Companies to compete, (2) sufficient capital to enable our Insurance Companies to meet the capital adequacy tests performed by statutory agencies inthe United States and theUnited Kingdom and (3) letters of credit and other forms of collateral that are necessary to support the business plan of our Lloyd's Operations. Our capital resources consist of funds deployed or available to be deployed to support our business operations. As ofMarch 31, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012 , our capital resources were as follows: March 31, December 31, In thousands 2013 2012 Senior Notes$ 114,462 $ 114,424 Stockholders' equity 896,758 879,485 Total capitalization$ 1,011,220 $ 993,909</money> Ratio of debt to total capitalization 11.3 %11.5 % 45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
As part of our capital management program, we may seek to raise additional capital or may seek to return capital to our stockholders through share repurchases, cash dividends or other methods (or a combination of such methods). Any such determination will be at the discretion of the Parent Company's Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our profits, financial requirements and other factors, including legal restrictions, rating agency requirements, credit facility limitations and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant. InJuly 2012 , we filed a universal shelf registration statement with theSEC . This registration statement, which expires inJuly 2015 , allows for the future possible offer and sale by the Company of up to$500 million in the aggregate of various types of securities including common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, depositary shares, warrants, units or stock purchase contracts and stock purchase units. The shelf registration statement enables us to efficiently access the public equity or debt markets in order to meet future capital needs, if necessary. This report is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such state. We primarily rely upon dividends from our subsidiaries to meet our Parent Company's obligations. Since the issuance of the senior debt inApril 2006 , the Parent Company's cash obligations primarily consist of semi-annual interest payments on the senior debt, which are currently$4.0 million . Going forward, the interest payments may be made from funds currently at the Parent Company or dividends from its subsidiaries.Navigators Insurance Company may pay dividends to the Parent Company out of its statutory earned surplus pursuant to statutory restrictions imposed under theNew York insurance law. As ofMarch 31, 2013 , the maximum amount available for the payment of dividends byNavigators Insurance Company in 2013 without prior regulatory approval is$69.4 million . During the preceding 12 month periodNavigators Insurance Company declared and paid$5.0 million in dividends to the Parent Company, none of which were declared and paid in the first quarter of 2013.Navigators Corporate Underwriters Ltd. ("NCUL") may pay dividends to the Parent Company up to the extent of available profits that have been distributed from Syndicate 1221 and as ofMarch 31, 2013 that amount was$8.0 million (£5.3 million).Condensed Parent Company balance sheets as of
March 31, 2013 (unaudited) andDecember 31, 2012 are shown in the table below:March 31, December 31, In thousands 2013 2012 Cash and investments$ 16,976 $ 15,026 Investments in subsidiaries 971,680955,024
Goodwill and other intangible assets 2,5342,534 Other assets 24,328 23,219 Total assets$ 1,015,518 $ 995,803 Senior Notes$ 114,462 $ 114,424 Accounts payable and other liabilities 944552 Accrued interest payable 3,354 1,342 Total liabilities$ 118,760 $ 116,318 Stockholders' equity$ 896,758 $ 879,485 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
$ 1,015,518 $ 995,803 46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
