Class-Action Suit Says Nationwide Life Sold Unauthorized Fixed Indemnity Health Plans
Copyright 2009 A.M. Best Company, Inc.All Rights Reserved BestWire
April 20, 2009 Monday 04:28 PM EST
626 words
Class-Action Suit Says Nationwide Life Sold Unauthorized Fixed Indemnity Health Plans
Fran Lysiak
SEATTLE
A proposed class-action lawsuit has been filed against Nationwide Life Insurance Co. alleging the company sold unauthorized fixed-indemnity health insurance plans to Washington residents that didn't provide them with adequate medical coverage when they needed it.
Filed in U.S. District Court in Seattle, the suit says Nationwide Life deceptively sold the plans to nearly 470 Washington residents without approval from the Washington State Office of the Insurance Commissioner.
According to the suit, Nationwide wasn't licensed to sell health insurance in Washington before Aug. 27, 2008. After that date, the state insurance department authorized the company to sell "certain limited fixed-indemnity health insurance plans" but the approval didn't extend to its existing unauthorized health plans.
These plans didn't comply with Washington laws mandating certain minimum benefits and coverage but instead provided a small, flat-fee payment when an insured was hospitalized or received some medical treatment, the complaint says.
Elizabeth Stelzer, a spokeswoman for Ohio-based Nationwide, said the company isn't commenting until it has had time to fully review the case.
One of the plaintiffs, Ruth Bjorklund, through her employer, enrolled herself, her husband, her teenage son and her adult disabled daughter in one of Nationwide's health plans, which took effect Oct. 1, 2006, the suit says. She paid Nationwide about $6,000 a year in premiums.
In May 2007, Bjorklund was diagnosed with a brain tumor and her physician recommended immediate surgery. She contacted Nationwide to submit a claim for coverage but learned the plan was a fixed-indemnity plan and wasn't "creditable coverage," the suit charges. She incurred more than $135,000 in uncovered medical expenses, the complaint says.
Until July 22, 2007, sales of fixed-indemnity plans were illegal in Washington state unless sold as supplemental coverage to comprehensive health insurance, the suit says. After that date, the sale of these plans as primary insurance was only allowed with required disclosures and after authorization by the Washington insurance department, the suit says.
"Many -- if not most -- of Mrs. Bjorklund's medical expenses would have been covered if Nationwide had sold Mrs. Bjorklund a health plan that complied with Washington law," the complaint alleges.
The proposed class is defined as all Washington residents who bought fixed-indemnity health insurance plans from Nationwide between April 16, 2003 and Aug. 27, 2008 and all state residents who bought these plans from Nationwide since Aug. 27, 2008 in which the plans weren't approved by the Washington Office of the Insurance Commissioner.
The suit cites violations of the Washington Consumer Protection Act. The plaintiffs want the federal court to order Nationwide to rescind the unauthorized health plans and refund their premiums. They also seek triple damages up to $10,000 for each violation of the act.
In November, AARP said it would suspend marketing and sales of several fixed-benefit indemnity plans offered by UnitedHealthcare after Sen. Charles Grassley raised concerns about the plans (BestWire, Nov. 12, 2008).
Grassley, R-Iowa, a ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, maintained the plans fail "to limit policyholders' exposure to the potentially high cost of a serious illness," according to a statement he issued. The AARP marketing materials, he said, include examples of medical expenses, but the examples are misleading and don't reflect how a policy would work in a typical situation. (BestWire, Nov. 12, 2008).
Nationwide Life Insurance Co. currently has a Best Financial Strength Rating of A+ (Superior).
(By Fran Matso Lysiak, senior associate editor, BestWeek: [email protected])
April 21, 2009


Advisor News
- Embracing a family-centric approach to financial planning
- Family communication: Financial planning’s growing blind spot
- Americans aren’t turning retirement plans into action, LIMRA finds
- Ashley Hinson ‘death tax’ story collides with truth
- How advisors can prepare clients for an uncertain retirement landscape
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Investigation finds deceptive sales, churning of annuities targeting postal workers
- Corebridge annuity sales slip ahead of Equitable marriage
- California teachers settle class-action lawsuit over in-plan annuity fees
- Jackson Financial CEO caps 40-year career with blockbuster Q2
- Lumos Insurance introduces the Immediate Care Plan to help families fund long-term care
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Medicare Reset Series 2027, Part 2: Difference between Supplements and Advantage Plans explained.
- California sets aside $250 million for public hospitals. Bay Area officials say it falls far short
- Louisiana hospitals see sharp uptick in uninsured patients after Obamacare subsidies expired
- Louisiana hospitals see sharp uptick in uninsured patients after Obamacare subsidies expired
- CareScout Redefines Worksite Long-Term Care Insurance With a Solution That Goes Further for Employers and Employees
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsProperty and Casualty News
- Enact Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ACT) Records 52-Week High Monday Morning
- Best’s Market Segment Report: Strengthened by Hard-Market Years, Global Reinsurance Segment Reaches an Inflection Point
- A rumor, a rating and a coliform scare test Lingle's small-town systems
- Financial habits that can influence insurance costs over time
- S.C.committee rejects relaxation of bar insurance mandate
More Property and Casualty News