Amitraz, Carfentrazone-ethyl, Ethephon, Malathion, Mancozeb, et al.; Proposed Tolerance Actions
Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
Proposed rule.
CFR Part: "40 CFR Part 180"
RIN Number: "RIN 2070-ZA16"
Citation: "79 FR 40043"
Document Number: "EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0194; FRL-9910-45"
"Proposed Rules"
SUMMARY:
EFFECTIVE DATE: Comments must be received on or before
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0194, by one of the following methods:
* Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
* Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (
* Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:
* Crop production (NAICS code 111).
* Animal production (NAICS code 112).
* Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
* Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying information (subject heading,
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified.
C. What can I do if I wish the agency to maintain a tolerance that the agency proposes to revoke?
This proposed rule provides a comment period of 60 days for any person to state an interest in retaining a tolerance proposed for revocation. If
EPA issues a final rule after considering comments that are submitted in response to this proposed rule. In addition to submitting comments in response to this proposal, you may also submit an objection at the time of the final rule. If you fail to file an objection to the final rule within the time period specified, you will have waived the right to raise any issues resolved in the final rule. After the specified time, issues resolved in the final rule cannot be raised again in any subsequent proceedings.
II. Background
A. What action is the agency taking?
EPA is proposing to revoke, modify, and establish specific tolerances for residues of the fungicides mancozeb, spiroxamine, thiram, and triflumizole; the herbicides carfentrazone-ethyl and quizalofop ethyl; the insecticides amitraz, malathion, oxamyl, propetamphos, and spinosad; and the plant growth regulators ethephon and mepiquat in or on commodities listed in the regulatory text. In addition,
Also,
EPA is proposing to revoke certain tolerances because they are no longer needed or are associated with food uses that are no longer registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).
The proposed tolerance actions for mancozeb and malathion are consistent with the recommendations in their Reregistration Eligibility Decisions (REDs) of 2005 and 2009, respectively. As part of the tolerance reassessment process,
In REDs, Chapter IV on risk management, reregistration, and tolerance reassessment typically describes the regulatory position, cumulative safety determination, determination of safety for U.S. general population, and safety for infants and children. In particular, the human health risk assessment document which supports the RED describes risk exposure estimates and whether the Agency has concerns.
Explanations for proposed modifications in tolerances can be found in the RED document and in more detail in the
EPA had determined at the time of the RED that the aggregate exposures and risks are not of concern for the above mentioned pesticide active ingredients based upon the data identified in the RED which lists the submitted studies that the Agency found acceptable.
EPA has found that the tolerances that are proposed in this document to be modified, are safe; i.e., that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residues, in accordance with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C). (Note that changes to tolerance nomenclature do not constitute modifications of tolerances). These findings are discussed in detail in each RED. The references are available for inspection as described in this document under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
In addition, it is
EPA is proposing to revoke specific tolerances for residues of mepiquat and triflumizole because the Agency has concluded that there is no reasonable expectation of finite residues in or on the commodities associated with the tolerances, and therefore these tolerances are no longer needed.
The determinations that there are no reasonable expectations of finite residues for the tolerances listed in this document were made based on feeding studies submitted since the time that the tolerances were originally established. These feeding studies used exaggerated amounts of the compound and did not show measurable residues of the pesticide active ingredient tested. The Agency made the determination that there is no reasonable expectation of finite residues for the pesticides active ingredient/commodity combinations listed in this proposal in memoranda of
1. Multiple active ingredients.
2. Amitraz. There have been no active U.S. registrations for use of amitraz on cotton since
3. Carfentrazone-ethyl. Because the first cotton processing study submitted by the registrant was conducted at 1.0x the seasonal application rate and resulted in residues less than the Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) of 0.05 ppm,
Because uses supported by the carfentrazone-ethyl tolerance for caneberry subgroup 13A at 0.1 ppm are covered by the tolerance for berry group 13 at 0.10 ppm, there is no longer any need for the separate subgroup tolerance and therefore it should be revoked. In addition, because
4. Ethephon. Because the last product label amendment has been completed which limits the use of ethephon to cucumbers grown for seed production only and restricts the harvesting of treated cucumbers for human or animal consumption, a food tolerance for ethephon is no longer needed and therefore should be revoked. Consequently,