OnNovember 22, 2012 , we entered into a$165 million credit facility agreement withING Bank N.V. ,London Branch , individually and as Administrative Agent, and a syndicate of lenders. The new credit facility amended and restated a$165 million letter of credit facility entered into by the parties onMarch 28, 2011 . The credit facility, which is denominated in U.S. dollars, is utilized to fund our participation in Syndicate 1221 through letters of credit for the 2013 and 2014 underwriting years, as well as open prior years. The letters of credit issued under the facility are denominated in British pounds and their aggregate face amount will fluctuate based on exchange rates. If any letters of credit remain outstanding under the facility afterDecember 31, 2014 , we would be required to post additional collateral to secure the remaining letters of credit. As ofMarch 31, 2013 , letters of credit with an aggregate face amount of$145.9 million were outstanding under the credit facility and we have$0.8 million of cash collateral posted. This credit facility contains customary covenants for facilities of this type, including restrictions on indebtedness and liens, limitations on mergers, dividends and the sale of assets, and requirements as to maintaining certain consolidated tangible net worth, statutory surplus and other financial ratios. The credit facility also provides for customary events of default, including failure to pay principal, interest or fees when due, failure to comply with covenants, any representation or warranty made by the Company being false in any material respect, default under certain other indebtedness, certain insolvency or receivership events affecting the Company and its subsidiaries, the occurrence of certain material judgments, or a change in control of the Company. The letter of credit facility is secured by a pledge of the stock of certain insurance subsidiaries of the Company. To the extent the aggregate face amount issued under the credit facility exceeds the commitment amount, we are required to post collateral with the lead bank of the consortium. We were in compliance with all covenants under the credit facility as ofMarch 31, 2013 . The applicable margin and applicable fee rate payable under the credit facility are based on a tiered schedule that is based on the Company's then-current ratings issued by S&P and Moody's with respect to the Company's Senior Notes without third-party credit enhancement, and the amount of the Company's own collateral utilized to fund its participation in Syndicate 1221. Time lags do occur in the normal course of business between the time gross loss reserves are paid by the Company and the time such gross paid losses are billed and collected from reinsurers. Reinsurance recoverable amounts related to gross loss reserves as ofMarch 31, 2013 are anticipated to be billed and collected over the next several years as the gross loss reserves are paid by the Company. Generally, for pro rata or quota share reinsurers, we issue quarterly settlement statements for premiums less commissions and paid loss activity, which are expected to be settled within 30-45 days. We have the ability to issue "cash calls" requiring such reinsurers to pay losses whenever paid loss activity for a claim ceded to a particular reinsurance treaty exceeds a predetermined amount (generally$0.5 million to$1.0 million ) as set forth in the pro rata treaty. For the Insurance Companies, cash calls must generally be paid within 30 calendar days. There is generally no specific settlement period for the Lloyd's Operations cash call provisions, but such billings have historically on average been paid within 45 calendar days. Generally, for excess-of-loss reinsurers we pay quarterly deposit premiums based on the estimated subject premiums over the contract period (usually one year) that are subsequently adjusted based on actual premiums determined after the expiration of the applicable reinsurance treaty. Paid losses subject to excess-of-loss recoveries are generally billed as they occur and are usually settled by reinsurers within 30 calendar days for the Insurance Companies and 30 business days for the Lloyd's Operations.We sometimes withhold funds from reinsurers and may apply ceded loss billings against such funds in accordance with the applicable reinsurance agreements.
