|Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc.|
Good morning Chairman Johnson, Ranking Member Shelby and members of the Committee. I thank you for inviting me to today's hearing on implementation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), international harmonization of swaps market reforms, and the
Swaps, now comprising a
As the financial system failed in 2008, most of us learned that the insurance giant AIG had a subsidiary,
Recently, we've had another stark reminder of how trades overseas can quickly reverberate with losses coming back into
I am authorized by the Commission to confirm that the
The role the unregulated swaps market played in the 2008 crisis led to a new international consensus that the time had come for comprehensive regulation. Swaps, which were basically not regulated in
The goal of the law is to:
. Bring public market transparency and the benefits of competition to the swaps marketplace;
. Protect against
. Ensure that swap dealers and major swap participants are specifically regulated for their swap activity.
Despite different cultures, political systems and financial systems, we've made significant progress on a coordinated and harmonized international approach to reform.
Implementation of Dodd-Frank Swaps Market Reforms
The CFTC has made significant progress in completing the reforms that will bring transparency to the swaps market and lower its risk to the rest of the economy.
During the rule-writing process, we have benefitted from significant public input. CFTC Commissioners and staff have met over 1,600 times with the public and we have held 16 public roundtables on important issues related to Dodd-Frank reform.
We are consulting closely with other regulators on Dodd-Frank implementation, including the
We substantially finished our proposal phase last spring, and then largely reopened the mosaic of rules for additional public comments. We have accepted further public comment after the formal comment periods closed. The agency received 3,000 comment letters before we proposed rules and more than 28,000 comment letters in response to proposals.
Last summer, we turned the corner and started finalizing rules. To date, we've completed 33 rules with less than 20 more to go.
The Commission is turning shortly to the rule to further define the terms "swap" and "security-based swap," the second of the two key joint further definition rules with the
Consistent with the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, the proposal states the CFTC regulates credit default swaps on broad-based security indices, while the
The Dodd-Frank financial reform shines bright lights of transparency - to the public and to regulators - on the swaps market for the benefit of investors, consumers, retirees and businesses in America. Transparency is critical to both lowering the risk of the financial system, as well as reducing costs to end-users. The more transparent a marketplace is to the public, the more efficient it is, the more liquid it is, and the more competitive it is.
The CFTC has completed key rules on transparency that, for the first time, provide a detailed and up-to-date view of the physical commodity swaps markets so regulators can police for fraud, manipulation and other abuses. We have begun to receive position information for large traders in the swaps markets for agricultural, energy and metal products.
We also finished a rule establishing registration and regulatory requirements for swap data repositories, which will gather data on all swaps transactions.
Starting this summer, real-time reporting to the public and to regulators will begin for interest rate and credit default swaps with similar reporting on other swaps later this year. Also later this year, market participants will benefit from the transparency of daily valuations over the life of their swaps.
By contrast, in the fall of 2008, there was no required reporting about swaps trading.
This month, we completed rules, guidance and acceptable practices for designated contract markets (DCMs). DCMs will be able to list and trade swaps, helping to bring the benefit of pre-trade transparency to the swaps marketplace.
Looking forward, we have two important remaining transparency rules to complete related to block sizes and swap execution facilities (SEFs). The trading of credit default swap indices will benefit from the transparency provided on SEFs.
The Japanese and European transparency proposals, as well as initiatives well underway in other jurisdictions, will further align international reform efforts and benefit the public.
For over a century, through good times and bad, central clearing in the futures market has lowered risk to the broader public. Dodd-Frank financial reform brings this effective model to the swaps market. Standard swaps between financial firms will move into central clearing, which will significantly lower the risks of the highly interconnected financial system.
The CFTC has made significant progress on central clearing for the swaps market. We have completed rules establishing new derivatives clearing organization risk management requirements. To further facilitate broad market access, we completed rules on client clearing documentation, risk management, and so-called "straight-through processing," or sending transactions immediately to the clearinghouse upon execution.
