|United Press International|
This only makes sense if you think like a lawyer: Insurance giant
AIG's board is scheduled to hold a hearing of sorts on Wednesday to review arguments for and against suing the government on the grounds the
The company was forced to sell valuable assets to pay off the loan, depriving shareholders of "tens of billions of dollars," along the way,
To think like a lawyer, of course, one has to take a damned if you do, damned if you don't approach. This means, had the government not bailed out the company, that would have provoked a lawsuit on grounds of neglect or indifference. But, since the government did bail out AIG, that opens up another ugly can of worms.
Lawyers like long lunches as much as anybody, so in this case we need a provocateur, a role amply filled by AIG's former chief executive officer
Do the math. After 40 years running AIG, Greenberg had become a major shareholder, whether he left in a hurry or not. His firm,
That puts the company's board in another corner, the Times said. What if they don't join the lawsuit and Greenberg wins his case. Shareholders could then sue or revolt or both. On the other hand, what happens to the recent nationwide marketing campaign in which AIG says thank you to the country for saving the company from bankruptcy?
The lawsuit hinges on the Fifth Amendment that forbids the government from seizing property and the focus there will be on the word "seizing," as the government will contend AIG accepted the bailout deal voluntarily.
It brings to mind the argument over how much pressure former Treasury Secretary
In this case, no such smoking gun has surfaced. Greenberg's team has not announced an after-hours conference in a parking lot or a secret memo written in invisible ink that proves the government's bailout was a conspiracy born of opportunity.
How big a part is motive in a case such as this? Did the government seize AIG out of greed or out of need? It brings to mind the J.D. Salinger quote, to paraphrase, in which he suspected there was a conspiracy out there to make him happy. In this case, there was a conspiracy to rescue AIG from its reckless investments. The government should probably plead guilty to that.
In international markets the
The S&P/ASX 200 in
In midday trading in
|Copyright:||Copyright 2013 United Press International, Inc. (UPI). Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.|