47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents Liquidity Consolidated Cash Flows Cash flow provided by operations was$4.3 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to$16.4 million for the comparable period in 2012. The decrease in cash flow from operations was due to the timing of payments to our reinsurers in connection with the increased use of proportional reinsurance to support our offshore energy business in 2013. Net cash provided by investing activities was$7.4 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to net cash used in investing activities of$98.5 million for the same period in 2012. The increase in cash provided by investing activities is driven by the on-going management of our investment portfolio. Net cash provided by financing activities was$1.5 million for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 compared to$0.3 million for the comparable period in 2012. The increase in cash provided by financing activities relates to the exercise of employee stock options. We believe that the cash flow generated by the operating activities of our subsidiaries will provide sufficient funds for us to meet our liquidity needs over the next twelve months. Beyond the next twelve months, cash flow available to us may be influenced by a variety of factors, including general economic conditions and conditions in the insurance and reinsurance markets, as well as fluctuations from year to year in claims experience. We believe that we have adequately managed our cash flow requirements related to reinsurance recoveries from their positive cash flows and the use of available short-term funds when applicable. However, there can be no assurances that we will be able to continue to adequately manage such recoveries in the future or that collection disputes or reinsurer insolvencies will not arise that could materially increase the collection time lags or result in recoverable write-offs causing additional incurred losses and liquidity constraints to the Company. The payment of gross claims and related collections from reinsurers with respect to large losses could significantly impact our liquidity needs. However, we expect to collect our paid reinsurance recoverables generally under the terms described above. 48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Investments
As ofMarch 31, 2013 , the weighted average rating of our fixed maturity investments was "AA" by S&P and "Aa" by Moody's. The entire fixed maturity investment portfolio, except for investments with a fair value of$21.7 million , consists of investment grade bonds. As ofMarch 31, 2013 , our portfolio had a duration of 4.0 years. Management periodically projects cash flow of the investment portfolio and other sources in order to maintain the appropriate levels of liquidity in an effort to ensure our ability to satisfy claims. As ofMarch 31, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012 , all fixed maturity securities and equity securities held by us were classified as available-for-sale. The following tables set forth the Company's cash and investments as ofMarch 31, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012 . The tables below include OTTI securities recognized within OCI. March 31, 2013 Gross Gross Cost or Fair Unrealized Unrealized Amortized In thousands Value Gains (Losses) Cost Fixed maturities: U.S. Treasury bonds, agency bonds and foreign government bonds$ 531,463 $ 7,988 $ (31 ) $ 523,506 States, municipalities and political subdivisions 449,387 17,619 (1,744 ) 433,512 Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities: Agency mortgage-backed securities 346,829 11,842 (640 ) 335,627 Residential mortgage obligations 38,350 1,223 (187 ) 37,314 Asset-backed securities 47,092 1,110 (29 ) 46,011 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 180,939 13,170 (29 ) 167,798 Subtotal$ 613,210 $ 27,345 $ (885 ) $ 586,750 Corporate bonds 483,943 25,970 (124 ) 458,097 Total fixed maturities$ 2,078,003 $ 78,922 $ (2,784 ) $ 2,001,865 Equity securities-common stocks 116,482 24,712 (247 ) 92,017 Short-term investments 129,475 - - 129,475 Cash 58,576 - - 58,576 Total$ 2,382,536 $ 103,634 $ (3,031 ) $ 2,281,933 December 31, 2012 Gross Gross Cost or Fair Unrealized Unrealized Amortized In thousands Value Gains (Losses) Cost