In addition, the Commission has adopted important customer protection enhancements. The completed amendments to rule 1.25 regarding the investment of funds bring customers back to protections they had prior to exemptions the Commission granted between 2000 and 2005. Importantly, this prevents use of customer funds for in-house lending through repurchase agreements. Clearinghouses also will have to collect margin on a gross basis and futures commission merchants will no longer be able to offset one customer's collateral against another and then send only the net to the clearinghouse. And the so-called "LSOC rule" (legal segregation with operational comingling) for swaps ensures customer money is protected individually all the way to the clearinghouse.
Furthermore, Commissioners and staff have gotten a lot of feedback from market participants on additional customer protection enhancements, including through a public roundtable. Staff is actively seeking further public input through our website and further meetings. Staff will use this outreach and review to put forward recommendations to the Commission for consideration. In addition, the
CFTC staff now is preparing recommendations for the Commission and for public comment on clearing requirement determinations. The Commission's first determinations will be put out for public comment this summer and hopefully completed this fall. They will begin with key interest rate products, as well as a number of CDX and iTraxx credit default swap indices. There is a great deal of consistency among the major jurisdictions on the clearing requirement, and the CFTC's timeframe broadly aligns with both
Currently, clearing exists for much of the standardized interest rate swaps, as well as for credit default swap indices, done between dealers. The major clearinghouses providing swaps clearing are registered with the CFTC.
Moving forward, the Commission will consider a final rule on the implementation phasing of the clearing requirement and the end-user exception related to non-financial companies.
Regulating banks and other firms that deal in derivatives is central to financial reform. Prior to 2008, it was claimed that swap dealers did not need to be specifically regulated for their swaps activity, as they or their affiliates already were generally regulated as banks, investment banks, or insurance companies. The crisis revealed the inadequacy of relying on this claim. While banks were regulated for safety and soundness, including their lending activities, there was no comprehensive regulation of their swap dealing activity. Similarly, bank affiliates dealing in swaps, and subsidiaries of insurance and investment bank holding companies dealing in swaps, were not subject to specific regulation of their swap dealing activities. AIG,
The CFTC is well on the way to implementing reforms
We completed in April a joint rule with the
Based on completed registration rules, dealers will register after we finalize the second major definition rule with the
The international community is closely coordinating on margin requirements for uncleared swaps, and is on track to seek public comment in June on a consistent approach. This is critical to reducing the opportunity for regulatory arbitrage. The CFTC's proposed margin rule excludes non-financial end-users from margin requirements for uncleared swaps. I've been advocating with global regulators that we all adopt a consistent approach.
The Commission is working with fellow regulators here and abroad on an appropriate and balanced approach to the cross-border application of Dodd-Frank swaps market reforms. The CFTC will soon seek public comment on guidance regarding the cross-border application of Title VII rules.
Market Integrity/Position Limits
Financial reform also means investors, consumers, retirees and businesses in America will benefit from enhanced market integrity.
Rules the CFTC completed last summer close a significant gap in the agency's enforcement authorities. The rules implement important Dodd-Frank provisions extending our enforcement authority to swaps and prohibited the reckless use of manipulative or deceptive schemes. Thus, for example, the CFTC has clear anti-fraud and anti-manipulation authority regarding the trading of credit default swaps indices.
Also, the CFTC now can reward whistleblowers for their help in catching market misconduct.
Last week, the Commission approved a proposed rule that would modify the CFTC's aggregation provisions for limits on speculative positions. The proposal would permit any person with a 10 to 50 percent ownership or equity interest in an entity to disaggregate the owned entity's positions, provided there are protections and firewalls in place to ensure trading decisions are made independently of one another. The proposal was a response to a
Position limits is another area where there has been close international coordination. The G-20 leaders endorsed an
Cross-border Application of Dodd-Frank's Swaps Reforms
The Dodd-Frank Act states in Section 722(d) that swaps reforms shall apply to activities outside
CFTC staff will soon be recommending to the Commission to publish for public comment a release on the cross-border application of swaps market reforms. It will consist of interpretive guidance on how these reforms apply to cross-border swap activities. It also will include an overview as to when overseas swaps market participants, including swap dealers, can comply with Dodd-Frank reforms through reliance on comparable and comprehensive foreign regulatory regimes, or what we call "substituted compliance."
