IRS Identifies Mixed Straddles Using Straddle-by-Straddle Identification Under Section 1092
|Targeted News Service|
Mixed Straddles; Straddle-by-Straddle Identification Under Section 1092
A Rule by the
Entry Type: Rule
Action: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations.
Document Citation: 79 FR 41886
Page: 41886 -41889 (4 pages)
CFR: 26 CFR 1
Agency/Docket Number: TD 9678
Document Number: 2014-17009
Shorter URL: https://federalregister.gov/a/2014-17009
Final Regulations And Removal Of Temporary Regulations.
This document contains final regulations relating to section 1092 identified mixed straddles established after
Effective Date: These regulations are effective on
Applicability Date: For the date of applicability, see section 1.1092(b)-6(e).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, 98, amended section 1092 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) relating to straddles. As amended, section 1092(b) instructed the
This document contains amendments to the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 1) relating to mixed straddles subject to straddle-by-straddle identification under section 1092(b)(2)(A)(i)(I) (identified mixed straddles). On
Section 1.1092(b)-6T applied to identified mixed straddles established after
Written comments were received on the notice of proposed rulemaking and a public hearing was held on
After consideration of all comments, these final regulations adopt the provisions of the proposed regulations with certain clarifications, and the corresponding temporary regulations are removed. The comments and clarifications are discussed in this preamble.
Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions
In response to the request for comments in the notice of proposed rulemaking, several comments were received. The comments address three general categories of issues: (1) the immediate applicability date of section 1.1092(b)-6T; (2) the character mismatch and timing of gain or loss recognition for assets held by insurance companies; and (3) certain technical rules in the 1985 temporary regulations and the temporary regulations relating to identified mixed straddles.
1. Applicability Date
As previously noted, in response to comments raising concerns about the immediate applicability date of the temporary regulations, the regulations were corrected on
One commenter asked that the applicability date be delayed for at least six months after the publication date of the final regulations in the
2. Character Mismatch and Timing of Gain or Loss Recognition for Assets Held by Insurance Companies
Commenters noted that insurance companies generally are buy-and-hold investors that hold portfolio bonds to maturity absent other events compelling disposition. Bonds held by an insurance company are capital assets and the interest income generated by those assets is ordinary in nature. Consequently, when an insurance company sells a bond (sometimes pursuant to instructions from a regulator in the case of a bond that has deteriorated in credit quality), the sale may result in a capital loss that does not offset for tax purposes the ordinary income generated by the bond and other portfolio assets. The capital loss may expire unused unless the insurance company recognizes an offsetting capital gain. According to the commenters, the use of the existing regulations to generate capital gains allows an insurance company to avoid the transaction costs, risks of being unable to acquire suitable replacement property, and unfavorable accounting treatment associated with a sale and repurchase of appreciated bonds. The commenters requested that no new regulations on identified mixed straddles be issued because insurance companies rely on the existing regulations to control the timing of capital gain recognition on bonds in their portfolio.
The fact that bonds generate ordinary income on periodic payments but capital gain or loss on disposition (when held as a capital asset) is not unique to insurance companies, and is a fundamental aspect of debt (as well as stock) investments. Section 1092 was not intended to alleviate character mismatches on debt portfolios.
3. Technical Rules Relating to Identified Mixed Straddles
One commenter stated that the 1985 temporary regulations do not define what it means for gain or loss to be "attributable to" a section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddle period and asked the
Because these comments pertain to the operation of the 1985 temporary regulations, they are outside the scope of the proposed regulations, and the
The commenter also requested an amendment to the 1985 temporary regulations to clarify whether the rule in section 1.1092(b)-2T(c)(2) that resets the holding period on positions in an identified mixed straddle (holding period reset rule) continues to apply under these regulations, even to a position that had been held for the long-term holding period prior to the time the identified mixed straddle was established. Under the holding period reset rule, when an identified mixed straddle is established, the holding periods of all positions in that identified mixed straddle are reset to zero, and a position does not begin to accrue holding period until it is no longer part of a straddle.
This comment, requesting guidance on the holding period reset rule, is directly relevant to the computations required with respect to accrued gain or loss on a position when a taxpayer enters into an identified mixed straddle. Both the time period before a position becomes part of an identified mixed straddle and the time period after the identified mixed straddle is created are implicated by this comment. To address gain or loss that has accrued up to the day before a taxpayer enters into an identified mixed straddle, the text of section 1.1092(b)-6(a) has been revised and a new Example 3 in section 1.1092(b)-6(d) has been added to clarify that any gain or loss that would have been a long-term gain or loss under the 1985 temporary regulations will, when recognized, be a long-term gain or loss under these final regulations. To address gain or loss that accrues on or after the day a taxpayer enters into an identified mixed straddle, section 1.1092(b)-6(b) expressly provides that section 1.1092(b)-2T(a)(1) applies to positions in an identified mixed straddle. Consequently, the holding period reset rule in section 1.1092(b)-2T(a)(1) remains applicable to gain and loss that accrues on or after a position becomes part of an identified mixed straddle. As previously noted, the holding period reset rule resets the holding period on positions in an identified mixed straddle to zero and provides that a position does not begin to accrue holding period until it is no longer part of a straddle.
Finally, one commenter requested clarification as to whether unrecognized gain that accrued prior to a position becoming part of an identified mixed straddle is taken into account in determining whether a realized loss is deferred under section 1092(a). Section 1092(a) provides that any loss with respect to one or more positions shall be taken into account for any taxable year only to the extent that the amount of such loss exceeds the unrecognized gain (if any) with respect to one or more offsetting positions. In response to this comment, section 1.1092(b)-6(c) and a new Example 4 in section 1.1092(b)-6(d) have been added to clarify that the rules of section 1092(a)(3)(A), which include realized gain in unrecognized gain, apply to an identified mixed straddle. Section 1092(a)(3)(B), which applies to identified straddles that are subject to section 1092(a)(2) and includes only gain accrued after the establishment of the identified straddle, does not apply to the section 1092(b)(2) identified mixed straddles that are the subject of these final regulations.
[*Federal RegisterVJ 2014-07-18]
For more information about
TNS 22VistaJ-140718 gv-1169163
|Copyright: </td>||(c) 2014 Targeted News Service|