Fixed maturities: U.S. Treasury bonds, agency bonds and foreign government bonds$ 649,692 $ 8,654 $ (36 ) $ 641,074 States, municipalities and political subdivisions 322,947 18,712 (380 ) 304,615 Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities: Agency mortgage-backed securities 384,445 13,652 (204 ) 370,997 Residential mortgage obligations 38,692 1,053 (549 ) 38,188 Asset-backed securities 50,382 1,133 (49 ) 49,298 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 204,821 17,996 (18 ) 186,843 Subtotal$ 678,340 $ 33,834 $ (820 ) $ 645,326 Corporate bonds 470,854 27,129 (25 ) 443,750 Total fixed maturities$ 2,121,833 $ 88,329 $ (1,261 ) $ 2,034,765 Equity securities-common stocks 101,297 16,919 (626 ) 85,004 Short-term investments 153,788 - - 153,788 Cash 45,336 - - 45,336 Total$ 2,422,254 $ 105,248 $ (1,887 ) $ 2,318,893 As ofMarch 31, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012 , debt securities for which non-credit OTTI was previously recognized and included in other comprehensive income, are now in an unrealized gains position of$0.4 million and$20 thousand , respectively. 49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The fair value of our investment portfolio may fluctuate significantly in response to various factors such as changes in interest rates, investment quality ratings, equity prices, foreign exchange rates and credit spreads. We do not have the intent to sell nor is it more likely than not that we will have to sell debt securities in unrealized loss positions that are not other-than-temporarily impaired before recovery. For structured securities, default probability and severity assumptions differ based on property type, vintage and the stress of the collateral. We do not intend to sell any of these securities and it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell these securities before the recovery of the amortized cost basis. For equity securities, the Company also considers its intent to hold securities as part of the process of evaluating whether a decline in fair value represents an other-than-temporary decline in value. We may realize investment losses to the extent our liquidity needs require the disposition of fixed maturity securities in unfavorable interest rate, liquidity or credit spread environments. Significant changes in the factors we consider when evaluating investments for impairment losses could result in a significant change in impairment losses reported in the consolidated financial statements. Invested assets increased from the prior comparable period in 2012 primarily due to unrealized gains and cash flow from operations. The annualized pre-tax investment yield, excluding net realized gains and losses and net OTTI losses recognized in earnings, was 2.3% and 2.0% for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The tax equivalent yields for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012 on a consolidated basis were 2.5% and 3.4%, respectively. The portfolio duration was 4.0 years and 3.7 years for the three months endedMarch 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Since the beginning of 2013, the tax-exempt portion of our investment portfolio has increased by$111.1 million to approximately 19% of the fixed maturities investment portfolio atMarch 31, 2013 compared to approximately 13.2% atDecember 31, 2012 . We are a specialty insurance company and periods of moderate economic recession or inflation tend not to have a significant direct effect on our underwriting operations. They do, however, impact our investment portfolio. A decrease in interest rates will tend to decrease our yield and have a positive effect on the fair value of our invested assets. An increase in interest rates will tend to increase our yield and have a negative effect on the fair value of our invested assets. The contractual maturity dates for fixed maturity securities categorized by the number of years until maturity as ofMarch 31, 2013 are shown in the following table: March 31, 2013 Amortized In thousands Fair Value Cost Due in one year or less$ 109,496 $ 108,751 Due after one year through five years 636,433 616,510 Due after five years through ten years 480,898 459,528 Due after ten years 237,966 230,326 Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 613,210 586,750 Total$ 2,078,003 $ 2,001,865 Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Due to the periodic repayment of principal, the aggregate amount of mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities is estimated to have an effective maturity of approximately 4.3 years. 