Fitch already notches up the Issuer Default Ratings of US bank subsidiaries and other domestic material entities from the bank holding company (BHC). The updated resolution plans are not expected to have immediate or broad rating implications. However, issuer-specific structures, liquidity and double leverage will ultimately influence individual ratings. All eight US GSIBs submitted updated resolution plans to address the shortcomings and deficiencies identified in their
Six of the eight plans contemplate the creation of intermediate holding companies (IHCs), or changes to existing IHCs, for those banks that have already created them. This is in line with the 2017 guidance on resolution plans from the Fed and
For those GSIBs contemplating an IHC under their proposed plans, the BHC would likely contribute substantial liquidity to the IHC, which will then hold this liquidity for the benefit of material entities. Importantly, IHCs are not expected to have third-party debt, but rather channel capital and liquidity among material entities and the BHC. The IHC structure is meant to ensure that capital and liquidity do not become unduly trapped in any legal entities, thus improving the likelihood of an orderly resolution. Furthermore, it also solidifies the Fed's source of strength doctrine, as it aims to reduce creditor challenges in a resolution.
Most of the plans anticipate including support agreements that allow liquidity to flow to the BHC under business as usual (BAU) terms in order to service BHC debt obligations. Fitch believes that identified nonbank material entities, such as broker-dealer subsidiaries, would benefit from these structural changes as it improves the likelihood of also receiving support from the IHC as a result of support agreements.
Fitch expects that if double leverage were to increase but is sufficiently offset by uninterrupted liquidity availability from the IHC under BAU, it will not likely result in any rating action, as debt service capacity will not be deemed impaired. Beyond structural specifics, ratings would also be sensitive if the resubmitted plans do not satisfactorily address noted deficiencies and are deemed not credible.
Other aspects of the resubmissions seek to address identified liquidity deficiencies and shortcomings by enhancing resolution liquidity adequacy and positioning and resolution liquidity execution need.
Fitch views resolution planning as having additional benefits beyond just outlining a path for orderly resolution. For example, resolution planning has reduced organizational complexity as a result of legal entity rationalization (LER), eliminating thousands of subsidiaries through the process. Coupled with LER, and in response to feedback from regulators, banks have improved their focus on shared services among subsidiaries, improving governance and becoming better able to understand how stress events may affect them.
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com.
The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings.
Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc.,
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from
+1 212 908-0771
+1 212 908-0560
+1 646 582-4964
Email: [email protected]
Source: Fitch Ratings