The Republican lawsuit targets reinsurance that helps insurance companies provide universal coverage without accounting for pre-existing conditions.
Tampa, FL (PRWEB) January 02, 2014
It’s been an eventful year for public adjusters and the insurance claims industry in Florida. While many insurance industry and weather prognosticators try to predict what will happen in 2014, insurance claims public adjuster Tutwiler & Associates is offering its Florida and National Flood Program property insurance claims wish list for 2014. “It’s our way of helping to frame and focus on the property claims issues that will have the biggest impact on homeowners and business policyholders,” says Charles R. "Dick" Tutwiler, President of Tampa based Tutwiler & Associates.
Now in its 30th year as a licensed public adjuster serving the Atlantic and Gulf Coast states, the firm provides its wish list for policyholders, insurance carriers, and the Florida Legislature while highlighting the most pressing issues facing Florida's property insurance marketplace.
1. We wish the U.S. Congress would fix the Biggert-Waters 2012 National Flood Insurance Reform Act. This extremely ill-conceived act of Congress is causing great harm to homeowners all across this country. Remember, an affordability study was supposed to have been commissioned with this legislation but is now two years away according to some accounts in the media. Meanwhile, policyholders who have been in their homes for years ( we’re not just talking about high priced homeowners) are hurting because of premium increases and no buyers for their property. Shame on Congress for this!
2. We wish for a complete overhaul to the National Flood Insurance Program’s policies and claim procedures. This is another example of Congress and the bureaucrats meddling in the lives of Americans who thought they really had flood coverage. Do you know if you have a flood loss, you must file a proof of loss within sixty days or lose your policy benefits? In other words, you have sixty days to figure out your damages and price the loss out. Florida recently passed legislation that gives property owners 3 years, which previously was 5 years to determine their damages and file a claim. So why sixty days with the federal flood program? As we have seen with Superstorm Sandy and much lesser flood events, figuring out damages from a CAT loss is no easy task! The list of other things NFIP “DOES NOT” cover or restricts is too long to list here. Be assured, if you have a flood loss, you will payout of your pocket to put yourself back into the position you were in before the loss, not withstanding your flood policy.
While there are a lot of caring and dedicated professionals who work for FEMA and the NFIP program who strive to do their very best to help suffering property owners, the rules and regulations imposed on them must change.
3. We wish this country would start serious discussions on a National Emergency Catastrophic Insurance program with a fund that kicks in when the President declares a National Cat Loss environment and gets badly damaged policyholders back on their feet without relying on the fine print of insurance policies and lawyers tying up our civil court system for years arguing about who pays for certain damages or tries to justify excessive payment on behalf of the stakeholders. How could we collectively fund it? Each property owner would be charged an annual fee as low as $1 per policy.
4. Short of a united grass roots consensus on #'s 2 & 3 above, we wish Florida would consider pulling out of the National Flood Insurance Program and establish a State Emergency Cat Flood Program. Have the program pay for actual proven flood damages with real incentives built in to motivate policyholders to improve mitigation or be subjected to a reduced benefit when the next flood happens to the same property. People need help not a flood insurance plan full of loopholes and exclusions, all of which can be changed based on the changing direction of the political winds in Congress.
5. Failing to establish #4 above, we wish the financial firms who hold mortgages on properties affected provide some relief to property owners given the fast approaching financial storm called Biggert–Waters. So far, the banks and credit unions have been silent. Surely they must realize they cannot bury their heads in the sand and just adjust the escrow accounts in order to collect the increased flood premiums. These folks will reap the benefits of foreclosed properties and no new business for property mortgages if B-W 2012 is not repealed or modified. If lenders don’t lend and foreclosures rise yet again, our national financial recovery may well be muted.