50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the amount and percentage of our fixed maturities as ofMarch 31, 2013 by S&P credit rating or, if an S&P rating is not available, the equivalent Moody's rating. The table includes fixed maturities at fair value, and the total rating is the weighted average quality rating. March 31, 2013 Percent of In thousands Rating Fair Value Total Rating description: Extremely strong AAA$ 293,623 14 % Very strong AA 1,157,811 56 % Strong A 445,757 21 % Adequate BBB 159,109 8 % Speculative BB & Below 17,967 1 % Not rated NR 3,736 0 % Total AA$ 2,078,003 100 %The following table sets forth our U.S. Treasury bonds, agency bonds, and foreign government bonds as of
March 31, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012 :March 31, 2013 Gross Gross Fair Unrealized Unrealized Amortized In thousands Value Gains (Losses) Cost U.S. Treasury bonds$ 470,037 $ 5,540 $ (30 ) $ 464,527 Agency bonds 53,617 2,195 (1 ) 51,423 Foreign government bonds 7,809 253 - 7,556 Total$ 531,463 $ 7,988 $ (31 ) $ 523,506 December 31, 2012 Gross Gross Fair Unrealized Unrealized Amortized In thousands Value Gains (Losses) Cost U.S. Treasury bonds$ 414,503 $ 4,441 $ (10 ) $ 410,072 Agency bonds 155,465 3,331 (11 ) 152,145 Foreign government bonds 79,724 882 (15 ) 78,857 Total$ 649,692 $ 8,654 $ (36 ) $ 641,074 The following table sets forth the composition of the investments categorized as states, municipalities and political subdivisions in our portfolio by generally equivalent S&P and Moody's ratings (not all securities in our portfolio are rated by both S&P and Moody's) as ofMarch 31, 2013 . The securities that are not rated in the table below are primarily state bonds. March 31, 2013 Equivalent Net In thousands Moody's Fair Amortized Unrealized Equivalent S&P Rating Rating Value Cost Gain (Loss) AAA/AA/A Aaa/Aa/A$ 423,751 $ 408,604 $ 15,147 BBB Baa 19,654 19,267 387 BB Ba 2,246 2,013 233 B B - - - CCC or lower Caa or lower - - - NR NR 3,736 3,628 108 Total$ 449,387 $ 433,512 $ 15,875 51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the municipal bond holdings by sectors as of
March 31, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012 :March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 Percent of Percent of In thousands Fair Value Total Fair Value Total Municipal Sector: General obligation$ 114,926 26 %$ 73,642 23 % Prerefunded 23,555 5 % 22,692 7 % Revenue 252,037 56 % 183,096 57 % Taxable 58,869 13 % 43,517 13 % Total$ 449,387 100 %$ 322,947 100 %We own
$113.2 million of municipal securities which are credit enhanced by various financial guarantors. As ofMarch 31, 2013 , the average underlying credit rating for these securities is A+. There has been no material adverse impact to our investment portfolio or results of operations as a result of downgrades of the credit ratings for several of the financial guarantors.We analyze our mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities by credit quality of the underlying collateral distinguishing between the securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA"), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC") and theGovernment National Mortgage Association ("GNMA") which are Federal government sponsored entities, and the non-FNMA and non-FHLMC securities broken out by prime, Alternative A-paper ("Alt-A") and subprime collateral. The securities issued by FNMA and FHLMC are the obligations of each respective entity. Legislation has provided for guarantees by theU.S. Government of up to$100 billion each for FNMA and FHLMC. Prime collateral consists of mortgages or other collateral from the most creditworthy borrowers. Alt-A collateral consists of mortgages or other collateral from borrowers which have a risk potential that