Farm Bill Panel Recommends Exploring Crop-Insurance Choices
|By Josie Musico, Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, Texas|
|McClatchy-Tribune Information Services|
"While this thing is extremely complicated, complications provide opportunities," he said.
A half-dozen other speakers updated producers in the meeting, which was a joint effort by the
"(Direct payments) are gone, and I don't see us going back to them anytime soon," he said. "The farm bill is a true safety net. There has to be a problem for the safety net to kick in."
The speakers suggested producers consider all their options for the types of insurance plans.
"We worked hard on this farm bill to give you some choices," said U.S. Rep.
Two main options are price-loss coverage and agriculture-risk coverage, according to the presentation. Agriculture-risk coverage is further divided by county and individual plans.
Outlaw said county ARC plans are based on combined data from more farms than individual ARC.
"It's using county yields to set that benchmark," he said.
Noting the farm bill's five-year life span, Outlaw also recommended producers consider their long-term goals when selecting an insurance plan.
"If you make this decision based on getting a payment one year, you're going to get what you deserve," he said. "This is a five-year bill."
"It's crop by crop and farm by farm," he said. "You can mix and match however you want."
And unfortunately for the South Plains, neither plan covers cotton.
"If they didn't offer you a transitional payment, you would have no coverage," Outlaw said.
Follow Josie on
(c)2014 the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal (Lubbock, Texas)
Visit the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal (Lubbock, Texas) at www.lubbockonline.com
Distributed by MCT Information Services