Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Files Brief in Trump's Transgender Military Ban Case - InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading newswires
Topics
  • Life Insurance
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Property & Casualty
  • Advisor News
  • Washington Wire
  • Fiduciary Rule
  • INN Exclusives
  • Newswires
  • INNsider
  • INN Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • INN Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • ★ Regulation News
  • Podcast
  • Magazine
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Staff
  • Contact
  • Susbcribe

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Google+
Insider
newswires
newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints Share
July 8, 2018 newswires No comments Views: 22

Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Files Brief in Trump’s Transgender Military Ban Case

Targeted News Service (Press Releases)

NEW YORK, July 5 -- The Columbia Law School issued the following news release:

President Trump's ban on military service by transgender individuals runs counter to decades of well-settled judicial decisions forbidding the government from entrenching sex stereotypes in law, according to an amicus brief filed July 3 in the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals by Columbia Law School's Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic in a case challenging the ban.

The brief was filed in Karnoski v. Trump on behalf of major rights groups from across the country in support of transgender servicemembers challenging the ban, which President Trump first announced via Twitter in July 2017. The next month the president issued a formal memorandum directing the armed forces to prohibit transgender individuals from enlisting in the military. A previously existing ban had been lifted by President Obama in 2016.

In the brief, clinic director and Columbia Law School Professor Suzanne B. Goldberg argues that justifications for the ban--including that open service by transgender men and women would harm unit cohesion--"def[ies] decades of constitutional jurisprudence rejecting laws and policies that restrict opportunities for men and women based on sex."

Goldberg cites numerous cases in which such disparate treatment has been rejected by the courts, including Sessions v. Morales-Santana, a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last year that a citizenship provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act treating mothers and fathers differently violates the Constitution's Equal Protection clause.

"In short, assumptions that men must be one way and women another, even when rooted in traditional views and practices, are not sufficient grounds for governmental denial of opportunities to men and women who do not conform to those assumptions but are otherwise qualified and prepared to meet all relevant requirements," Goldberg writes.

Likewise, the government's argument that banning transgender individuals promotes fairness, safety, and privacy within the military should be rejected, Goldberg writes, citing similar arguments previously used to justify the exclusion of women, gay people, and racial minorities.

Goldberg is one of the country's foremost experts on gender and sexuality law. Before joining Columbia Law School, where she is co-director of the Center for Gender and Sexuality Law, she was a senior staff attorney at Lambda Legal and, in that capacity, served as co-counsel for the defendants in Lawrence v. Texas. She was assisted on the brief by Columbia Law School student Solomon Leung '20.

The underlying case was filed by Lambda Legal and OutServe-SLDN, a legal services organization for actively serving LGBT military personnel and veterans. It was later joined by the state of Washington. In December 2017, lower courts issued a preliminary injunction barring the ban from taking effect. In April, U.S. District Judge Marsha J. Pechman of the Western District of Washington upheld the preliminary injunction, rejecting the Trump Administration's plan to implement the ban, which would allow transgender people to serve only if they did so in their "biological sex."

Joining Columbia Law School's Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic on the brief are: California Women Lawyers, The Center for Reproductive Rights, Connecticut Women's Education and Legal Fund, Equal Rights Advocates, Legal Voice, Michigan Association for Justice, National Women's Law Center, Service Women's Action Network, and Women's Bar Association of the District of Columbia. Cynthia C. Robertson, Robert C.K. Boyd, and William C. Miller of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman also served as counsel on the brief.

Older

Elf Errands: Business looks to help elderly, disabled

Newer

3 firefighters suffer minor injuries at Millvale rowhouse fire; 3 residents escape unharmed

Advisor News

  • Going Broke Remains Top Concern In Retirement: CPA Survey
  • More Than 1 In 4 Americans Would Consider Divorce Over A Financial Secret
  • Financial Advisors Can Do Some ‘Life Coaching’
  • Commonwealth Financial Network Licenses Its 360° Software To MassMutual
  • The Way We’ve Always Done It Won’t Work With Millennials
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • Securian Financial Posts Solid 2018
  • SEC Extends Comment Period For Proposed Rules On VA And Variable Life Disclosures
  • ‘Dream House’ Raffle Winner Choice: Historic California Home Or $5M Annuity?
  • RGA Announces Longevity Transaction With Manulife
  • Jackson National Inks Deal To Distribute Annuities To RIAs
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits

  • Insurance Networks, Doctor Referrals Don’t Always Offer Full Picture
  • What Medicare For All Might Look Like If It Really Happened
  • Furloughed Workers Withdrew From Retirement Funds: Study
  • Democrats Roll Out Bill To Let Americans Buy Into Medicare At 50
  • Survey Finds Health Plans Are Struggling With Value-Based Reimbursement
More Health/Employee Benefits

Life Insurance

  • Securian Financial Posts Solid 2018
  • Understanding The Benefits Of Whole Life Insurance
  • Allianz Life Reports Solid 2018 Financial Results
  • Man Who Defraud Union In Life Insurance Scam Sentenced To Probation
  • SEC Extends Comment Period For Proposed Rules On VA And Variable Life Disclosures
Sponsor
More Life Insurance

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.
select Newsletter Options

Most Popular

  • NAIC Group Puts IUL Illustration ‘Multipliers’ Under Microscope
  • What If The Market Goes Up? Why An FIA Is Better Than Stocks
  • 3 Predictions For RIAs And Fee-Based Advisors In 2019
  • Understanding The Benefits Of Whole Life Insurance
  • Brighthouse Launches First Life Product Since MetLife Spinoff

Featured Offers

Text Ads

Press ReleasesAll press releases

  • Great American’s Annuity Customers Share Their Secrets to a Great Retirement
  • Securian Financial Introduces Affordable, Protection-Focused IUL with No-Lapse Guarantee
  • TD Ameritrade Institutional Integrates with iPipeline to Automate New Account Opening
  • RFP R2019-78
  • Bunker Launches Live Certificates of Insurance, A Modern Solution to Insurance Fraud and Non-Compliance
Add your Press Release >

Topics

  • Life Insurance
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Property and Casualty News
  • Advisor News
  • Washington Wire
  • Regulation

Top Sections

  • INN Exclusives
  • INN Insider

Our Company

  • About
  • Editorial Staff
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter Google+
© 2019 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
  • AdvisorNews

Sign in with your INNsider Account

Not registered? Become an INNsider.