is greater than prime but less than subprime. The subprime collateral consists of mortgages or other collateral from borrowers with low credit ratings. Such subprime and Alt-A categories are as defined by S&P. The following table sets forth our agency mortgage-backed securities and residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS") by those issued by GNMA, FNMA, and FHLMC, and the quality category (prime, Alt-A and subprime) for all other such investments as ofMarch 31, 2013 : March 31, 2013 Gross Gross Unrealized Unrealized Amortized In thousands Fair Value Gains Losses Cost Agency mortgage-backed securities: GNMA$ 126,391 $ 4,074 $ (556 ) $ 122,873 FNMA 169,045 6,294 (62 ) 162,813 FHLMC 51,393 1,474 (22 ) 49,941 Total agency mortgage-backed securities$ 346,829 $ 11,842
$ (640 ) $ 335,627 Residential mortgage-backed securities: Prime$ 12,507 $ 417 $ (141 ) $ 12,231 Alt-A 2,139 81 (46 ) 2,104 Subprime 668 28 - 640 Non-U.S. RMBS 23,036 697 - 22,339 Total residential mortgage-backed securities$ 38,350 $ 1,223 $ (187 ) $ 37,314 52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the composition of the investments categorized as RMBS in our portfolio by generally equivalent S&P and Moody's ratings (not all securities in our portfolio are rated by both S&P and Moody's) as ofMarch 31, 2013 : March 31, 2013 Equivalent Net In thousands Moody's Amortized Unrealized Equivalent S&P Rating Rating Fair Value Cost Gain (Loss) AAA/AA/A Aaa/Aa/A$ 23,983 $ 23,252 $ 731 BBB Baa 2,203 2,220 (17 ) BB Ba 1,438 1,467 (29 ) B B 2,768 2,742 26 CCC or lower Caa or lower 7,958 7,633 325 NR NR - - - Total$ 38,350 $ 37,314 $ 1,036 Details of the collateral of our asset-backed securities portfolio as of
March 31, 2013 are presented below:Unrealized Amortized Gain In thousands AAA AA A BBB BB CCC Fair Value Cost (Loss)Auto loans$ 4,705 $ 3,536 $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 8,241 $ 8,056 $ 185 Credit cards 13,930 - - - - - 13,930 13,485 445 Time Share - - 16,035 - - - 16,035 15,640 395 Student Loans 5,255 3,253 - - - - 8,508 8,461 47 Miscellaneous 378 - - - - - 378 369 9 Total$ 24,268 $ 6,789 $ 16,035 $ - $ - $ -$ 47,092 $ 46,011 $ 1,081 The following table sets forth the composition of the investments categorized as commercial mortgage-backed securities in our portfolio by generally equivalent S&P and Moody's ratings (not all securities in our portfolio are rated by both S&P and Moody's) as ofMarch 31, 2013 : March 31, 2013 Equivalent Net In thousands Moody's Amortized Unrealized Equivalent S&P Rating Rating Fair Value Cost Gain (Loss) AAA/AA/A Aaa/Aa/A$ 180,939 $ 167,798 $ 13,141 BBB Baa - - - BB Ba - - - B B - - - CCC or lower Caa or lower - - - NR NR - - - Total$ 180,939 $ 167,798 $ 13,141 53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the composition of the investments categorized as corporate bonds in our portfolio by generally equivalent S&P and Moody's ratings (not all securities in our portfolio are rated by both S&P and Moody's) as ofMarch 31, 2013 : March 31, 2013 Equivalent Net In thousands Moody's Amortized Unrealized Equivalent S&P Rating Rating Fair Value Cost Gain (Loss) AAA/AA/A Aaa/Aa/A$ 343,134 $ 324,330 $ 18,804 BBB Baa 137,252 130,367 6,885 BB Ba 3,557 3,400 157 B B - - - CCC or lower Caa or lower - - - NR NR - - - Total$ 483,943 $ 458,097 $ 25,846 The company holds non-sovereign European securities of$78.1 million at fair value and$76.0 million at amortized cost, primarily in the investment portfolio. This represents 3.6% of our total fixed income and equity portfolio. Our largest exposure is inFrance with a total of$32.6 million followed bythe Netherlands with a total of$30.7 million . We have no direct material exposure toGreece ,Portugal ,Italy orSpain as ofMarch 31, 2013 . 