5. Malathion.
Based on product label changes to their use patterns and available field trial data that showed malathion residues of concern in or on apricot as high as < 0.65 ppm, avocado as high as < 0.08 ppm, fig as high as < 0.41 ppm, grape as high as 2.78 ppm, macadamia nut as high as < 0.10 ppm, melon as high as < 0.85 ppm, mushroom as high as < 0.10 ppm, okra as high as < 2.23 ppm, bulb onion as high as < 0.60 ppm, green onion as high as 4.88 ppm, peach as high as < 3.64 ppm, pear as high as 2.23 ppm, peppermint and spearmint tops as high as 1.43 ppm,
Available residue data may be translated by the Agency from one commodity to another related commodity where appropriate (e.g., have similar use patterns). Based on their use patterns and the translation of apricot data to nectarine, bulb onion data to garlic, and green onion data to leek and shallot (data previously mentioned herein),
Based on their use patterns and the translation of melon data (data previously mentioned herein) to pumpkin and winter squash,
Based on its use pattern and available field trial data that showed malathion residues of concern in or on asparagus were as high as 1.38 ppm,
Based on their use patterns and available field trial data that showed malathion residues of concern in or on blackberry as high as 3.99 ppm and raspberry as high as 4.96 ppm,
Based on their use patterns and the translation of blackberry and/or raspberry data (data previously mentioned herein) to boysenberry, dewberry, gooseberry, and loganberry,
Based on their use patterns and available field trial data that showed malathion residues of concern in or on turnip greens as high as 3.40 ppm and turnip roots as high as < 0.18 ppm,
Based on their use patterns and the translation of turnip greens data (data previously mentioned herein) to garden beet tops and salsify tops,
Based on their use patterns and the translation of the turnip root data (data previously mentioned herein) to garden beet roots, horseradish, parsnip, radish, rutabaga, and salsify roots,
Based on their use patterns and available field trial data that showed malathion residues of concern in or on potatoes as high as 0.05 ppm, and translation of that data to chayote roots and sweet potato roots,
Based on their use patterns and cucumber data which showed malathion residues of concern as high as < 0.11 ppm, and translation of that data to chayote fruit and summer squash,
Based on their use patterns and tomato data, which showed malathion residues of concern as high as 1.54 ppm, and translation of that data to eggplant,
Based on their use patterns and available field trial data that showed malathion residues of concern in or on alfalfa and clover forage as high as 110.12 ppm and 120.14 ppm, respectively, and translation of that data to trefoil forage,
Based on its use pattern and available storage stability data that showed malathion residues of concern in or on carrots were as high as 0.54 ppm,
Based on their use patterns and available field trial data that showed malathion residues of concern in or on mango were as high as < 0.12 ppm, passionfruit were as high as < 0.12 ppm, pineapple were as high as 0.17 ppm, and walnuts were non-detectable (< 0.10 ppm),
Based on their use patterns and available field trial data that showed malathion residues of concern in or on oranges as high as 1.91 ppm, and translation of that data to grapefruit, kumquat, lemon, lime, and tangerine,
Based on their use patterns and dry bean data, which showed malathion residues of concern as high as 0.74 ppm, and translation of that data to lupin seed,
Based on its use pattern and available field trial data that showed malathion residues of concern in or on peppers as high as 0.09 ppm,
6. Mancozeb. Based on label revisions and available field trial data that showed mancozeb residues as high as 0.738 ppm in or on wheat grain and 27.1 ppm in or on wheat straw, the Agency determined that the tolerances should be set at 1 ppm for wheat grain and 30 ppm for wheat straw, which when converted to carbon disulfide equivalents using a rounded conversion factor of 0.6X (based on relative molecular weights) is calculated as 0.6 ppm for grain and 18 ppm for straw. The Agency determined that data for wheat should be translated to barley, oat, and rye because of similar use patterns. In order to harmonize with Codex,
