Combine Solicitation – DESK STUDY (DS) FOR MOROCCO – HYDROCARBON STORAGE, BLENDING AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY PROJECT AT PORT OF NADOR WEST
|Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc.|
Notice Type: Combine Solicitation
Subject: DESK STUDY (DS) FOR
Classification Code: R - Professional, administrative, and management support services
Solicitation Number: RFQ-PO201421291
Setaside: Total Small BusinessTotal Small Business
Place of Performance (address): HEADQUARTERS:U.S. TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (USTDA) 1000 WILSON BOULEVARD, SUITE 1600
Place of Performance (zipcode): 22209
Place of Performance Country: US
USTDA Contracts Office
REQUEST FOR QUOTE: Solicitation Number: RFQ-PO201421291,
3. QUESTIONS RELATING TO THIS SOLICITATION: Questions regarding this RFQ must be submitted by
4. NOTICE REGARDING SUSPENSION/DEBARMENT/INELIGIBILITY: Any contract awarded to a contractor who, at the time of award was suspended, debarred, and ineligible for receipt of contract with Government Agencies or in receipt of a notice of proposed debarment from any
5. SAM DATABASE: All Contractors must be registered in the Systems for Award Management (SAM) database via https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ in order to be eligible for contract award. Lack of registration in SAM will make an offeror ineligible for award as described in FAR 52.204-7. Do NOT delay submission of your offer pending receipt of a CAGE code. Offers may obtain information on registration via: https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM.
6. SET-ASIDE: This procurement is a small business set-aside with a small business size standard of less than
7. DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/STATEMENT OF WORK: Please see Attachment 1 to this RFQ. Vendors are reminded that failure to properly enroll in the SAM database, and provide accurate Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Tax Identification Number (TIN) information shall be excluded from award.
8. PROPOSED PRICE(S): Please submit proposed price(s) on the provided "Competitive Desk Study Cost Quotation Sheet" provide. Please see Attachment 2 to the RFQ.
9. INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE: All services are subject to the COR's final approval. All work will be inspected and accepted at USTDA's Office,
10. DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE: The performance of this contract shall start immediately after the effective date of award. The Contractor shall submit all deliverables under this Contract to the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) according to the schedule detailed in the statement of work. The Period of Performance for this Contract shall be one year from the date of the Contracting Officer's signature on the Contract. Performance of this contract shall be at USTDA's Office,
11. SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS: This solicitation includes the following additional contract requirements and terms and conditions:
* CONTRACTOR FOLLOW-ON (INELIGIBILITY). The Contractor and its subcontractors shall be ineligible to compete for, as a prime or subcontractor or otherwise, USTDA funded activities that result from this contract. USTDA reserves the right to grant a waiver, based upon FAR 9.503, if preclusion of the contractor or its subcontractors from the follow-on activity would not be in the Government's interest. This restriction shall remain in effect for three years from the completion of this contract. The contractor agrees to include this provision in all subcontracts to this contract.
12. CONTRACT CLAUSES: The clauses at 52.214-4, Contract Terms and Conditions-Commercial Items and 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-Commercial Items, apply to this acquisition.
13. INSTRUTIONS/CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS OR RESPONDENTS: The provision at FAR 52.212-1, Instructions of Offerors-Commerical, applies to this acquisition with the following addition: * Technical Proposal, not exceeding 5 pages, that documents their Technical/Financial Expertise and Desk Study Strategy/Approach (as outlined below in the evaluation factors for award), resumes for proposed key employees (not included in 5 page count), and reference information for at least one but not more than three clients for similar work in the last three years (not included in 5 page count). * In addition, the contractor shall provide completed Contractor Employee Biographical Data Sheets (See Attachment 3) and/or resume for proposed key personnel.
14. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD: FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation, Commercial Items (available at www.acquisition.gov under FAR), is being used. The following factors, in descending order of importance, will be used to evaluate all offers. All evaluation factors, other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important that cost or price. (1) TECHNICAL: The following sub-factors are listed in descending order of importance.
Sub-factor 1: Relevant technical expertise on similar projects in sector with an emphasis on the performance of activities of similar scope and complexity;
Sub-factor 2: Relevant educational background and professional experience on projects in sector and region;
Sub-factor 3: Quality of proposal, including, but not limited to the accuracy and relevance of information provided. (2) PAST PERFORMANCE (3) PRICE
All evaluation factors, other than cost or price, when combined are significantly more important than cost or price. The Government will evaluate price to determine the following: * Completeness: All information required by the solicitation has been submitted and is accurate.
15. BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: The Government will use Best Value Source Selection Procedures to evaluate offers and determine the best value. The Government will award a contract resulting from this RFQ to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation, as supplemented, who's proposal conforms to the RFQ requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by this solicitation) and is determined, based on the evaluation factors to represent the best value to the Government. The Government seeks to award to the offeror who gives USTDA the greatest confidence that it will best meet or exceed the requirement affordably. This may result in an award to a higher rated, higher priced offeror, where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors and the Contracting Officer reasonably determines that the technical approach of the higher priced offeror outweighs the cost difference. Offers will be evaluated in accordance with Attachment 4, Technical Ratings.
|Copyright:||(c) 2013 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc.|