54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes all securities in a gross unrealized loss position as ofMarch 31, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012 , showing the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss by the length of time those securities had continuously been in a gross unrealized loss position as well as the number of securities: March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 Gross Gross Number of Unrealized Number of Unrealized In thousands, except # of securities Securities Fair Value Loss Securities Fair Value Loss Fixed maturities: U.S. Treasury bonds, agency bonds, and foreign government bonds 0-6 months 8$ 40,455 $ 31 8$ 23,760 $ 22 7-12 months - - - 3 14,118 11 > 12 months - - - 1 4,652 3 Subtotal 8$ 40,455 $ 31 12$ 42,530 $ 36 States, municipalities and political subdivisions 0-6 months 58$ 129,906 $ 1,682 10$ 21,299 $ 325 7-12 months - - - - - - > 12 months 4 2,852 62 4 2,908 55 Subtotal 62$ 132,758 $ 1,744 14$ 24,207 $ 380 Agency mortgage-backed securities 0-6 months 22$ 46,654 $ 512 10$ 62,516 $ 174 7-12 months 3 7,921 128 2 1,671 30 > 12 months - - - - - - Subtotal 25$ 54,575 $ 640 12$ 64,187 $ 204 Residential mortgage obligations 0-6 months 5$ 1,673 $ 2 6$ 1,825 $ 22 7-12 months - - - - - - > 12 months 24 4,653 185 35 7,252 527 Subtotal 29$ 6,326 $ 187 41$ 9,077 $ 549 Asset-backed securities 0-6 months 1$ 631 $ 2 - $ - $ - 7-12 months - - - - - - > 12 months 1 1,743 27 2 2,369 49 Subtotal 2$ 2,374 $ 29 2$ 2,369 $ 49 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 0-6 months 1$ 1,149 $ 5 7$ 2,639 $ 7 7-12 months 2 802 11 - - - > 12 months 4 717 13 5 845 11 Subtotal 7$ 2,668 $ 29 12$ 3,484 $ 18 Corporate bonds 0-6 months 10$ 15,648 $ 121 2$ 3,528 $ 6 7-12 months - - - - - - > 12 months 1 1,497 3 4 6,689 19 Subtotal 11$ 17,145 $ 124 6$ 10,217 $ 25 Total fixed maturities 144$ 256,301 $ 2,784 99$ 156,071 $ 1,261 Equity securities-common stocks 0-6 months 4$ 8,011 $ 247 13$ 23,345 $ 522 7-12 months - - - 1 1,943 104 > 12 months - - - - - - Total equity securities 4$ 8,011 $ 247 14$ 25,288 $ 626 55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
We analyze the unrealized losses quarterly to determine if any are other-than-temporary. The above unrealized losses have been determined to be temporary based on our policies.
In the above table the gross unrealized loss for the greater than 12 months category consists primarily of residential mortgage-backed securities. Residential mortgage-backed securities are a type of fixed income security in which residential mortgage loans are sold into a trust or special purpose vehicle, thereby securitizing the cash flows of the mortgage loans.
To determine whether the unrealized loss on structured securities is other-than-temporary, we analyze the projections provided by our investment managers with respect to an expected principal loss under a range of scenarios and utilize the most likely outcomes. The analysis relies on actual collateral performance measures such as default rate, prepayment rate and loss severity. These assumptions are applied throughout the remaining term of the deal, incorporating the transaction structure and priority of payments, to generate loss adjusted cash flows. Results of the analysis will indicate whether the security is expected ultimately to incur a loss or whether there is a material impact on yield due to either a projected loss or a change in cash flow timing. A break even default rate is also calculated. A comparison of the break even default rate to the actual default rate provides an indication of the level of cushion or coverage to the first dollar principal loss. The analysis applies the stated assumptions throughout the remaining term of the transaction to forecast cash flows, which are then applied through the transaction structure to determine whether there is a loss to the security. For securities in which a tranche loss is present, and the net present value of loss adjusted cash flows is less than book value, an impairment is recognized. The output data also includes a number of additional metrics such as average life remaining, original and current credit support, over 60 day delinquency and security rating.Prepayment assumptions associated with the mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are reviewed on a periodic basis. When changes in prepayment assumptions are deemed necessary as the result of actual prepayments differing from anticipated prepayments, securities are revalued based upon the new prepayment assumptions utilizing the retrospective accounting method.