There is further work to be done on the CFTC cross-border release, but the key elements of the staff recommendations are likely to include:
. First, when a foreign entity transacts in more than a de minimis level of U.S. facing swap dealing activity, the entity would register under the CFTC's recently completed swap dealer registration rules.
. Second, the release will address what it means to be a U.S. facing transaction. I believe this must include transactions not only with persons or entities operating in
. Third, based on input the Commission has received from market participants, the staff recommendations will include a tiered approach for requirements for overseas swap dealers. Some requirements would be considered entity-level, such as for capital, risk management and recordkeeping. Some requirements would be considered transaction-level, such as clearing, margin, real-time public reporting, trade execution and sales practices.
. Fourth, such entity-level requirements would apply to all registered swap dealers, but in certain circumstances, overseas swap dealers could comply with these requirements through substituted compliance.
. Fifth, such transaction-level requirements would apply to all U.S. facing transactions, but for certain transactions between an overseas swap dealer (including a foreign swap dealer that is an affiliate of a U.S. person) and counterparties not guaranteed by or operating as conduits for U.S. entities, Dodd-Frank may not apply. For example, this would be the case for a transaction between a foreign swap dealer and a foreign insurance company not guaranteed by a U.S. person.
In putting together this release, we've already benefitted from significant input from market participants. Throughout our nearly 60 rule proposals, we've consistently asked for input on the cross-border application of swaps reforms.
Commenters generally say they support reform. But in what some of them call a "clarification," we find familiar narratives of the past as to why many swaps transactions or swap dealers should not be regulated. Some commenters have expressed the view that if a transaction is done offshore, it should not come under Dodd-Frank. Others contend that as long as an offshore dealer is regulated in some capacity elsewhere, many of the Dodd-Frank regulations applicable to swap dealers should not apply.
The law, the nature of modern finance, and the experiences leading up to the 2008 crisis, as well as the reminder of the last two weeks, strongly suggest this would be a retreat from much-needed reform.
This happened with AIG,
As we move on from the rule-writing process, a critical part of our agenda is working with market participants on phased implementation of these reforms. We have reached out broadly on this topic to get public input. Last spring, we published a concepts document as a guide for commenters, held a two-day, public roundtable with the
In addition to these proposals, the Commission has included phased compliance schedules in many of our rules. For example, both the data and real-time reporting rules, which were finalized this past December, include phased compliance. The first required reporting will be this summer for interest rate and currency swaps. Other commodities have until later this fall. Additional time delays for reporting were permitted depending upon asset class, contract participant and in the early phases of implementation.
The CFTC will continue looking at appropriate timing for compliance, which balances the desire to protect the public while providing adequate time for industry to comply with reforms.
Confidence in the futures and swaps markets is dependent upon a well-funded regulator. The CFTC is a good investment of taxpayer dollars. This hardworking staff of 710 is just 10 percent more than what we had in the 1990s though the futures market has grown fivefold. The CFTC also will soon be responsible for the swaps market - eight times bigger than the futures market.
Market participants depend on the credibility and transparency of well-regulated U.S. futures and swaps markets. Without sufficient funding for the CFTC, the nation cannot be assured that the agency can adequately oversee these markets.
Nearly four years after the financial crisis and two years since the passage of Dodd-Frank, it's critical that we fully implement the historic reforms of the law. It's critical that we do not retreat from reforms that will bring greater transparency and competition to the swaps market, lower costs for companies and their customers, and protect the public from the risks of these international markets.
In 2008, the financial system and the financial regulatory system failed. The crisis plunged
The CFTC has made significant progress implementing reform having largely finished the rule proposals, and now having completed well over half of the final rules.
We are on schedule to complete the remaining reforms this year, but until we do, the public is not fully protected.
Read this original document at: http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=10c178ef-a902-4842-9972-ca169eaceb7d
|Copyright:||(c) 2010 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc.|