American Heart Association Issues Statement on Response to New Draft of BCRA
* * *
Today, the
Under the amendment, insurance companies would be allowed to charge higher premiums to people based on their health status--in addition to opting out of other patient protections in current law, such as the guarantee of essential health benefits and the prohibition on annual and lifetime coverage caps. Separating healthy enrollees from those with pre-existing conditions will also lead to severe instability of the insurance market. This is unacceptable for our patients.
Even without this amendment, the revised underlying legislation would still be devastating for patients everywhere - an infant diagnosed with cystic fibrosis, a woman who has experienced postpartum depression, or an adult who develops cancer. Millions of people who battle chronic diseases or disabilities, like heart disease, lung disease, or diabetes, would be negatively impacted by this legislation. Patients need a health care bill that does not jeopardize their access to necessary treatments and care.
We urge
Signers:
March of Dimes
WomenHeart:
* * *
NARAL Issues Statement on Unqualified Blogger for Sixth Circuit
Alliance for Retired Americans Issues Statement on Social Security, Medicare Trust Funds
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News