As of
March 31, 2013 andDecember 31, 2012 , the largest single unrealized loss by issuer in the investment portfolio was$0.3 million and$0.2 million .The following table sets forth the composition of the investments categorized as fixed maturity securities in our investment portfolio with gross unrealized losses by generally equivalent S&P and Moody's ratings (not all of the securities are rated by S&P and Moody's) as of
March 31, 2013 Equivalent Gross Unrealized Loss Fair Value In thousands Moody's Percent of Percent of Equivalent S&P Rating Rating Amount Total Amount Total AAA/AA/A Aaa/Aa/AMarch 31, 2013 :$ 2,379 85 %$ 236,052 92 % BBB Baa 247 9 % 15,563 6 % BB Ba 47 2 % 577 0 % B B 49 2 % 1,619 1 % CCC or lower Caa or lower 62 2 % 2,490 1 % NR NR - 0 % - 0 % Total$ 2,784 100 %$ 256,301 100 % As ofMarch 31, 2013 , the gross unrealized losses in the table above were related to fixed maturity securities that are rated investment grade, which is defined as a security having an S&P rating of "BBB-" or higher, or a Moody's rating of "Baa3" or higher, except for$0.2 million which is rated below investment grade or not rated. Unrealized losses on investment grade securities principally relate to changes in interest rates or changes in sector-related credit spreads since the securities were acquired. 56
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
The contractual maturity for fixed maturity securities categorized by the number of years until maturity, with a gross unrealized loss as ofMarch 31, 2013 is presented in the following table: March 31, 2013 Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Percent of Percent of In thousands Amount Total Amount Total Due in one year or less $ 3 0 %$ 1,505 0 % Due after one year through five years 63 2 % 26,313 10 % Due after five years through ten years 446 16 % 76,159 30 % Due after ten years 1,387 50 % 86,381 34 % Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 885 32 % 65,943 26 % Total$ 2,784 100 %$ 256,301 100 %
As of
The table below summarizes our activity related to OTTI losses for the periods indicated: Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 2012 Number of Number of In thousands, except # of securities Securities Amount Securities Amount Total OTTI losses: Corporate and other bonds - $ - - $ - Commercial mortgage-backed securities - - - - Residential mortgage-backed securities - - 1 55 Asset-backed securities - - - - Equities 2 42 2 143 Total 2$ 42 3$ 198 Less: Portion of loss in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): Corporate and other bonds $ - $ - Commercial mortgage-backed securities - - Residential mortgage-backed securities - 44 Asset-backed securities - - Equities - - Total $ -$ 44 Impairment losses recognized in earnings: Corporate and other bonds $ - $ - Commercial mortgage-backed securities - - Residential mortgage-backed securities - 11 Asset-backed securities - - Equities 42 143 Total$ 42 $ 154 During the three months ended March 31 2013, we recognized OTTI losses of$0.04 million related to two equity securities. During the comparable period in 2012, we recognized OTTI losses of$0.2 million related to one non-agency mortgage-backed security and two equity securities. 57
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
| Wordcount: | 14428 |


Wings co-founder now battles cancer, like many she aided [The Western News, Libby, Mont.]
NATIONAL INTERSTATE CORP – 10-Q – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Advisor News
- Nearly half of nonretirees doubt they will fully retire
- How much could failure to fund Social Security cost average Americans?
- How can more Americans achieve financial independence?
- Savers vs. spenders: How money management attitudes impact financial confidence
- Demonstrating the value of life insurance to Gen Z
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Jackson CEO Laura Prieskorn to retire at the end of 2026
- Has your annuity been reinsured in the Cayman Islands? Here’s why it matters
- DOL slams pension risk transfer lawsuit as ‘opportunistic’ litigation
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of New York Life Insurance Company and Its Subsidiaries
- Advisors don’t have an annuity problem; they have an integration problem.
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- New dashboard tracks Kansas Affordable Care Act enrollment by legislative district, county
- ICYMI – CANDIDATE COOPER NOW TRYING TO BLAME HIS HEALTH INSURANCE PALS FOR GOVERNOR COOPER'S 57% INCREASE IN HEALTHCARE COSTS IN NC
- Business People: Edric Funk to take over as Toro Co. CEO
- Insurers propose premium increases for ACA customers in Iowa
- How Does New CareScout Long-Term Care Insurance Policy Compare In Cost
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Best’s Market Segment Report: AM Best Maintains Stable Outlook on Vietnam’s Non-Life Insurance Segment
- AM Best Comments on Credit Ratings of Horace Mann Educators Corporation and Its Subsidiaries Following Announced Transaction with Medical Mutual of Ohio
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Hanwha General Insurance Company Limited
- Globe Life boosts Q2 earnings, eyes AI shift for long-term growth
- ATTORNEY GENERAL BRENNA BIRD LEADS FIGHT TO PROTECT IOWA PENSIONS
More Life Insurance News