Based on available processing data that showed mancozeb residues concentrated 2X in flour and 4X in wheat bran and shorts, and a highest average field trial (HAFT) of < 0.748 ppm on the raw agricultural commodity (RAC), the Agency expected residues as high as 1.5 ppm for flour and 2.99 ppm for bran, and the Agency determined that the tolerances should be set at 2.0 ppm for flour and 3.0 ppm for bran and shorts, which when converted to carbon disulfide equivalents using a rounded conversion factor of 0.6X is calculated as 1.2 ppm for flour and 2 ppm for bran and shorts. The Agency determined that data for wheat should be translated to barley, oat, and rye because of similar use patterns. Therefore,
Based on sufficient data for wheat hay, where the field trial data showed mancozeb residues as high as 46.4 ppm, the Agency determined that the tolerance, in carbon disulfide equivalents, should be set at 30 ppm. No additional data for wheat hay have been received since the RED that would change that conclusion. (Although the Mancozeb RED stated that additional data for wheat hay were needed to establish a tolerance value, the Agency had received sufficient data prior to the RED to establish a tolerance value and no additional data are needed). The Agency determined that data for wheat hay should be translated to barley and oats because of similar use patterns. Therefore,
Based on label revision and available field trial data that showed mancozeb residues were as high as 12.6 ppm in or on papaya, the Agency determined that the tolerance should be set at 15 ppm, which when converted to carbon disulfide equivalents using a rounded conversion factor of 0.6X is calculated as 9 ppm. Therefore,
Based on available field trial data that showed mancozeb residues were not detectable (< 0.05 ppm) in or on field corn grain, the Agency determined that the tolerance should be set at 0.1 ppm, which when converted to carbon disulfide equivalents using a rounded conversion factor of 0.6X is calculated as 0.06 ppm. Therefore,
7. Mepiquat. Based on available data at an exaggerated feeding level of 7X the Maximum Theoretical Dietary Burden (MTDB) which showed mepiquat residues of concern in cattle meat, fat, and milk were below the limit of detection (< 0.05 ppm),
In addition,
8.
9.
10. Quizalofop ethyl. Because
11. Spinosad. The existing tolerance for spinosad on coriander leaves was translated from the tolerance for vegetable, leafy, except brassica, group 4 at 8.0 ppm. The 2009 Calendar Year Pesticide Data Program (PDP) summary, available at http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/science, reported that spinosad residues were detected in two cilantro samples out of 184 samples. Residues ranged from 0.016 to 0.030 ppm. Because fresh coriander leaves are included in herb subgroup 19A, fresh and residues on coriander leaves do not exceed the herb subgroup 19A, fresh tolerance of 3.0 ppm, there is no longer any need for the separate tolerance on coriander leaves at 8.0 and therefore it should be revoked. Consequently,
12.
13. Thiram. Currently, tolerances for thiram are established in 40 CFR 180.132(a) for residues of the fungicide thiram (tetramethyl thiuram disulfide). Thiram is a member of the class of dithiocarbamates, whose decomposition releases a common moiety, carbon disulfide. In order to allow harmonization of U.S. tolerances with Codex MRLs, the Agency determined that for the purpose of tolerance enforcement, residues of thiram should be calculated as carbon disulfide. Therefore,
14. Triflumizole. Because
Also, because there are no longer any registered triflumizole uses associated with feed items for poultry and swine, tolerances for triflumizole residues of concern on swine and poultry are no longer needed and therefore should be revoked. Consequently,
Based on available data at an exaggerated feeding level of 6X the MTDB which showed triflumizole residues of concern to be below the limit of quantitation (< 0.05 ppm) and projected residues at 1X the MTDB in cattle meat and milk to be well below the limit of quantitation (< 0.05 ppm),
In addition, based on available data at an exaggerated feeding level at 6X the MTDB which projected residues at 1X the MTDB in cattle fat, kidney, and liver to be < 0.05 ppm, < 0.10 ppm, and < 0.10 ppm, respectively,