6. We wish the citizens of Florida would think long and hard about the people they elect to govern them. Today’s elections are won or lost on the money raised by special interest groups and negative advertising that is bought with this money. One only has to study the legislation that has come out of Tallahassee in the last five or so years on property insurance to understand this problem. The positions the legislature has taken, which we have witnessed with property insurance, are simply unbelievable. It’s called the last person to speak with the most money wins. The problem with Florida is that the basic risks stay the same while the legislative game (with little concern for enforcement) keeps changing as if it will make a difference. If you disagree, please tell us how things have gotten better for struggling homeowners in this state.
7. We wish insurance companies would do the right thing when claims are called in from their policyholders. Why do families have to resort to the media to get the attention of the claim department to release much needed and contractually promised policy benefits. And we’d like to know what happened to the much publicized “POLICYHOLDER BILL OF RIGHTS” that was supposed to consider the Florida insured at their time of need? Maybe the better question is why all these folks had to spend time and money on a multi-day meeting to highlight why a policyholder bill of rights was needed. What happened to helping your insured? After all, they paid a premium for coverage and one would assume some reasonable expectations of some rights following a loss.
8. We wish we could have a discussion about fees paid to agents and brokers. It seems the only Florida licensed insurance professionals who consistently are in the cross hairs of the legislature are public adjusters while insurance agents can charge up to 22% commission on flood policies! That should make you feel cheerful and merry along with a good slug of Biggert-Waters this holiday season. We are also told some big name insurance brokers are now selling pre-loss services in addition to the fee they charge for getting you coverage for the loss you might have. This is outright conflict of interest and double dipping. Do the legislators see any problems with this or do you even care? After all an election is coming up and no need to upset the campaign funding.
9. We wish we had some real honest debate on the real risks Florida faces and the fact that certain risks cannot and will not change. The homes and properties are already built in harm’s way all along Florida’s coast. Whether a Citizens state run insurance company or a bunch of new start-up insurance carriers cover the risks is not going to change anything. A great deal of rhetoric is out there about the fact that if the big one hits, everyone will have to pay for any Citizens Insurance Company shortfall through assessments. Who do you think will pay for shortfalls with all these take-out companies if they fail and are admitted carriers? Yep, every policyholder will pay through the Florida Insurance Guarantee Fund (FIGA) assessment powers that are already in place! If on the other hand your take-out company is not an admitted carrier, then you are in the surplus lines market where there is no safety net, no rules and regulations. So it may be awhile before you see any of your money. How many people in Florida do you think understand the surplus lines scheme?
10. We wish to acknowledge the Tampa Bay Times for being all over the flood insurance debacle. Kudos for awarding the “Sour Orange Award” for Florida’s biggest financial folly of the year. They should have included the politicians, the real estate industry, the insurance brokers and agents, the League of Cities, and all of their lobbyists for inclusion in this prestigious award. After all they completely dropped the ball on the flood insurance mess and in my view are the most culpable as they had a duty to watch out for the taxpaying citizens they represent. Remember the old saying--FIRST DO NO HARM.
11. We wish policyholders in harm’s way all across this great country and especially in the hurricane zone to not let their guard down but instead make disaster preparedness and recovery a part of their business plan and family discussion. The folks devastated by Super Storm Sandy no doubt have a new height of awareness and respect for emergency managers and their unbiased warnings to prepare and evacuate if necessary. We can only hope that other residents along the east coast have paid attention and do not let hurricane prep amnesia to set in.
Tutwiler & Associates will be monitoring and reporting on the progress of their wish list throughout 2014 on their On Property insurance claims blog.
About Tutwiler & Associates: Established in 1984, Tutwiler & Associates is a highly regarded, licensed public adjusting firm that represents commercial and residential property insurance policyholders in all property insurance damage claims. Tutwiler works exclusively for the policyholder to remove the stress of dealing with the insurance company and properly present their insurance damage claim to obtain a fair payment under the policy. Headquartered in Tampa, Florida Tutwiler is also licensed in New York, New Jersey and 9 other states. They can be reached at 1-800-321-4488 or by visiting http://www.publicadjuster.com
Read the full story at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/insurancewishlist/prweb11454254.htm