Scientists pleased with bay progress; Researchers say evidence shows cleanup is working, but they fear cutbacks
For several years, some indicators have suggested that the
They say they are sure: The estuary is on a "significant" upswing.
"We've been waiting for this moment where we could say the bay as a whole is getting better," said
Scientists from
"We finally have a positive trajectory that's significant," Dennison said. "We went from not significant to very significant in terms of the statistics this year."
But as they celebrate the progress, some leaders say they worry the effort is under threat.
Recently released Chesapeake Bay Program data suggest
Gov.
"Now is not the time to lose momentum,"
The report card takes into account levels of pollutants such as nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment, and other measures of ecological health, including water clarity, oxygen content and abundance of underwater grasses, shellfish and microorganisms. The authors this year cited significant increases in dissolved oxygen levels and grass growth, and declines in phosphorus, nitrogen and chlorophyll, an indication that those nutrients are fertilizing fewer and smaller blooms of algae.
Algae blooms fueled by farm runoff and sewage pollution have plagued the bay for decades, clouding waters, blocking sunlight, and stripping waters of oxygen when they die and decompose.
Bay health fell to its nadir in 2003, according to data collected by UMCES going back to 1985. As recently as 2011, conditions were worsening. The center gave the bay a D+ for overall health that year. But since then, scores have improved in five of the past six report cards.
"These improvements are encouraging for water quality, and have positive impacts on the ecosystem," the scientists reported.
One positive impact has been the spread of underwater grasses, which increase oxygen content in the water and provide habitat for young fish, crabs and other aquatic creatures. An annual survey found record abundance of grasses - for the first time, more than 100,000 acres are visible across the bay.
"As water quality improves, they colonize these areas and grow very rapidly," said
While bay recovery has appeared strong in recent years, there have been questions about how much of the improvement could be linked to favorable weather or other matters of chance, not the effort that began in 2010 to set a pollution "diet" for the
Dennison said this year's report card results are the first with statistical significance - indicating that scores have improved so much the progress could not be simply due to chance. The scientists credit the pollution diet.
To bay advocates, that's a valuable endorsement of state and federal programs and funding they are working to defend.
"Scientists are the most skeptical people you're going to run into," said
Though many of the indicators are improving, some scores remain poor. Dissolved oxygen levels scored an A, but nitrogen levels earned a C+. Chlorophyll levels got a D+ and water clarity an F.
The scientists said the improvements mean bay ecosystems should be more resilient in the years to come, but they expect fluctuation. Heavy rain so far this year could mean worse scores on next year's report card, because increased runoff means more pollutants get washed into waterways.
Credit: By
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News