B. What is the agency's authority for taking this action?
A "tolerance" represents the maximum level for residues of pesticide chemicals legally allowed in or on raw agricultural commodities and processed foods. Section 408 of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a, authorizes the establishment of tolerances, exemptions from tolerance requirements, modifications in tolerances, and revocation of tolerances for residues of pesticide chemicals in or on raw agricultural commodities and processed foods. Without a tolerance or exemption, food containing pesticide residues is considered to be unsafe and therefore "adulterated" under FFDCA section 402(a), 21 U.S.C. 342(a). Such food may not be distributed in interstate commerce, 21 U.S.C. 331(a). For a food-use pesticide to be sold and distributed, the pesticide must not only have appropriate tolerances under the FFDCA, but also must be registered under FIFRA, 7 U.S.C.
EPA is proposing certain specific tolerance actions to implement the tolerance recommendations made during the reregistration and tolerance reassessment processes (including follow-up on canceled or additional uses of pesticides). As part of these processes,
EPA has issued REDs for malathion and mancozeb. REDs contain the Agency's evaluation of the database for these pesticides, including requirements for additional data on the active ingredients to confirm the potential human health and environmental risk assessments associated with current product uses, and in REDs state conditions under which these uses and products will be eligible for reregistration. The REDs recommended the establishment, modification, and/or revocation of specific tolerances. RED and TRED recommendations such as establishing or modifying tolerances, and in some cases revoking tolerances, are the result of assessment under the FFDCA standard of "reasonable certainty of no harm." However, tolerance revocations recommended in REDs that are proposed in this document do not need such assessment when the tolerances are no longer necessary.
EPA's general practice is to propose revocation of tolerances for residues of pesticide active ingredients on crops for which FIFRA registrations no longer exist and on which the pesticide may therefore no longer be used in
Furthermore, as a general matter, the Agency believes that retention of import tolerances not needed to cover any imported food may result in unnecessary restriction on trade of pesticides and foods. Under FFDCA section 408, a tolerance may only be established or maintained if
Parties interested in retention of the tolerances should be aware that additional data may be needed to support retention. These parties should be aware that, under FFDCA section 408(f), if the Agency determines that additional information is reasonably required to support the continuation of a tolerance,
When EPA establishes tolerances for pesticide residues in or on raw agricultural commodities, consideration must be given to the possible residues of those chemicals in meat, milk, poultry, and/or eggs produced by animals that are fed agricultural products (for example, grain or hay) containing pesticides residues (40 CFR 180.6). When considering this possibility,
1. Finite residues will exist in meat, milk, poultry, and/or eggs.
2. There is a reasonable expectation that finite residues will exist.
3. There is a reasonable expectation that finite residues will not exist. If there is no reasonable expectation of finite pesticide residues in or on meat, milk, poultry, or eggs, tolerances do not need to be established for these commodities (40 CFR 180.6(b) and (c)).
EPA has evaluated certain specific meat, milk, poultry, and egg tolerances proposed for revocation in this document and has concluded that there is no reasonable expectation of finite pesticide residues of concern in or on those commodities.
C. When do these actions become effective?
EPA is proposing that the actions herein become effective 6 months after the date of publication of the final rule in the
Any commodities listed in this proposal treated with the pesticides subject to this proposal, and in the channels of trade following the tolerance revocations, shall be subject to FFDCA section 408(1)(5), as established by the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA). Under this unit, any residues of these pesticides in or on such food shall not render the food adulterated so long as it is shown to the satisfaction of the
1. The residue is present as the result of an application or use of the pesticide at a time and in a manner that was lawful under FIFRA, and
2. The residue does not exceed the level that was authorized at the time of the application or use to be present on the food under a tolerance or exemption from tolerance. Evidence to show that food was lawfully treated may include records that verify the dates when the pesticide was applied to such food.
III. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions,
The Codex has not established a MRL for carfentrazone-ethyl, mepiquat, propetamphos, quizalofop ethyl, spiroxamine, triflumizole, ethephon in or on cucumber, oxamyl in or on soybean seed, spinosad in or on coriander leaves, or total dithiocarbamates in or on barley bran, barley flour, field corn grain, oat flour, oat grain, rye bran, rye grain, wheat bran, wheat flour, and wheat, shorts.
The Codex has established MRLs for total dithiocarbamates determined as carbon disulfide in or on various commodities, including barley and wheat, each at 1 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg). These MRLs are the same as the tolerances proposed for mancozeb in
The Codex has established MRLs for total dithiocarbamates determined as carbon disulfide in or on various commodities, including papaya at 5 mg/kg. This MRL is covered by a proposed U.S. tolerance at a higher level than the MRL. The MRL is different than the proposed U.S. tolerance for mancozeb in
The Codex has established MRLs for malathion in or on various commodities, including onion, bulb at 1 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg). This MRL is the same as the tolerance proposed for malathion in
The Codex has established MRLs for malathion in or on various commodities, including asparagus at 1 mg/kg and peppers at 0.1 mg/kg. These MRLs are covered by proposed U.S. tolerances at higher levels than the MRLs. These MRLs are different than the tolerances established for malathion in
The Codex has established MRLs for malathion in or on citrus fruits at 7 mg/kg, grapes at 5 mg/kg, and turnip greens at 5 mg/kg. These MRLs are different than the tolerances proposed for malathion in
The Codex has established a MRL for amitraz in or on various commodities, including cotton seed at 0.5 mg/kg. This MRL is covered by the current U.S. tolerance at a higher level than the MRL, but would no longer be covered due to the proposed revocation of the U.S. tolerance.
The Codex has established MRLs for total dithiocarbamates determined as carbon disulfide in or on various commodities, including banana at 2 mg/kg, peach at 7 mg/kg, and strawberry at 5 mg/kg. The MRLs for banana and peach are the same as the U.S. tolerances proposed for thiram in
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
In this proposed rule,
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated:
Director,
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR chapter I be amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In
(a) * * *
(1) * * * GOES
