In a landmark ruling (http://www.becketfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/pdf.pdf) against the HHS Mandate, yesterday a federal judge ruled against the government holding that the supposed "safe harbor" was inadequate to protect religious organizations from suffering imminent harm.
"We are pleased the court recognized the significant harm that the mandate is causing right now," said
The judge concluded (http://www.becketfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/pdf.pdf) that "There is no 'Trust us changes are coming' clause in the Constitution." The court further stated that "ignoring the speeding train that is coming toward plaintiffs in the hope that it will stop might well be inconsistent with the fiduciary duties that plaintiffs' directors or officers owe to their members."
There are now 40 separate lawsuits (http://www.becketfund.org/hhsinformationcentral/) challenging the HHS mandate, which is a regulation under the Affordable Care Act (aka "Obamacare").
For more information, or to arrange an interview with one of the attorneys, please contact
tns gv51gv 121207-4131696 61GemaViana
|Copyright:||(c) 2012 Targeted News Service|
|Source:||Targeted News Service|