|Targeted News Service|
Dear Sir or Madam:
The practices of concern to the FHFA regard conflicts between parties to the insurance agreement including:
1. Certain Sales Commissions. The Enterprises shall prohibit sellers and servicers from receiving, directly or indirectly, remuneration associated with placing coverage with or maintaining placement with particular insurance providers.
2. Certain Reinsurance Activities. The Enterprises shall prohibit sellers and servicers from receiving, directly or indirectly, remuneration associated with an insurance provider ceding premiums to a reinsurer that is owned by, affiliated with or controlled by the sellers or servicers.
The FHFA states that a number of organizations and regulators have raised concerns about lender-placed insurance costs, compensation, and practices. This includes excessive rates and costs passed onto borrowers, as well as commissions and other compensation paid to certain servicers by carriers.
As the FHFA points out, there are some greater risks involved with lender-placed insurance. Lender-placed insurance carriers do not have the opportunity to underwrite the properties they insure, and loss ratios for this insurance are significantly below those for voluntary hazard insurance. Yet, premiums are generally higher than voluntary insurance.
ICBA agrees that charging premiums that are double or more than those charged for voluntary insurance is not appropriate, even given the higher risks involved with lender-placed insurance. While community banks have had relatively few loans needing lender- placed insurance during recent times due to fewer delinquencies as compared to other lenders, they report to ICBA that when they do obtain these policies, the premiums are much lower than the FHFA reports. While some premiums are higher, there is work required to place and monitor insurance and expenses are incurred. Servicers should receive compensation commensurate with the work performed.
Earlier this year, the
This is especially costly to small servicers. ICBA urges the FHFA to address the issue of excessive commissions with those servicers that the FHFA believes are earning them rather than make a blanket policy which will only end up harming smaller servicers. The cost of servicing for the Enterprises has increased dramatically over the past 5 years, placing an undue burden on community bank servicers to comply with new rules and processes. Most community banks that service for the Enterprises do so to provide better service to their customers. From a community bank's financial perspective, servicing mortgages for the Enterprises is at best a break-even business. As the cost of servicing for the Enterprises rises, more community banks will be forced to exit servicing for them. This will further consolidate the business among the largest servicers who are causing the problems the FHFA is trying to address.