Commodity Parts per million Alfalfa, hay 135 Almond, hulls 50 Almond, postharvest 8 Apple 8 Barley, grain, postharvest 8 Bean, dry, seed 8 Bean, succulent 8 Beet, sugar, roots 1 Beet, sugar, tops 8 Blueberry 8 Cherry 8 Chestnut 1 Corn, field, forage 8 Corn, field, grain, postharvest 8 Corn, pop, grain, postharvest 8 Corn, sweet, forage 8 Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed 2 Cowpea, forage 135 Cowpea, hay 135 Cranberry 8 Cucumber 8 Currant 8 Date, dried fruit 8 Flax, seed 0.1 Guava 8 Hazelnut 1 Hop, dried cones 1 Lentil, seed 8 Lespedeza, hay 135 Oat, grain, postharvest 8 Papaya 1 Pea 8 Pea, field, hay 8 Pea, field, vines 8 Peanut, hay 135 Peanut, postharvest 8 Plum 8 Plum, prune 8 Quince 8 Rice, grain, postharvest 8 Rice, wild 8 Rye, grain, postharvest 8 Safflower, seed 0.2 Sorghum, grain, forage 8 Sorghum, grain, grain, postharvest 8 Soybean, forage 135 Soybean, hay 135 Soybean, seed 8 Soybean, vegetable, succulent 8 Strawberry 8 Sunflower, seed, postharvest 8 Tomato 8 Trefoil, hay 135 Vegetable, brassica, leafy, group 5 8 Vegetable, leafy, except brassica, group 4 8 Vetch, hay 135 Wheat, grain, postharvest 8
(2) Tolerances are established for residues of the insecticide malathion, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on the commodities in the table in this paragraph. Compliance with the tolerance levels specified in this paragraph is to be determined by measuring only the sum of malathion (O,O -dimethyl dithiophosphate of diethyl mercaptosuccinate), and its metabolite malaoxon (O,O -dimethyl thiophosphate of diethyl mercaptosuccinate), in or on the commodity. GOES
Commodity Parts per million Alfalfa, forage 125 Apricot 1.0 Asparagus 2.0 Avocado 0.2 Barley, straw 50 Beet, garden, roots 0.5 Beet, garden, tops 4.0 Blackberry 6 Boysenberry 6 Carrot, roots 1 Chayote, fruit 0.2 Chayote, roots 0.1 Clover, forage 125 Clover, hay 125 Corn, field, stover 30.0 Cotton, undelinted seed 20.0 Dewberry 6 Eggplant 2.0 Fig 1.0 Garlic, bulb 1.0 Gooseberry 6 Grape 4.0 Grapefruit 4.0 Grass, forage 200 Grass, hay 270 Horseradish 0.5 Kumquat 4.0 Leek 6.0 Lemon 4.0 Lime 4.0 Loganberry 6 Lupin, seed 2.0 Mango 0.2 Melon 1.0 Mushroom 0.2 Nectarine 1.0 Nut, macadamia 0.2 Oat, forage 4.0 Oat, straw 50 Okra 3.0 Onion, bulb 1.0 Onion, green 6.0 Orange 4.0 Parsnip 0.5 Passionfruit 0.2 Peach 6.0 Pear 3.0 Pecan 0.2 Pepper 0.5 Peppermint, tops 2.0 Pineapple 0.2 Potato 0.1 Pumpkin 1.0 Radish 0.5 Raspberry 6 Rutabaga 0.5 Rye, forage 4.0 Rye, straw 50 Salsify, roots 0.5 Salsify, tops 4.0 Shallot, bulb 6.0 Spearmint, tops 2.0 Squash, summer 0.2 Squash, winter 1.0 Sweet potato, roots 0.1 Tangerine 4.0 Trefoil, forage 125 Turnip, greens 4.0 Turnip, roots 0.5 Walnut 0.2 Watercress 0.2 Wheat, forage 4.0 Wheat, straw 50
* * * * *
3. In
(a) General. Tolerances are established for residues of the fungicide thiram, tetramethyl thiuram disulfide, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on the commodities in the table in this paragraph. Compliance with the tolerance levels specified in this paragraph is to be determined by measuring only those thiram residues convertible to and expressed in terms of the degradate carbon disulfide, in or on the commodity. GOES
Commodity Parts per Expiration/ million revocation date Apple 5 None Banana *1 2.0 3/31/15 Peach 7.0 None Strawberry 13 None *1 There are no U.S. registrations as ofSeptember 23, 2009 .
* * * * *
4. In
5. In
6. In
(a) * * * GOES
Commodity Parts per million Almond 0.1 Almond, hulls 4 Apple 0.6 Asparagus 0.1 Atemoya 3.0 Banana 2 Barley, bran 2 Barley, flour 1.2 Barley, grain 1 Barley, hay 30 Barley, pearled barley 20 Barley, straw 25 Beet, sugar, dried pulp 3.0 Beet, sugar, roots 1.2 Beet, sugar, tops 60 Broccoli 7 Cabbage 9 Canistel 15.0 Cattle, kidney 0.5 Cattle, liver 0.5 Cherimoya 3.0 Corn, field, forage 40 Corn, field, grain 0.06 Corn, field, stover 15 Corn, pop, grain 0.1 Corn, pop, stover 40 Corn, sweet, forage 70 Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed 0.1 Corn, sweet, stover 40 Cotton, undelinted seed 0.5 Crabapple 0.6 Cranberry 5 Custard apple 3.0 Fennel 2.5 Flax, seed 0.15 Ginseng 1.2 Goat, kidney 0.5 Goat, liver 0.5 Grape 1.5 Hog, kidney 0.5 Hog, liver 0.5 Horse, kidney 0.5 Horse, liver 0.5 Lettuce, head 3.5 Lettuce, leaf 18 Mango 15.0 Oat, flour 1.2 Oat, grain 1 Oat, groats/rolled oats 20 Oat, hay 30 Oat, straw 25 Onion, bulb 1.5 Papaya 9 Peanut 0.1 Peanut, hay 65 Pear 0.6 Pepper 12 Potato 0.2 Poultry, kidney 0.5 Poultry, liver 0.5 Quince 0.6 Rice, grain 0.06 Rye, bran 2 Rye, flour 1.2 Rye, grain 1 Rye, straw 25 Sapodilla 15.0 Sapote, mamey 15.0 Sapote, white 15.0 Sheep, kidney 0.5 Sheep, liver 0.5 Sorghum, grain, forage 0.15 Sorghum, grain, grain 0.25 Sorghum, grain, stover 0.15 Star apple 15.0 Sugar apple 3.0 Tangerine *1 10 Tomato 2.5 Vegetable, cucurbit, group 9 2.0 Walnut 0.70 Wheat, bran 2 Wheat, flour 1.2 Wheat, germ 20 Wheat, grain 1 Wheat, hay 30 Wheat, middlings 20 Wheat, shorts 2 Wheat, straw 25 *1 There are no U.S. registrations for use of mancozeb on tangerine.
* * * * *
7. In
8. In
9. In
10. In
11. In
12. In
13. In
14. In
15. In
16. In
17. In
18. In
19. In
(a) General. Tolerances are established for residues of the plant growth regulator mepiquat, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on the commodities in the table in this paragraph. Compliance with the tolerance levels specified in this paragraph is to be determined by measuring only mepiquat, N,N -dimethylpiperidinium, in or on the commodity. GOES
Commodity Parts per million Cattle, meat byproducts 0.1 Cotton, gin byproducts 6.0 Cotton, undelinted seed 2.0 Goat, meat byproducts 0.1 Grape 1.0 Grape, raisin 5.0 Hog, meat byproducts 0.1 Horse, meat byproducts 0.1 Sheep, meat byproducts 0.1
* * * * *
20. In
21. In
22. In
23. In
24. In
25. In
26. In
27. In
28. In
29. In
30. In
31. In
32. In
33. In
34. In
(a) * * *
(1) * * * GOES
Commodity Parts per million Berry, low growing, subgroup 13-07G, except cranberry 2.0 Brassica, head and stem, subgroup 5A 8.0 Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B 40 Canistel 2.5 Cherry, sweet 1.5 Cherry, tart 1.5 Cilantro, leaves 35 Fruit, pome, group 11-10 0.50 Fruit, small, vine climbing, except fuzzy kiwifruit, subgroup 2.5 13-07F Hazelnut 0.05 Hop, dried cones 50 Leafy greens subgroup 4A, except spinach 35 Mango 2.5 Papaya 2.5 Pineapple 4.0 Sapodilla 2.5 Sapote, black 2.5 Sapote, mamey 2.5 Star apple 2.5 Swiss chard 18 Tomato 1.5 Turnip, greens 40 Vegetable, cucurbit, group 9 0.5
(2) * * * GOES
Commodity Parts per million Cattle, fat 0.10 Cattle, meat byproducts 0.20 Goat, fat 0.10 Goat, meat byproducts 0.20 Horse, fat 0.10 Horse, meat byproducts 0.20 Sheep, fat 0.10 Sheep, meat byproducts 0.20
* * * * *
35. In
36. In
37. In
38. In
39. In
40. In
41. Remove
42. In
43. In
44. In
45. In
46. In
47. In
[FR Doc. 2014-16063 Filed 7-10-14;
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Copyright: | (c) 2014 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
Wordcount: | 11140 |
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News